Kaptan

I don't have time to follow those forums or other sources right now. I just follow it from mydramalist and watch it when I have time. Thank you very much.

O.K.

I also found what was done to be very simple.

As far as I can see, it didn't lead to anything. Then, the events of Si's sister's family started. She's trying to get everywhere. The plot seems to be falling apart completely.

I Understood. Thanks

Episode 16 did not suit the series. It was an episode that was lost due to simplicity. First of all, the mother and daughter, who are not girls but boys, sell the girls who come to the inn. There is Jiang Si and Chu Chu. They visit both of them. It is written on her forehead that she is a fighter, so they set their eyes on Jiang Si, not Chu Chu. Now, is it because of the dust or the grass that our daughter has a fever. In the morning, everyone comes to see Si. The innkeeper woman says she has a fever, men cannot enter. The ones who are with her, one of whom is her brother and the others are her friends, do not let them in as men. She also brushes the women away. They are so easily fooled. One of them is the commander in charge of the Security of the Capital. He is a smart man. Everyone is fooled by Chu Chu, he is a fighter girl who does not believe. The brother is naive. The others are submissive. How come they entrust Si to a stranger who says you cannot enter, and 5 out of 6 people act according to what that woman says. 1 person remains. He also becomes stupid. Supposedly the assistant of the Security Commander. He is sitting in the sun. Stay in the shade, brother. Then he drinks the water given to him and gets worse. In other words, it is beyond simplicity. The whole series was going very well until this episode. Should it have fallen into this simplicity? This is to be announced to the writers and directors. Don't accuse me of being a troll. I am not a troll. I am a viewer. An attentive viewer. I do not say what this is and act temporarily. I do not remain unresponsive to the mistakes made. I have nothing to say about the actors or their games. However, it is a simple writing or a direction accordingly. The way it handled the event was very, very simple. It does not suit the characters. Their escape and capture were both that simple. It was fast. I did not find it convincing. Please, the director and the scriptwriter read it and do not include such simplistic and mistakes again. I expect better. Enjoy the movie...

Thank you. I'll keep watching.

I agree with your words. I see it as a positive criticism. That friend of ours had a misunderstanding, which as you said, was due to translation. I couldn't explain my feelings. What I said in my own language went to different places in English with different words. This friend misunderstood me and said that I attacked the actor, that I couldn't even stand his smirk. However, I didn't say anything about the actor's game, personality, or character in my comments. I used smirk in the sense of "being obvious, clear". I took up such a defense in response to the harsh expressions used against me, because I was being attacked. Someone else accused me of being a TROLL. This means that we have no right to make a negative criticism of any series, actor, or momentary performance. Is that how it should be? My criticism is that I say that the actor's performance, which everyone appreciated and everyone applauded and said should be first, was not like that. In my opinion, it was not aesthetic, it looked like it was done without any effort. If it weren't for the swing scene, it would have remained something flat. Even if the actor was not prepared, the director should have seen it. At least the other dancer, who I said did better. I said that he would not stand out so much in a group dance with that dance. These are criticisms. Performance criticism. It is a criticism of a 1-minute performance. It is not about the series as a whole, the actor's game and character. We do not know the actors, we see them in series anyway. Another one may say that I liked it very much. I respect everyone. I expressed that I did not like it. Unfortunately, I was excluded, trolled, treated as a bad commentator. I am sorry.

Good observation. A different perspective.

O.K. Thank you. I hope you enjoy watching.

Misunderstanding. The word grin, which is in my first comment. The word grin here is not used in the sense of laughing, but as "his mistake became apparent" "his mistake came to light". It means "it became obvious, director, didn't you see?" The wrong word was used while translating the spoken language into written language. If you showed any resentment, hurt, or anger based on this, I apologize for the wrong word. That's not what I meant. I hope you understand.

As I said, I didn't say anything about the actor's personality or game. I made a dance performance criticism. It was exaggerated. Or it was misunderstood. I don't know. I'm watching the series. I wish you a good time too.

I watch it with pleasure. As I said, the dance there is perfect, it seems to have beaten the other one, and it is already declared first in the next episode. That's why I wrote to say that I expected a much better performance, but I received a lot of criticism. I'm not judging the actor, I'm not criticizing his personality, I'm not criticizing his acting either. I just criticized that one-minute performance saying it should have been better than the other one. That's all. I'm continuing to watch. Thank you.

