onkisskh247

this not me defending cause clearly I’m not. there was a case of a an 18 year who got arrested for dating a 17 year old girl in Dubai (he was 4 months older). the couple were British and in the UK the age of consent is 16 meaning he wasn’t a criminal..but he got arrested in Dubai where the age of consent is 18. Now back to the topic..when they were dating the age of consent was 13 and she was 15..by their law she was old enough. By their law he didn’t do anything wrong HOWEVER..considering the maturity and how she was still a child he was wrong and should held accountable. the reason why I said she’s also at fault is because she took the advantage of the law to date an adult when she was a child…that’s my point.

of three years yes, what about the remaining three years when was she was an adult. who’s to blame if not both of them.

at that time the age of consent in SK was 13. by ur words if the brain isn’t fully developed by the age of 25 or so. why would countries make the age of consent 13-16???

hhhhhh so because I said both of them are at fault is me defending him? is it true though..both have faults BOTH

China is really good at digging things up

when they started dating the age of consent in their country was 13…now what?

The age of consent in South Korea was **13 years old** under the **Criminal Act Article 305** prior to its amendment in 2020. However, this low age of consent was largely theoretical and not reflective of actual legal enforcement. South Korea had additional laws, such as the **Act on the Protection of Children and Youth Against Sexual Abuse**, which provided stronger protections for minors under the age of 19. These laws effectively criminalized sexual activity with anyone under 19 in many contexts, especially when there was an imbalance of power (e.g., involving adults or authority figures).

In December 2020, South Korea amended its laws to explicitly set the age of consent at **16**, closing the gap between the outdated Criminal Act and the more protective youth laws. This change was part of broader reforms to strengthen protections for minors and modernize the legal framework.

So, while the age of consent was technically 13 in the past, it was not practically applied due to overlapping protections for minors.

The age of consent in South Korea was **13 years old** under the **Criminal Act Article 305** prior to its amendment in 2020. However, this low age of consent was largely theoretical and not reflective of actual legal enforcement. South Korea had additional laws, such as the **Act on the Protection of Children and Youth Against Sexual Abuse**, which provided stronger protections for minors under the age of 19. These laws effectively criminalized sexual activity with anyone under 19 in many contexts, especially when there was an imbalance of power (e.g., involving adults or authority figures).

In December 2020, South Korea amended its laws to explicitly set the age of consent at **16**, closing the gap between the outdated Criminal Act and the more protective youth laws. This change was part of broader reforms to strengthen protections for minors and modernize the legal framework.

So, while the age of consent was technically 13 in the past, it was not practically applied due to overlapping protections for minors.

where was I defending him dating a child? WHERE?. if you have nothing to argue about bug off. my point still stands, both are at faults.

search up the age of consent in South Korean when she was 15. you’ll be shocked.

I don’t recall saying that it was legal..ur point?

say what you said is true..but why is he denying the allegations? he’s denying everything why?

whether the article is real or not we’ll never know. when the aunt found out why didn’t she come out and report it? perhaps that would’ve prevented her from killing herself even though we don’t know what caused it..whether it’s the relationship or the money. all we know she was starting to get her foot back into acting and suddenly that happened. but that..where was her aunt who knew about it “later on” how “late”?? 2 days before she died ?yeah okay

u got that from google I know..she wasn’t 15 in those 6 years of them dating

for fuck sake..I know she was 15 yes a child but for 6 years she wasn’t always 15.

you didn’t mention her drunk driving and owning loads of debts that she couldn’t pay.

stop putting words in my mouth. she was a child he should arrested. as much as she was a kid she knew it was wrong. when she turned 18 she had the power to sue him but she didn’t.

how do you know her parents didn’t know? if her friends and her aunt knew then how did her parents not know? where’s the evidence that they didn’t know. they failed her, let her date an adult, let her drunk drive and now they wanna be parents again when she’s gone. as for him he should be arrested and there’s no way he’s getting away from this.

they were still dating she was 18..an adult remember that.

don’t use words that I’ll used against you. the age of concent is 18…she was legally an adult although 18 is a teenager. not to mention the fact that girls mature way earlier than boys. if you wanna bring science into this. U lack the knowledge of not acknowledging that under the law when she turned 18 she wasn’t being groomed anymore shocking right. When she went and drunk driving was she a minor or an adult..did she not know that it was wrong to drunk drive? she did..and still did it.