Kim Se ui aka Garosero is refusing to comply with the police summons."Because I'm a general public and a fan...I…
Why they refuse? Simple, they have nothing and know that what they said was all lies. I knew they were lying, but now it confirm this for everyone, even his haters are mostly silent.
it's AI https://www.thestatesman.com/entertainment/whistleblower-admits-to-kim-sae-rons-recording-against-kim-soo-hyun-being-fake-1503430808.html?fbclid=IwY2xjawKLZOdleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETBxRktyRXNrb2ZITk1XN0FmAR4HdF71YikysFXheJBGSsZgH10BNlJyyliqJnGa7IA6lQ9RtOA7k4z1WCKh8w_aem_qYxnJRw67JbksvIuw4fYNg
Firstly, if these people had so much supposedly incriminating evidence, why didn't they release it when the scandal…
I agree with you. If they had true evidence, they would have just went to court, not released 1 evidence per 2 days or so. As of now, all their so called ''Evidence'' were proven false and that's why they went silent for almost two weeks and now they come with an audio (which also have been proven to be AI). But, honestly, it's not just the korean, but also people who don't believe in the ''innocent until proven guilty'' that badmouth them.
He didn't pick her up at the mall at random the day she turned 16, he met her when she was like nine dude. We…
Lie? You know that all actor are lying about their relationship? especially if the agency request them to do it in part of their contract. Analysis have proven the family evidence false. The text were forged, the picture of him cooking without pant were proven false, because they cover the part that was supposedly not wearing pants and the real picture was shown and he was wearing short or boxer (either way, the family provide false evidence) other have also been debunked supposedly portraying him, but it was in fact another guy (again, by analysis) and other picture where the family say she wasn't an adult, were in fact from when she was an adult, if you do simple research, you will discovers that the clothes or hat that they were on those picture were only available to both celebrities and non-celebrities after she became an adult.
you're the one who's acting like a brick wall. ALL the evidence the family provide were debunked and proven lies and yet, you still believe in their lies.
ngl I'm excited for this one. The first season was surprisingly good, I actually enjoyed the "over the top" fight…
well, since they follow the manhwa, pretty sure the second season will be safe, since like the season 1, they will probably follow the sequel of the first season in the manhwa.
He didn't pick her up at the mall at random the day she turned 16, he met her when she was like nine dude. We…
here we go again. what the family say is true (without proof), but when their so called ''evidence'' have proven false, then someone must have push someone to say it was false. Stop believing the first thing someone said. the family is lying.
Irrefutable? let me laugh. A lot of the picture have been debunked now and you are the one who still believe in those lies. In a lot of picture the family shared saying she wasn't an adult then, you can see her and him wearing clothes from brand that were only available in the time she was already an adult and on some picture, it have been shown that some of the picture were the guy is only seen from the back, that it wasn't even KSH. So, you're the one who should follow this advice, research more.
I support the truth and don't accused people based on rumors, I wait for evidence and until now, nothing was proven true. Unlike you, I'm not Judge, nor jury. it's innocent until proven guilty. not Guilty until proven innocent. But people like you don't know that principal.
https://www.thestatesman.com/entertainment/whistleblower-admits-to-kim-sae-rons-recording-against-kim-soo-hyun-being-fake-1503430808.html?fbclid=IwY2xjawKLZOdleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETBxRktyRXNrb2ZITk1XN0FmAR4HdF71YikysFXheJBGSsZgH10BNlJyyliqJnGa7IA6lQ9RtOA7k4z1WCKh8w_aem_qYxnJRw67JbksvIuw4fYNg
Analysis have proven the family evidence false. The text were forged, the picture of him cooking without pant were proven false, because they cover the part that was supposedly not wearing pants and the real picture was shown and he was wearing short or boxer (either way, the family provide false evidence) other have also been debunked supposedly portraying him, but it was in fact another guy (again, by analysis) and other picture where the family say she wasn't an adult, were in fact from when she was an adult, if you do simple research, you will discovers that the clothes or hat that they were on those picture were only available to both celebrities and non-celebrities after she became an adult.
So, you're the one who should follow this advice, research more.