LianXingyun

Here's the definition and information on cyberbullying. So you are aware in case you ever face it:
Cyberbullying is the act of using digital technology—such as social media, messaging apps, forums, or other online platforms—to harass, intimidate, embarrass, or harm another person. It can take many forms, including:
- Hateful or threatening messages
- Spreading rumors or false information
- Public shaming or humiliation
- Doxxing (sharing private information without consent)
- Impersonation or identity theft to damage reputation
- Exclusion from online groups

No, cyberbullying is not always against someone "weaker." While it often targets individuals who seem vulnerable (e.g., teenagers, socially isolated people, or those with mental health struggles), it can also be directed at:

1. Public Figures & Celebrities:
Even powerful or famous people experience cyberbullying (e.g., online harassment, cancel culture, or mass hate).

2. Socially Influential Individuals (Influencers, Politicians, Activists)
High-profile individuals may face organized harassment, trolling, or smear campaigns.

3. Bullies Themselves (Retaliation & Cyber Harassment)
Sometimes, those who bully others online become targets themselves when public backlash turns against them.

4. Anyone in a Power Struggle
Cyberbullying can happen in workplaces, competitive industries, or personal relationships, where people may use online attacks to undermine each other.

If you ever become a victim of cyberbullying, please don't let it disturb your peace of mind and seek help.

He said that? Wow Can you post the link so that I can read it and form an educated opinion?

I told both sides to knock it off. But hey, take a scroll through the comments—because apparently, words like shit and pedo aren’t cyberbullying now? Wild.

Look, everything being thrown around is just claims from either side. Until there’s an actual verdict, I’m not picking a side, and I’m definitely not stooping to name-calling like a playground fight. Calling people fools in caps doesn't change opinions either. That’s just embarrassing.

Believe whatever you want, but let’s be real—both sides need to chill with the cyberbullying. And pointing fingers like "but they started it!"? Come on, that’s straight-up hypocritical. We’re not in kindergarten.

She’s probably got you on her hit list now. But hey, at the end of the day, I just hope people who thrive on hate can sleep at night—because if I ever pushed someone to the edge like that… I don’t think I’d ever close my eyes again.

@rinnie = cyberbully—playing judge, jury, and executioner while making sure no one can appeal the verdict. Gotta love the confidence of listing people like a personal burn book and then blocking them before they can respond. Bold strategy, but it screams 'I can dish it out but can’t take it. Block away girlie. https://kisskh.at/profile/linying

Cyberbully.

Wow. The sheer amount of hate here is both exhausting and depressingly predictable. Are we uncovering a crime or just indulging in another internet witch hunt? Because from where I’m sitting, it looks like people are playing detective, judge, and executioner—all while conveniently ignoring little things like facts and basic human decency.

So let me get this straight—an actress tragically took her own life, and now her ex is being publicly eviscerated based on speculation, blurry pictures, and a game of ‘he said, they said’—because, what, existing post-breakup is now a punishable offense? Was she a minor or an adult when they dated? Who's lying? Who's innocent? Is it all a big Agency conspiracy? Was he an abuser, or was he simply an idiot who made a dumb decision to date someone 12 years younger for a short time? Are people even interested in the truth or just filling in the gaps with their own drama-fueled narratives? One person is gone forever, and the other is likely spiraling into a psychological nightmare, but sure, let’s keep the torches burning.

Until there’s an actual verdict, maybe—just maybe—stop treating real human lives like disposable characters in your own drama-fueled revenge fantasy and stop the nasty comments and cyberbullying? From both sides. The hypocrisy is staggering. Did we learn nothing from past cyberbullying tragedies? Did we learn nothing from what happened to Kim Sae Ron? What’s the goal here? To push someone else over the edge just so we can feign shock and grief when it inevitably happens? Lather, rinse, repeat until another tragedy unfolds?

