No they're calling out a groomer. Here ksh fans especially a man is victim shaming the late person. Who's actually…
There’s no definite proof that he is a groomer. All the evidence presented to the public has been debunked as fake, yet many people, still holding onto their initial impressions, refuse to accept that and create false narratives to match their views. defaming artists is as old as time.
Replying toLily Alice•Jun 3, 2026•Liked Jun 4, 2026
I must be reading you wrong. Are you defending the people that made up it up? you believe in freedom to lie cheat and steal for a living? The police have a case proving deliberate defamation. "Police believe Kim disseminated these claims, fully aware they were false, to attract public attention. The Gangnam Police Station stated in its recent warrant application submitted to the prosecution: "The suspect, despite knowing that the actor did not date the deceased during her minor years and that the cause of the deceased's death was not related to the actor, spread false information with the intent to defame."
Replying toAutumnshinae•Jun 4, 2026•Liked Jun 4, 2026
Not sure about the purpose of the article.. RIP Nakayama Miho.. J-ent isn't the same without your romance dramas and movies. You are terribly missed :(
Replying toMu Hyul•Mar 13, 2026•Liked Mar 13, 2026
Comments here are such cesspool towards kim seon ho. Man he has false allegations raised against him in past that…
I understand the frustration, but it’s important to tighten the argument so it stays credible and defensible.
The real issue isn’t that people are criticizing Kim Seon Ho again, it’s how they’re doing it. Right now, there is no solid backing in the form of an official finding, audit result, or charge. That’s a factual statement, not a fan position.
That said, bringing up past false allegations can easily be dismissed as emotional framing if it’s not tied back to evidence. The stronger point is this: previous media-driven controversies show exactly why conclusions should not be drawn before facts are established. History doesn’t prove innocence, but it does prove that rushing to judgment causes real harm.
Criticism is fine. Scrutiny is fine. What isn’t fine is treating unproven allegations as settled truth. That’s what people are pushing back against, not accountability itself.
"Police believe Kim disseminated these claims, fully aware they were false, to attract public attention. The Gangnam Police Station stated in its recent warrant application submitted to the prosecution: "The suspect, despite knowing that the actor did not date the deceased during her minor years and that the cause of the deceased's death was not related to the actor, spread false information with the intent to defame."
Why should i care about her son inherting property and this kind of topics spark conversation online why
RIP Nakayama Miho.. J-ent isn't the same without your romance dramas and movies. You are terribly missed :(
The drama is doing wonders outside of mainland China
The real issue isn’t that people are criticizing Kim Seon Ho again, it’s how they’re doing it. Right now, there is no solid backing in the form of an official finding, audit result, or charge. That’s a factual statement, not a fan position.
That said, bringing up past false allegations can easily be dismissed as emotional framing if it’s not tied back to evidence. The stronger point is this: previous media-driven controversies show exactly why conclusions should not be drawn before facts are established. History doesn’t prove innocence, but it does prove that rushing to judgment causes real harm.
Criticism is fine. Scrutiny is fine. What isn’t fine is treating unproven allegations as settled truth. That’s what people are pushing back against, not accountability itself.