Thanks to all the intelligent, rational, reasonable viewers and fans for making this show a great success. It was because of your honest faith and support that this show became a worldwide talk.
I feel sad for all the haters or irrational critics for not being able to contain their emotional damage to see a show grow to this popularity. Thanks for giving a free advertisement so that people can actually see why it is overrated, overhyped, and has wasted potential.
Fact-check:
Nielsen Korea As of Episode 16: #1 Highest-Rated Viewership tvN K-Drama of All-Time #3 Highest-Rated Viewership Cable TV K-Drama of All-Time
1. The World of the Married (JTBC): 28.371% 2. Reborn Rich (JTBC): 26.948% 3. Queen of Tears (TVN): 24.850%
Queen of Tears is likely to remain in the Top 10 on Netflix Global for subsequent weeks, even after the real-time release dates of its episodes.
Numbers don't lie. We would not have witnessed this if the show was that bad.
Yes, this place is full of VIP goons who want to flash their badges. But don't worry; neglect everyone and everything. Just watch the show with an open mind; you will enjoy it.
I came here to tell about this as well😅KSH and KJW feeding us content after content.This is why the shipping…
It's good to see her career grow. She is one of the best and prettiest actresses out there. I hope she comes up with more successful projects like this.
You are literally quoting other people's comments and shaming there opinion? you count this as critisism?let's…
1. Quote: "if you were putting forward fair points and backing the drama" I literally showed what I meant in my fourth point. If you can't understand, then thats your problem.
2. Quote: "you literally created another account and just proved my point how much obsessed you are..." This is my second account. I wouldn't have created this if I was not restricted from defending myself using the original account.
3. I don't know who this reviewer is. Whoever it might be, I would have criticized this review for its irrational interpretation.
1. This review is not comprehended properly, and the reviewer didn't make any effort to properly comprehend this review using rational, reasonable facts to back his bold criticism.
2. The reviewer is biased and has failed to properly represent his review just because he dislikes the cast, crew and plot. Nobody is saying this show is ultra-perfect. It has flaws, but his interpretation is a complete disrespect to QoT, its fans, and people who rationally appreciate it.
3. The reviewer has the liberty to criticize the drama, which doesn't seem personal. But if I criticize the review or the reviewer, it will indirectly or directly affect the reviewer's capacity to properly interpret or comprehend the information. If that seems like bullying, I can't help.
4. Quote: "The chemistry between the leads, while acceptable, lacks the spark needed to elevate their performances." Just look at this. Despite criticizing the show for having flaws, everyone stood and stayed united because of the couple and their excellent chemistry and performance. If he feels like that, which is completely irrational and fact-less, and if we criticize it by saying, "He can't comprehend properly," then that's bullying.
Edit: My narrative has, had, and will always be that the review was not properly comprehended by the reviewer. There are a bunch of VIP goons, friends of this OP, who want to spin their own narrative just to back their people. All they do is use the shield of bullying.
Yes! I will still say that he did not comprehend the review properly and he can't comprehend properly. And yes you are a minion. Restrict this account as well, I care less.
🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️They didn’t criticise a person… they reviewed a DRAMA?!?!?Why…
Dumbo! Whether I say the review is not comprehended properly or he can't comprehend properly, both will mean directly or indirectly to the reviewer itself.
For the reply, you are always quoting "he can't comprehend properly"; I had to say it that way to the comment I replied to.
If that seems like bullying, I can't help. Also, if people think I am bullying, I cannot correct them. They can say whatever they want.
Also, you only want to make me look like a bully just because you can't contain the emotional damage caused by the fact that you are a minion.
I feel sad for all the haters or irrational critics for not being able to contain their emotional damage to see a show grow to this popularity. Thanks for giving a free advertisement so that people can actually see why it is overrated, overhyped, and has wasted potential.
Fact-check:
Nielsen Korea
As of Episode 16:
#1 Highest-Rated Viewership tvN K-Drama of All-Time
#3 Highest-Rated Viewership Cable TV K-Drama of All-Time
1. The World of the Married (JTBC): 28.371%
2. Reborn Rich (JTBC): 26.948%
3. Queen of Tears (TVN): 24.850%
Queen of Tears is likely to remain in the Top 10 on Netflix Global for subsequent weeks, even after the real-time release dates of its episodes.
Numbers don't lie. We would not have witnessed this if the show was that bad.
Yes, this place is full of VIP goons who want to flash their badges. But don't worry; neglect everyone and everything. Just watch the show with an open mind; you will enjoy it.
I literally showed what I meant in my fourth point. If you can't understand, then thats your problem.
2. Quote: "you literally created another account and just proved my point how much obsessed you are..."
This is my second account. I wouldn't have created this if I was not restricted from defending myself using the original account.
3. I don't know who this reviewer is. Whoever it might be, I would have criticized this review for its irrational interpretation.
2. The reviewer is biased and has failed to properly represent his review just because he dislikes the cast, crew and plot. Nobody is saying this show is ultra-perfect. It has flaws, but his interpretation is a complete disrespect to QoT, its fans, and people who rationally appreciate it.
3. The reviewer has the liberty to criticize the drama, which doesn't seem personal. But if I criticize the review or the reviewer, it will indirectly or directly affect the reviewer's capacity to properly interpret or comprehend the information. If that seems like bullying, I can't help.
4. Quote: "The chemistry between the leads, while acceptable, lacks the spark needed to elevate their performances."
Just look at this. Despite criticizing the show for having flaws, everyone stood and stayed united because of the couple and their excellent chemistry and performance. If he feels like that, which is completely irrational and fact-less, and if we criticize it by saying, "He can't comprehend properly," then that's bullying.
Edit: My narrative has, had, and will always be that the review was not properly comprehended by the reviewer. There are a bunch of VIP goons, friends of this OP, who want to spin their own narrative just to back their people. All they do is use the shield of bullying.
Alright Einstein. You can Blab blab anything. I care less.
Restrict this account as well, I care less.
For the reply, you are always quoting "he can't comprehend properly"; I had to say it that way to the comment I replied to.
If that seems like bullying, I can't help. Also, if people think I am bullying, I cannot correct them. They can say whatever they want.
Also, you only want to make me look like a bully just because you can't contain the emotional damage caused by the fact that you are a minion.
Why would I admit anything that a minion says?
You don't deserve anything other than the worst pepper mouth that you are proud of.
"I want to say that the review is not properly comprehended." Who does this refer to?
Just give me the answer; don't beat around the bush with your preaching.
I want to say that the review is not properly comprehended. Who does this refer to?