So, haters, be honest—do you actually care about the truth, or do you just love the spectacle? Speaking of which, are these articles true?
1. https://www.soompi.com/article/1729865wpp/kim-soo-hyuns-agency-releases-official-statement-regarding-recent-allegations
2. https://www.soompi.com/article/1730880wpp/kim-soo-hyuns-agency-releases-new-statement-in-response-to-recent-allegations

Because if they are, congrats, you’re an active participant in another round of mindless, performative cruelty. A cyberbully with a moral superiority complex.

Funny how people only hit pause when it’s too late (after driving someone to suicide) —not out of guilt, but because they need a fresh target. If this is the ‘justice’ some of you claim to fight for, maybe take a good, hard look in the mirror. At some point, you’re not exposing villains anymore—you are the villains.

I’ll wait for the truth, whatever it may be. And no, a life for a life is not justice, in my humble opinion.

I sure hope so. She became a reporter for a reason That job takes guts. If that car chase was any indication, she’s not exactly the timid type when it comes to exposing corruption. But honestly, it felt like a missed opportunity. They could’ve given us a deeper look into her inner fire in that first scene, like fight them off when they took her camera, it's not like they were holding a knife or a gun. I guess, timid and reporter doesn't mix well imo. Even the driver/assistant was timid...

People process trauma in different ways—some lash out, some shut down. Looks like they went with the latter. Fine, I get it. But I’d like to think her choice of profession isn’t just a random plot point. Because if you've shot down your emotions, being a reporter will open you to a lot of triggers. Maybe, deep down, it’s her subconscious way of wanting the truth about her own trauma to come to light. I'll keep watching and hope for a dynamic character development. As for ML, I have to keep in mind that this should be different from HL because it seems that the portrayal of Sang Yan here is different.

Whoa, did I accidentally stumble into WWIII in the comments? ML vs. FL showdown in full force, I see. Are people not allowed to love and hate fictional characters anymore? Y’all do realize art is subjective, right? Just like in real life, some people click, some don’t—it’s not a personal attack on the actors.

Anyway, carry on with the battlefield, I guess. Hope it’s at least fun to some people. Meanwhile, I’m still stuck on that car chase in episode 1—was there actually a point to it, or was it just to show that the FL is kindhearted?

Definitely script issue and how the scene was directed. Like I mentioned, in my view, visual execution is unrealistic for me. Unless actors are not allowed any creative input, I'll say the whole team is responsible for the scenes. I'd like to watch a strong female lead who gets their hands and their faces dirty. Maybe I'm looking at the wrong genre.

True, people react differently to disasters or assaults based on psychology, past experiences, and the nature of the threat. Freezing in shock can happen, especially in extreme situations like natural disasters. But without a strong emotional setup between the couple, I struggled to connect with the FL’s frozen or lack of strong reaction. Heck, I'd also expect screaming for help, yelling in anger, trying to claw her way out. For me, survival feels instinctive—fight or flight would kick in, adrenaline pumping, automatic. Then maybe shock will set in once the immediate threat of death has passed.

What also threw me off was the visual execution. She wakes up in a dirt hole, yet she looked flawless—clean face, perfect hair, no visible disorientation despite the drugs. It made her reaction feel off, lacking the raw terror I expected. Similarly, the husband's supposed heartbreak didn’t land—his tears didn’t move me. His inner conflict was non-existent. Unless... was it supposed to be fake tears? If the emotional weight wasn’t there, I would’ve preferred a more unhinged or diabolical portrayal to at least make his choice feel impactful and scare her into shock. I guess I was very disappointed since I heard it's a good show.

That scene completely took me out of the show. While I appreciate Wang Xing Yue’s acting, the FL's acting threw my off. I struggle with moments that ignore basic human instincts—even in fantasy. Being buried alive is a primal terror, yet the character just basically stood there, crying prettily, waiting for the shovel to hit her, instead of completely fighting for survival. Realism matters, even in fantastical settings, because authentic reactions make the stakes feel real. A scene like that should tap into raw desperation, not empty pretty aesthetics.