Lee Hyeok

How?
The family side show text and other ''proof'' that they can't prove are true or even authentic (the family even said to a reporter asking them to prove that the text were authentic that they didn't have to prove anything, which is false, they have to prove their accusation is true), while his side as back their evidence with metadata and reliable proof.

Their "factual proof" was a sinister mix of "trust me, bro, we have evidence"

That's exactly what the so called ''parent'' of KSR have been doing since the start. While KSH have been showing proof that contradict and back their claim, KSR parent are saying we should believe them without showing any proof.

during their conference, they admit that the text they show was not the original text and that they had it at home and a reporter ask them how they could prove it was real, the family then told them they didn't have to prove it. What? they don't have to prove it? yes, they in fact have to prove it.

GM and KSH side have show metadata, backing their claimed and until now, all they show was back and showing he wasn't guilty at all.

Yes, I'm a fan and I have no shame in admitting I admire his work, but I'm not a crazy fan either. In my view and in logic, it's innocent until proven guilty and until now, he prove he's innocent. But, of course, if something came out and prove that he is guilty, then yes, he should pay for his crime, but until that happen, in my eyes, he's innocent until proven guilty.

Unlike you, (who already jump to guilty at the start) I only believe in the evidence and to this date, KSR family didn't show anything that back their claim. If they did, I'll change my mind, but until then, I won't play the judge, because I and you are not judge nor jury.

With source? oh please, don't try to make me believe you actually believe that. During their press conference, the family literally respond to a reporter who ask them if they had proof that the letter they were showing was from KSR and they said they didn't have to prove it. Yes, you have to prove it. KSH side already back their claimed with factual proof and have confirmed them, while the family just think we will take their words for it, when they are in fact not close to KSR at all.

#1, that's not a lie, because it's something common in SK to hide the artist relationship.

#2, yes they are baseless and clearly false.

#3, all the evidence shown by KSR family have been debunked by factual proof and with metadata that prove that even if they date, it was when she was in fact an adult.

Do you go to every funeral of people you know? I know i don't because sometime, there engagements I can't put aside for a funeral.

With you, no matter how many proof and evidence that will prove he's innocent, you will never believed it, is that right?

You know you're not all knowing and you're neither judge and jury.

Like i said to a lot, it's innocent until proven guilty, if he's guilty he should of course face justice, but not by us either.

No, i'm not stupid, i just wait until bashing someone like you people who believe this story from her so called aunt, just because it was on his birthday. A person is innocent until proven guilty.

We and you (since you think you are all knowing) are not judge nor jury. I'm waiting for the evidence and until now, everything seem to contradict her family claim.

You can't fabricate a wedding paper (well you can, but then it would be easy to see if it's authenticate or not and it's been authenticated)

So to me, it seems you only want a person to blame and have an actor you hate and he was relate to KSR so for you it's enough. But unlike you, I will wait for proof that can't be denied and if he's guilty, again he should face justice.

Wow, now they're making people up... didn't know how far you would go to try to bash him. You don't believe his side, but are readybto believe that he's guilty just because what? She did it on his birthday? Seriously? That's your proof that all of that is true? Serisouly?

Let me tell you something. It's innocent until proven guilty and of course, if he's guilty, he should face justice and there no question there from my part. But, until now i have seen nothing that prove he's guilty.

well, they did tried to prevent his existence from being revealed, so their claim is very less convincing.

because he have been exposed. if those text message didn't see the light of day, he would have say silent forever.

what people don't understand is that all this bashing is destroying someone career and that if he's proven guilty, his career will still be over, but would they apologize? no, because they don't care, they need someone to blame for what happen to KSR and her family (who was proven by her ex-boyfriend, didn't care about her until now) have found the perfect person.

Then they will ask, why did the family didn't go after the husband then? well maybe because, unlike KSH, he wasn't famous and couldn't pay them anything, so they had to fabricate a story to get money.

Once again, if all of this is true, he should face justice, 100%, but not from us, we are neither judge or jury and so many celebrities have lost their career and in some case way more because of allegation and rumors that were proven false way too late.

I agree with you on one thing ''We do not have to believe him'' but the same goes with the allegation against KSH. If he's guilty, he should face justice, but until then, it's only rumors and allegation, nothing confirmed to be true and the so called ''Evidence'' were all debunk to be after, when she was an adult. Of course, if new evidence come to light and that he's in fact guilty, he should face justice, but yet again, we need to have real proof and not just allegation and rumors.

imaginary? the certificate of marriage was provide as proof that he exist. and the date have no significance at all. it's innocent until proven guilty, we are not judge or jury. I'm not a fan obsess, yes I like his acting, but if he's proven guilty without a doubt, then I will boycott him, but until then, we should wait.

First your judge and jury and now, you start conspiracy theory. Seriously..... if he's guilty I'll boycott him, but until then it's innocent until proven guilty and again, yes, if he's guilty I'll boycott him, but until then, i'm not judge or jury and neither you.

No one is making her a villain, she's.....well, she was a good actress and I really loved her in bloodhounds and was shock when she disappear without a word (then i learned about the incident) still she shouldn't have lost her job over this, but this is how Korea work sadly. But like I said, it's not her that they are making the villain, it's her fake aunt and family whom until this point weren't interest in her and it's sad.

People are still asking for proof because that's what we need, actual proof. All that was shown until now only show that KSH isn't guilty at all and that actually, they did date, but when she was an adult. On the other hand, if he did date her way before that, then count me in, I'll boycott him without hesitation, but we all see what rumors are doing to celebrities or even ordinary people. That's why proof and fact are important and we shouldn't judge before getting anything other than fact and proof.

Her friends and ex-boyfriends have all come forward saying that the blamed shouldn't be on KSH, but on her husband.

Again, if at the end, they come forward with proof that KSH side can't contradict, then yes, I'll believe he's guilty and will boycott him, but until then, we are not judge nor jury and shouldn't judge someone before having all the fact.

On that we agreee. She did it herself, but everyone is blaming an innocent men (KSH) based on rumors.

We also know that her family is lying ;)

So we have four facts total and no more:
1) Yes, but they were both adult
2) Yes, but yet again, they were both adult
3) Yes, but first, he was wearing short, her family just cover that part to make her story work for them.

+++

it's not just in court, buying all those rumors (which are only rumors and have been proven false as of now) can destroy people lives.

+++

the audio and photo that were released recently have been proven authentic, by the fact that one of her friend confirmed the story about her being married and having an abortion and her problem with her husband.

None of that is true. I agree, if he's guilty of that, then he must pay, but nothing have been proving. Otherwise, evidence from his side were verified and prove that he's innocent.

Of course, if new evidence and not just rumors come to light and prove that her mother was telling the truth, then yes, like I said, he should pay, but nothing was proven, only that he's innocent.

+ in the new evidence shown, an audio of her talking about her husband and how she was mistreat by him when given and even a friend of hers said that the audio was true.

and last time I check, everyone is ''Innocent, until proven guilty'' but with netizen, it's the contrary and even if he's proven innocent, they won't believe it. For me, it's innocent until proven guilty and until now, the evidence only show that he's in fact, innocent. If new evidence and again, not rumors, come to light and show that he's guilty, I'll change my mind, but until then, he's innocnet.

Yeah, I watch the show and it's literally the crown from ''Game of Thrones''. It surprise me that they would use that image.

isn't it a picture from the american show ''Game of Thrones''?