I agree. Every single evidence so far is circumstantial. Not a single one proves one way over the other . Bottom…
We also know that her family is lying ;)
So we have four facts total and no more: 1) Yes, but they were both adult 2) Yes, but yet again, they were both adult 3) Yes, but first, he was wearing short, her family just cover that part to make her story work for them.
+++
it's not just in court, buying all those rumors (which are only rumors and have been proven false as of now) can destroy people lives.
+++
the audio and photo that were released recently have been proven authentic, by the fact that one of her friend confirmed the story about her being married and having an abortion and her problem with her husband.
I agree. Every single evidence so far is circumstantial. Not a single one proves one way over the other . Bottom…
None of that is true. I agree, if he's guilty of that, then he must pay, but nothing have been proving. Otherwise, evidence from his side were verified and prove that he's innocent.
Of course, if new evidence and not just rumors come to light and prove that her mother was telling the truth, then yes, like I said, he should pay, but nothing was proven, only that he's innocent.
+ in the new evidence shown, an audio of her talking about her husband and how she was mistreat by him when given and even a friend of hers said that the audio was true.
and last time I check, everyone is ''Innocent, until proven guilty'' but with netizen, it's the contrary and even if he's proven innocent, they won't believe it. For me, it's innocent until proven guilty and until now, the evidence only show that he's in fact, innocent. If new evidence and again, not rumors, come to light and show that he's guilty, I'll change my mind, but until then, he's innocnet.
There are names like boomerang snake or whale return. I know nothing about tennis but they didn't seem real.
Well, in the show, the coach said that the ''Twist Serve'' is a technique use by Rafael Nadal, which he use in real life and the boomerang snake is also something use in real life, but only by pro of maybe a real life Lu Xia.
The problem is.....they used too many CGI for the tennis balls n unrealistic techniques. And i am not a fan of…
Well, the move of Lu Xia ''Twist Serve'' like they said was from Rafael Nadal, a real Tennis player and the snake ball is something that was seen in real game. Some may be false technique, but some are real tennis technique that some real player are using in game.
Do you go to the wedding of the pastry chief? or the wedding of your doctor? Are you related to him? if not, why…
And? Would you like that complete stranger attended your wedding, saying they are your ''fan''? I don't think so. I'm also a fan, but I would never ask that kind of thing, it's his day and we must respect his privacy.
What is the date for his marriage cermony? Can we fans go and attend it?
Do you go to the wedding of the pastry chief? or the wedding of your doctor? Are you related to him? if not, why would you be invited? He may be an actor, he may be a celebrity, but he's still an human being and he have a right to his privacy. Why can't you respect that?
who care what you think? he love her, that's all that matter. He don't care about your opinion. And btw, who are you to judge? you don't know her and you don't know him. Maybe she can speak Korean, not like you, I'm pretty sure you can't.
So we have four facts total and no more:
1) Yes, but they were both adult
2) Yes, but yet again, they were both adult
3) Yes, but first, he was wearing short, her family just cover that part to make her story work for them.
+++
it's not just in court, buying all those rumors (which are only rumors and have been proven false as of now) can destroy people lives.
+++
the audio and photo that were released recently have been proven authentic, by the fact that one of her friend confirmed the story about her being married and having an abortion and her problem with her husband.
Of course, if new evidence and not just rumors come to light and prove that her mother was telling the truth, then yes, like I said, he should pay, but nothing was proven, only that he's innocent.
+ in the new evidence shown, an audio of her talking about her husband and how she was mistreat by him when given and even a friend of hers said that the audio was true.
and last time I check, everyone is ''Innocent, until proven guilty'' but with netizen, it's the contrary and even if he's proven innocent, they won't believe it. For me, it's innocent until proven guilty and until now, the evidence only show that he's in fact, innocent. If new evidence and again, not rumors, come to light and show that he's guilty, I'll change my mind, but until then, he's innocnet.