Luuta

Wow. Even the police obviously don't know about this. Tell them, or you could get charged with obstruction. Think of the poor family. What are you doing wasting your time on here, moaning? You should be ashamed, knowing all that and not telling the authorities. Have some civil pride, man!

The Bible can be made to support any argument, but i think this person is either a troll or a bot. I've reported it to Gold Medalist, in case it's someone involved in the case. Not that they'll pay any attention to me 😆.

Strangely, this is the second bot in two days I've come across. The other one friended me and then pretended to be the real Eun Bin. As usual, they couldn't provide proof "I don't need to prove who i am", blah blah. I asked them to contact Bandcamp, so my account there could get an official request from her. Proof provided, neither gives away their private emails. She sent me a private email address because somehow talking there is more private than private messaging here. I wasn't born yesterday 😆

Sad, though, that people can't have friendly chats and honest conversations anymore.

Says the man with the profile pic of a little girl, unless that's a man in drag? I'm beginning to think you wouldn't pass a Turing test. Prove to me you're not a bot. Answer this riddle: where is your proof that what you say is true? No sophistry. If you can't actually answer the question (not reply, but answer, as in provide the answer to an exam question) then you're a bot. You're not even human. You're certainly not worth anyone's time.

The riddle is that, if you WERE human, you'd not only be able to provide the proof, but you would be able to maintain conversational English without being insulting, but instead, with showing commonality and compassion, because that's why people who aren't really really sick, engage in conversations, to connect and chat. These two challenges make up the riddle. Prove me wrong.

You'll get another answer dodging the issue and insulting you again, instead. These trolls have been going around for years on all social sites. Once you realise they're deranged, there's nothing more you can say. They're just a machine trained to say the same outrageous things again and again and sod logic!

Ignorance certainly is a choice, lol, and so is making defamatory comments. SMH

Temu?!!! Hahahaha!!!! Lmao!! Hahahaha!!!

All trolls who make these accusations say, Google is free, look for yourself. But no, you made the accusations, it's up to you to back them up. Why should we go chasing fairies looking for stuff that doesn't exist? You were asked to prove it, stop making childish comments and prove it. It's that simple.

Just answer the question 🙄

I totally agree, MyWay, I think they're deranged, and at this point i don't think you can believe a word they say about their gender or anything else, for that matter.

His image is only tainted if short sighted judgemental people who judge and convict s person in their own heads before any criminal investigation and trial is carried out loudly tell everyone that he's still somehow guilty and should be treated as such

Thank goodness that, in court at least, you're innocent until proven guilty. Goldmedalist might not appreciate you continuing to defame him.

AI pictures are now indistinguishable from real photos.

Unless you have absolute proof, you should be more careful what you say. It can get you into a lot of legal trouble yourself.

I really don't see you saying these things as any better than any other crime, particularly if this leads to the victim killing himself. How is this different from what you're accusing him? Is it somehow ok for you to do it, but not a celebrity?

Oh my gawwwwd! I've only just finished watching Wonderfools, and Park Eun Bin is back again! Looking COMPLETELY different.

I wish i could chat with her over coffee for an hour, once a month, haha. She would be fab for my depression. Maybe not so healthy for her, though... Hmmm.. nah, i couldn't make her go through that. But doesn't everyone want to chat with her, see what she's really like in reality? Ok, it's not healthy, but, but... It's Park Eun Bin!!

I agree. Although emotive subjects like disability can be used cynically, to manipulate people, rather than from any sincerity, nothing IU has said and done suggest anything other than that she is a decent, caring human being.

what you said about taking any quote from the Bible to argue a position was exactly my point.

Regarding context, he's using quotes to justify his attack on another person, even though the source material wasn't about them. So, there is no context.

The only thing one can draw from the use of those quotes is to justify one's own actions and opinions, in the ABSENCE of proof, not as proof.

I really don't think you know what the word "context" means here. There is no "context", as born out by your inability to offer one. Just saying he right and I'm not, isn't a reasoned or reasonable argument.

Whilst answering this, I'm also reminded that this intellectual jibery about the proper use of the Bible hasn't got anything to do with IU. It's a meta argument about the Bible and belief, not about whether IU's donations are relatively selfless acts, or as he suggests, totally self interested and therefore not worthy of praise.

So when you say he has a point, just what point about IU do you mean, exactly, as your argument, Atom, has several humongous leaps in logic and reasoning, whilst providing zero proof of any of it. But it does show incredible bias.

Faith is not proof, btw, nor does quoting the Bible make it so.

I say this, because on the surface the random collection of words you've used suggest a certain authority on the subject, but when you take it a line at a time and see how those lines aren't cohesively connected, they make no sense at all.

From which i can only surmise that my arguments here are wasted, because you cannot reason with nonsense, literally NO sense.

I'll not comment any more on this line of discussion either. It's nothing to do with IU and the qualities or not of her deeds

I think IU's actions are commendable. I certainly don't think she deserves the criticism SanSebastian has thrown her way. He does need addressing, however, because he's attacking a person's character with zero proof. Quoting the Bible, as i have said, is not proof, and as i have demonstrated, is meaningless because you can make that Bible support any world view. Just as you said.

Who says I'm taking versus out of context and you're not? The quotes i mentioned go to the very heart of being a Christian. You can't pick and choose. The Bible isn't a book that only has one interpretation, or an official interpretation. Who on this planet can say they know what this God and the writers of the Bible meant? Are you saying that some other human being is telling everyone how we should read it? Aren't all human beings equal under god? What special relationship with God does this person have? Can s/he prove it?

If the Bible is a work of fact, then everyone is free to read into it what they want. Unless there is another book, a companion volume written by the saints, which instructs people how to read it.

If there isn't, anyone's interpretation and anyone's quotes are just as good as any other.

And if it's a work of fiction, then this conversion is pointless.

On the other hand, if it's a proscribed text, by a cult, no one should be paying it any attention because that can only be harmful.

I'm not a fan of Sophistry and fake Christianity.

I've said enough on this subject.

There are some people who profess to be blessed by god (and god), but a Christian friend of mine once said of me that i was a true Christian because i was compassionate and wanted the best for people. He said that's what separates people who go to church from real Christians. It's in the act, not the worship.

I'm agnostic. I don't believe in any organised religion, but I'm prepared to accept that there may be a creator of some kind. I think that if there is it's an absentee landlord. It's like, right, I've given you all this and now it's up to you. Protect it or destroy it, it's all on you.

This means humans can't easily be absolved of their bad deeds, and should always do their best to preserve the planet on which they live. That's if they want it to continue. Because no one is going to come along and get them out of the hole they make for themselves.

This is why i like your comment, Riri. IU is amazing, and even though i don't believe in God, I share your opinion of her generosity of spirit.

If you're saying, it's a generous amount, whatever currency you use, I agree.

Have you?

In John 8:7, Jesus stood up and responded to their question about the stoning, “Let him who is without sin among you, cast the first stone at her.”

And:
Matthew 7:3-5
“Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye."

Really. And you profess to be blessed by God? 🙄

That's a great point