Quantcast

Details

  • Last Online: 22 days ago
  • Gender: Female
  • Location: Canada
  • Contribution Points: 0 LV0
  • Roles:
  • Join Date: May 22, 2021

Friends

Replying to Baozi Buns Aug 14, 2025
No way of telling, as it's personal preference. This was the drama I was looking forward to this month the most,…
I will , thanks :)
Replying to nycfoodie Aug 14, 2025
Assuming ("biggest") fans of romance don't all think alike & in addition, I cannot read people's minds,…
Lmaooooo ignore that nycfoodie person , whoever is behind this account is everywhere in this comment section . They can’t help it … you have to ignore *them *🙃
Replying to nycfoodie Aug 14, 2025
Assuming ("biggest") fans of romance don't all think alike & in addition, I cannot read people's minds,…
Okay I will now ignore you cos I can tell that you feel real tender about this topic and you’re not the type we can engage with normally.
Replying to nycfoodie Aug 13, 2025
Assuming ("biggest") fans of romance don't all think alike & in addition, I cannot read people's minds,…
Idk if you were trying to be passive aggressive but this is not me trying to be shady towards romance enjoyers. I am solely asking if the story is also focused on other parts, if you cant answer why reply lmaoo Its not shade btw . I read your comment as a bit passive aggressive
Replying to esiom Aug 9, 2025
Maybe a bit of unpopular opinion, but if you have to excuse the way the characters act as "this was the way…
Exactly past the fluff there is not much to see in dramas like this and it’s why the Chinese public is demanding better from the industry.
On Legend of the Female General Aug 9, 2025
How disappointing… whole story reduced to a tool for romance to develop between the leads . Sad because the novel is a powerful women centric story that depicted a romance deeper than typical c dramas .
I know lofg had a lot of struggles behind the scenes but nonetheless I am disappointed and mourning what could have been .
Replying to Emmaline Zhang May 7, 2025
I am not a young fan… most of zhao lusi’s fans are drama fans 20 above yo.. and i am a 30++ mom with 2 children.…
Y’all don’t actually read you just project bad intent onto anything I say. You’re not engaging with my argument, just reacting to an image you’ve built of me as “malicious.” At that point, there’s no space for real conversation or nuance, and that’s exactly why my point keeps flying over your heads.
Replying to Emmaline Zhang May 7, 2025
I am not a young fan… most of zhao lusi’s fans are drama fans 20 above yo.. and i am a 30++ mom with 2 children.…
I’m not judging Zhao Lusi as a person. I’m specifically critiquing the framing and ethics of her documentary. I even acknowledged that she herself might have been pressured or exploited by the industry behind it
Replying to Nantou May 7, 2025
The documentary was rightfully insensitive and could be misinterpreted, even if it wasn't ZLS's intention. As…
Lmaoooo you’re crazyyyy and the internet scheme reference is you comparing everything I say to netizens general comments towards zls. You’re clearly a very unserious person tho I am done engaging with you in good faith
Replying to Nantou May 7, 2025
The documentary was rightfully insensitive and could be misinterpreted, even if it wasn't ZLS's intention. As…
“ so what if the documentary is marketing ” we have different values and views let’s end it here . You’re obviously not willing to engage with me openly and have presumed idea about me + you will make anything I say to be part of some sort of internet scheme so I will not bother to clarify again
it’s better we end this conversation.
You’re right go take a shower and move on with your day
Replying to Nantou May 7, 2025
The documentary was rightfully insensitive and could be misinterpreted, even if it wasn't ZLS's intention. As…
Nobody’s denying her right to feel, heal, or help. But when you turn other people’s pain into aesthetic content and wrap it around your own redemption story, you’re opening the door to public critique and rightfully so.

And let’s be real Zls might be used in all this too. You ever think maybe it’s her agency, her team, or the platform forcing her to go back to work to win from it .
I’m not dragging her as a person. I’m questioning the system that turns both her struggles and others’ suffering into this neatly packaged “inspiration.” If you film vulnerable people just to make yourself look deeper or more human, it’s fair to ask: who’s actually gaining from that?
Maybe it’s not about “attacking” her. Maybe she and the people shown are both being used in a system that knows
Replying to Nantou May 7, 2025
The documentary was rightfully insensitive and could be misinterpreted, even if it wasn't ZLS's intention. As…
Bringing up suicide to guilt-trip someone for offering critique is weird . I never said she shouldn’t help , I said help should be ethical, not exploitative. I with so many other netizens questioned the ethics of the documentary
There’s a difference between doing good and using others’ suffering as content. We can be exploitative even when we don’t mean to do so .
I’m critiquing methods, not attacking people. Holding public figures accountable doesn’t equate to driving anyone to harm and suggesting that it does is a deflection from the actual issue
performative charity at the expense of dignity.
Replying to LucyL May 6, 2025
Apparently you've no idea that the problem with this type of 'article' isn't about the actress per se. Users can…
Since it’s pointless to argue with someone because an opinion they have with the material presented in the documentary, you have now resulted to addressing only the editor part , which is where you win .
Replying to LucyL May 6, 2025
Apparently you've no idea that the problem with this type of 'article' isn't about the actress per se. Users can…
Once again , I have told you guys I only cared to address some of the conversations surrounding documentary , I’ve stood on it and never went back to addressing editor since my original comment I’ve only addressed the documentary and it’s content. You never replied to me regarding editor solely , YOU ADDRESSED THE CONTENT OF THE DOCUMENTARY AND WAS DEFENDING IT so naturally I replied to that part . If your comment was solely addressing this fact about editor I would’ve let you have it because I don’t know much about her . But my comment had 2 parts : addressing editor , second part addressing documentary content and why I agreed with critics . You chose to only address documentary content part . This let me know that your frustration was not only with me ignorantly defending editor BUT also with me not agreeing with the documentary. Don’t try to pretend that your frustration, especially as to my comments , is only with editor . It is , just as much , because I and some others agree with the critics regarding the documentary .
Replying to LucyL May 6, 2025
Apparently you've no idea that the problem with this type of 'article' isn't about the actress per se. Users can…
Never did I imply this , person here did tho by implying that because I have an opposite stance I’m a bot . You also came at me with a critical tone that I did not have for you , you even left with a quote that “ doing something is better than nothing at all ” . In this thread , you all were the one implying you know better than me . You all came at me with critical tones and grand quotes which I initially did not reserve for any of you . I’ve been pretty down to earth and open to even explaining the why to my comments, if you have this impression of me maybe it’s more personal… maybe because you are realizing there’s nothing to argue with me here . We can have different views and mine bother you, you are now realizing it’s a pointless argument that you’re having with me because me , a random person on the internet, bother you because of a comments that differs from your opinion and personal values 😀 you’re frustrated with me because I stand on what I said and I can defend and explain the why to my comments. I have my own convictions regarding this documentary and it greatly bother you so now you have to reduce me to an arrogant person who refuses to “ see the bigger picture ”.