Kaptan

I read the comments. There is no information about the release date. It is still being shot. It is said that it will probably be released in 2026. Have you ever seen the trailers of a series that has not finished filming? The trailer for this series has been released. This means that it will be released. In other words, the filming has finished. If it has not finished, background shots called footage from the filming would be released, right? I don't know if I am wrong or not. I think that if the trailer has been released, the filming of the series has finished. It means that it will be released soon. But I don't know the release date or possible date. If anyone knows, please write. I am also looking forward to watching the series. I hope it will be released soon.

I am one of those who watched Princess Agents. I do not accept the word terrible. It may have made you feel bad in terms of content. But the series was not terrible. On the contrary, it was played by very high quality, very good actors, and it is a production in which many actors took part. In my opinion, it is one of the productions that has made a name for itself in Chinese historical dramas. Read the comments and they say, "Is it Princess Agents?" It was an unforgettable production for me too. It was definitely not terrible. I gave it a 9.5. It was one of the unforgettable series I have watched for me. I also really liked its CAST. If you pay attention, the series did not receive a score below 8 anywhere. How could it be terrible???

I think I got things mixed up. Sorry.

A different perspective. I get what you mean. It is a drama where women are prioritized. Here you say that no matter what happens, women's say is prioritized. If we look at it this way, and consider men to be stupid. I agree.

Where in Los Angeles are you from? All of these are also on mydramalist.

Unfortunately, the 20th episode continues with logical errors or mistakes of making things happen that are not possible. In this century, the noble wife is definitely ahead of the concubine and is also the mother of the children. However, she cannot make a marriage proposal without her husband's knowledge or the knowledge of the elder of the house. Here, the woman argues with her husband and says she has made her decision. She even says I sent a letter and accepted the marriage proposals. The husband gets angry but accepts. As if he is helpless.

However, she can go and consult her mother. If the elder of the house says whatever happens, then it has to be what he says. The lie will be revealed. He did not go.
What would have happened if her husband had told her I am divorcing you then? It was not possible for a woman to insist on doing what she says and to defy her husband and disregard her elders in that way according to that time. Again, our scriptwriter and author have made up their minds. In my opinion, it is wrong.

He can defend himself like this. The man is a stupid character, I created him, I wrote him like this. Then okay.
Also in episode 21, Si doesn't know the man she's been with since the beginning, so she can't recognize Yu Qi even though she's come to the bottom of him. Is it possible? I don't think it's possible. But I leave it to your discretion. The author is messing with our minds.

I don't have time to follow those forums or other sources right now. I just follow it from mydramalist and watch it when I have time. Thank you very much.

O.K.

I also found what was done to be very simple.

As far as I can see, it didn't lead to anything. Then, the events of Si's sister's family started. She's trying to get everywhere. The plot seems to be falling apart completely.

I Understood. Thanks

Episode 16 did not suit the series. It was an episode that was lost due to simplicity. First of all, the mother and daughter, who are not girls but boys, sell the girls who come to the inn. There is Jiang Si and Chu Chu. They visit both of them. It is written on her forehead that she is a fighter, so they set their eyes on Jiang Si, not Chu Chu. Now, is it because of the dust or the grass that our daughter has a fever. In the morning, everyone comes to see Si. The innkeeper woman says she has a fever, men cannot enter. The ones who are with her, one of whom is her brother and the others are her friends, do not let them in as men. She also brushes the women away. They are so easily fooled. One of them is the commander in charge of the Security of the Capital. He is a smart man. Everyone is fooled by Chu Chu, he is a fighter girl who does not believe. The brother is naive. The others are submissive. How come they entrust Si to a stranger who says you cannot enter, and 5 out of 6 people act according to what that woman says. 1 person remains. He also becomes stupid. Supposedly the assistant of the Security Commander. He is sitting in the sun. Stay in the shade, brother. Then he drinks the water given to him and gets worse. In other words, it is beyond simplicity. The whole series was going very well until this episode. Should it have fallen into this simplicity? This is to be announced to the writers and directors. Don't accuse me of being a troll. I am not a troll. I am a viewer. An attentive viewer. I do not say what this is and act temporarily. I do not remain unresponsive to the mistakes made. I have nothing to say about the actors or their games. However, it is a simple writing or a direction accordingly. The way it handled the event was very, very simple. It does not suit the characters. Their escape and capture were both that simple. It was fast. I did not find it convincing. Please, the director and the scriptwriter read it and do not include such simplistic and mistakes again. I expect better. Enjoy the movie...

