I see what the story tried to do but it felt forced and unrealistic. I understood that they wanted to create a…
Fallacy... I dont hate you or things like this i just want speak in right way in cinema way. And we cant have this so i give up. Cinema is not math but still have rules... We have things like "Cahiers du Cinéma" Because of this.
(Yeah... all of us talking with taste but some of us match our talks with cinema if we dont do that we cant speak about it... when somebody says : There is no chemistry He/Her has to give cinematic reasons for his words, otherwise he is just labeled... And this is not criticism.)
I see that you two did not understand this drama. Sae ro yi & yi seo... They are well Characterizations in first half of drama. Soo ah is agood person but he dont love sae ro yi. Sae ro yi He was disappointed in her But we see that he does not change... He has lost his feelings for her but does not know it. He was most mad by yi seo over time not by jang dae hee! These are all markings
You watch a lot of dramas but you almost dont know anything... All your criticism was purely tasteful and worthy of your personality, but it had no cinematic value.
This is a masterpiece. Start like the w but ending is much much much better. Realism doesn't matter in cinema. The review writers are... very amatur:) This is predictable, and so on; many great movies in cinema history at the very beginning show the ending so we don't get involved in prediction and just think about "how" is going to happen.
For me, reality is not important, but it is important what the writer and director mean by doing that and making this sequence.
I dont hate you or things like this i just want speak in right way in cinema way.
And we cant have this so i give up.
Cinema is not math but still have rules...
We have things like
"Cahiers du Cinéma"
Because of this.
(Yeah... all of us talking with taste but some of us match our talks with cinema if we dont do that we cant speak about it... when somebody says : There is no chemistry He/Her has to give cinematic reasons for his words, otherwise he is just labeled... And this is not criticism.)
Sae ro yi & yi seo... They are well Characterizations in first half of drama.
Soo ah is agood person but he dont love sae ro yi.
Sae ro yi He was disappointed in her But we see that he does not change...
He has lost his feelings for her but does not know it.
He was most mad by yi seo over time not by jang dae hee!
These are all markings
All your criticism was purely tasteful and worthy of your personality, but it had no cinematic value.
Kill me heal me
Cruel city
Reply 1988
And now i have a fourth.
Reviews?
They really amateur...
5?
Only the lighting in this series was worth five points.
They dont know much about cinema...
Almost they dont know anything.
Start like the w but ending is much much much better.
Realism doesn't matter in cinema.
The review writers are... very amatur:)
This is predictable, and so on; many great movies in cinema history at the very beginning show the ending so we don't get involved in prediction and just think about "how" is going to happen.
For me, reality is not important, but it is important what the writer and director mean by doing that and making this sequence.
Best movie of year?
Ad astra.
Parasite is not even my top 3 of bong joon ho
Park seo joon's last mess is parasite.
I still can,t believe bong joon ho...
The only thing in cinema is
"HOW WE TELL A STORY."
But this is not good at all
Masterpiece
But still kill me heal me is best
If you dont watch the cruel city watch it... my 2nd drama and a masterpiece
https://www.instagram.com/p/B3ZB-trJLAW/?igshid=1i1wqo89n9b2a
It's official?
Where is "san wook"???