You are truly obsessed. I didn't say anything about the actress's acting. In the series, this girl's dancing is praised to the skies due to the plot. The other dance is described as a fiasco. I said; Since you are making such a plot, if you had shown this girl a dance she could do, for example; like the other actor's group dance, then she would have looked better in most cases. The mistakes wouldn't have been noticed. Because she didn't work on the dance, this is my opinion. I didn't like her dance. It should have been better. I stated that the director should have known this, warned her, and made her do better according to the plot. The actor who did the group dance worked and performed a better dance, and if there were any mistakes, they weren't noticed, I said. You say she gets angry at me, but you yourself come up with an over-the-top response. You don't respect anyone's opinion. And no one criticizes the actor's acting. She's not a dancer, so is the other actor a dancer? It's a 1-minute event. You will work on certain patterns, add something from yourself. It seems like she only tried to do what was shown, she didn't take any extra care. The images are like that. That's how I perceived it. Why should I be hung up on his smile. Do I have such an expression? I didn't say anything like that. DON'T LIE. DON'T DISTORT THE EVENTS. Look, all the articles are there. When you try to defend someone, you make the environment tense, and on top of that you say he gets angry at me. Don't make fun of him. Be respectful of opinions and comments. I didn't say anything about the actor's personality or his acting. I criticized his dancing. He could have worked harder and done it much better. The editing required this. I said the director made a mistake here. While everything is obvious, please be careful with your words, your tone, and not to denigrate people. We are all viewers. I have nothing to do with people. I am neither a fan nor an anti-fan. I am just a costumed TV series watcher. And I enjoy watching it. That's all.

I am not English. I am trying to write by translating it into English. There may be some mistakes. Please excuse me. I leave it to your vast knowledge, mindset, and character to not understand what is being said and to get caught up in simple grammar mistakes. You must be a very meticulous person. If you have read my comments to other viewers, a friend of ours warned me and I tried to correct it as much as I could. But it would be better if you focus on what is being said and not on grammar. Enjoy watching.

English is not my native language. I may have made a mistake while translating. Please excuse me. I didn't look at the director's identity either. The main thing here is that since it was said that his dancing was very good, I expected the lead actor to be better, on the contrary, the supporting actor was better at dancing and it was obvious that she worked on her dancing. She did multiple dances. Even if she made a mistake, it wouldn't have been obvious. For this reason, I thought it would be more appropriate for the director to resort to such a method, that is, to give multiple dances to the lead actor, knowing this situation. At least it wouldn't have been noticeable. It did catch my eye. It was very bad. For example; The curling of his hands was the worst. He wasn't agile at all. Since he can't do it. She shouldn't have insisted. In my opinion, She got over it with a few rehearsals. In other words, She didn't work. You said She took dance lessons. If you watch it, you'll see that it's not a practiced or successful dance at all. Of course, in my opinion. My opinion, what I saw. But her acting is very good, and I've enjoyed watching it so far. I'm watching it.

Thank you.

If a viewer says whether they like something or not, then trolling is right. But if it is not, then you are being a troll, being oppressive. Is it a crime to state that we do not like it? I said the other actor danced better. Is it a crime? I did not say that I did not like the actor's acting, I said that I did not like his dancing. It does not fit the plot either. Why does it not fit? Because they say that this one danced much better but we have to give it to another one. When the flow of the series is like this, I said no, he danced badly. The other actor's dancing was better. Because it is obvious that he worked hard. You cannot even bend your hand. You tried to dance swiftly. This is a write-off for the director. He should have taken other measures when he saw that his actor could not do it. This is my opinion. You agree or not. I do not agree with you either. Who is the TROLL now? You or me? Look, I am saying it again, I did not criticize the actor's acting, I criticized his dancing. I also watch the series. Why would I disappear silently? Are you going to disappear after the accusation you made? Because you called me a troll, everyone liked your comment, but no one liked me. You can also try not to comment on my comment silently. Enjoy watching...

I respect that. I didn't like it.

Jelly Lin's dance was very bad in the competition in the 16th episode. A lead actor may not know how to dance, but she can learn. She can work. She should be able to do a show that will not embarrass her and will satisfy the audience by working a little for the plan to be shot. However, it did not happen that way, either the actor did not work at all, passed it by the management, or she is not talented, this is what she can do. In contrast, the actor in the position of his opponent, Li Jia Xin, was very successful. She studied his lessons, prepared for the show. She did not grin at all. She danced with a few dancers anyway, if She had any mistakes, it was not noticed. I wish the director had done the opposite. In other words, for the praiseworthy lead actor, she should have done Jia Xin's dance for Jelly Lin so that we would not have watched that cold, unseemly, inappropriate dance with the dancers. And they are upset because they did not win first place. It is said that the jury made a wrong and biased decision, whereas the jury made the right decision, albeit unwillingly. I think the Lu Yun character will come and correct this now. When I watched it, I realized that the actor was trying to do that dance in a very clumsy way but it didn't work, and I remembered to write these. Either you would have cast a dancer in the leading role, which would have been met with a standing ovation. Or you would have had him perform a proper dance, which wouldn't have been noticed. She grinned a lot, my dear director, didn't you see it? Or am I not seeing it? She is a really successful actor and am I wrong? It didn't work for me. I didn't like it.