Thank you. I'll keep watching.

I agree with your words. I see it as a positive criticism. That friend of ours had a misunderstanding, which as you said, was due to translation. I couldn't explain my feelings. What I said in my own language went to different places in English with different words. This friend misunderstood me and said that I attacked the actor, that I couldn't even stand his smirk. However, I didn't say anything about the actor's game, personality, or character in my comments. I used smirk in the sense of "being obvious, clear". I took up such a defense in response to the harsh expressions used against me, because I was being attacked. Someone else accused me of being a TROLL. This means that we have no right to make a negative criticism of any series, actor, or momentary performance. Is that how it should be? My criticism is that I say that the actor's performance, which everyone appreciated and everyone applauded and said should be first, was not like that. In my opinion, it was not aesthetic, it looked like it was done without any effort. If it weren't for the swing scene, it would have remained something flat. Even if the actor was not prepared, the director should have seen it. At least the other dancer, who I said did better. I said that he would not stand out so much in a group dance with that dance. These are criticisms. Performance criticism. It is a criticism of a 1-minute performance. It is not about the series as a whole, the actor's game and character. We do not know the actors, we see them in series anyway. Another one may say that I liked it very much. I respect everyone. I expressed that I did not like it. Unfortunately, I was excluded, trolled, treated as a bad commentator. I am sorry.

Good observation. A different perspective.

O.K. Thank you. I hope you enjoy watching.

Misunderstanding. The word grin, which is in my first comment. The word grin here is not used in the sense of laughing, but as "his mistake became apparent" "his mistake came to light". It means "it became obvious, director, didn't you see?" The wrong word was used while translating the spoken language into written language. If you showed any resentment, hurt, or anger based on this, I apologize for the wrong word. That's not what I meant. I hope you understand.

As I said, I didn't say anything about the actor's personality or game. I made a dance performance criticism. It was exaggerated. Or it was misunderstood. I don't know. I'm watching the series. I wish you a good time too.

I watch it with pleasure. As I said, the dance there is perfect, it seems to have beaten the other one, and it is already declared first in the next episode. That's why I wrote to say that I expected a much better performance, but I received a lot of criticism. I'm not judging the actor, I'm not criticizing his personality, I'm not criticizing his acting either. I just criticized that one-minute performance saying it should have been better than the other one. That's all. I'm continuing to watch. Thank you.

You are truly obsessed. I didn't say anything about the actress's acting. In the series, this girl's dancing is praised to the skies due to the plot. The other dance is described as a fiasco. I said; Since you are making such a plot, if you had shown this girl a dance she could do, for example; like the other actor's group dance, then she would have looked better in most cases. The mistakes wouldn't have been noticed. Because she didn't work on the dance, this is my opinion. I didn't like her dance. It should have been better. I stated that the director should have known this, warned her, and made her do better according to the plot. The actor who did the group dance worked and performed a better dance, and if there were any mistakes, they weren't noticed, I said. You say she gets angry at me, but you yourself come up with an over-the-top response. You don't respect anyone's opinion. And no one criticizes the actor's acting. She's not a dancer, so is the other actor a dancer? It's a 1-minute event. You will work on certain patterns, add something from yourself. It seems like she only tried to do what was shown, she didn't take any extra care. The images are like that. That's how I perceived it. Why should I be hung up on his smile. Do I have such an expression? I didn't say anything like that. DON'T LIE. DON'T DISTORT THE EVENTS. Look, all the articles are there. When you try to defend someone, you make the environment tense, and on top of that you say he gets angry at me. Don't make fun of him. Be respectful of opinions and comments. I didn't say anything about the actor's personality or his acting. I criticized his dancing. He could have worked harder and done it much better. The editing required this. I said the director made a mistake here. While everything is obvious, please be careful with your words, your tone, and not to denigrate people. We are all viewers. I have nothing to do with people. I am neither a fan nor an anti-fan. I am just a costumed TV series watcher. And I enjoy watching it. That's all.