Can someone explain to me how, at the beginning, some people say it’s not their first time entering those doors, and as far as I understood, no one can leave until they pass the level. So why don’t they know how to pass it if they’re in the same doors again?
I feel so lost. Ever since I saw the hype surrounding the series on social media, I've been waiting for it to…
In the series I Told Sunset About You, the acting is perfect, but the plot is overly dramatic and the story feels static. In KinnPorsche, the storyline is interesting and the action is great, but there are too many unexplained mistakes. In Shine, the acting is also excellent, and the chemistry between the actors is perfect, with an engaging plot but a lot of things are left unexplained by the end. As for Reset, the series is honestly too dramatic for me, even though it’s interesting. On the other hand, with Khemjira, the plot is very engaging and well developed from the start, the acting is great, and the chemistry between all the actors is excellent.
I see that I was somehow involved in this comment, so I’ll clarify. Many people on this pag are here because…
Okay, then this whole argument is unnecessary because I didn't mean to say that you're not intelligent by saying that I think differently because I read the novel or because I don't think I'm watching passively — I just wanted you to maybe see the series from my perspective. I have no problem with you thinking that Namping needs to improve his acting — I just don't think that myself. My only real issue was that when I share my opinion, it's seen as an attack, immature, or like I'm a crazy fan, but when someone else says something negative, it's considered fine. I have no other problem. At first, I also thought everyone needed to improve their acting because I wasn't used to Asian series and their acting style, but now I understand the difference, and I don't think I was less intelligent before — just that I started looking at things differently and stopped comparing.
I see that I was somehow involved in this comment, so I’ll clarify. Many people on this pag are here because…
It's not questioning your intelligence if someone says they think you didn’t understand something or that you're not connecting with the characters it doesn’t work that way.
What more immature is what you said, knowing something bothers someone, and than wanting to keep intentionally writing things like “Namping can’t act.” so they would be mad.
I wasn’t being rude in my last comment either, but you still assumed it was just a defense of the character that’s why I said we’re going in circles. I’m not talking about that the whole time. I’m just saying it’s not rude, immature, or an insult to someone’s intelligence if one person says an actor can’t act and someone else responds by saying maybe you didn’t understand the character if you think they acted badly.
I don’t understand if you didn’t want a conversation where someone gives you their perspective or tries to help you appreciate the show more, then did you just want to talk only about how badly someone acts and how the series drags and hate?
I see that I was somehow involved in this comment, so I’ll clarify. Many people on this pag are here because…
Again its about how you are insolting like we are not in the right mind and then come back and say they dont give me the right to say anything. This is just so rude of you. I dont want to have my account here anymore.
I see that I was somehow involved in this comment, so I’ll clarify. Many people on this pag are here because…
So this is what you call mature behavior? According to you, someone is only mature if they respect what you don’t like and avoid commenting on it — and if they do respond, they have to carefully tiptoe around your reactions, because apparently no one is allowed to say that you might not understand something others do.
I don’t agree with insulting someone’s intelligence at all — I’m just responding to the rest of what was said.
And as for the rest: Yes, he’s paying me to defend him, obviously. You see, you really don’t understand — the point isn’t about name-dropping, it’s about how your sentence is allowed to come across as a fact, and mine isn’t — as if anyone defending a different view is automatically biased.
This whole time you’ve been the one attacking and lashing out, while twisting it to look like others are the ones being aggressive. Honestly, this is the kind of circular conversation I have with my 12-year-old cousin.
I see that I was somehow involved in this comment, so I’ll clarify. Many people on this pag are here because…
Do you see my only problem now? You can say something like Namping need to do something but when I say you need to understand the character we are not mature.
I see that I was somehow involved in this comment, so I’ll clarify. Many people on this pag are here because…
Okay Joy, I understand what you're trying to say. I didn't mean to say that your opinion doesn't matter I just wanted to explain why I personally liked it, and what worked for me, using comparisons from the novel, and how I think I understood the character in the series on a deeper level.
If someone doesn’t like something, that’s valid — but if only people who disliked it were allowed to comment, then it would just turn into group hate, the same way it would be group praise if only fans could comment.
When we have conversations like this, even if we disagree, it helps both sides — people who liked it try to explain why and what should be understood, and people who didn’t like it explain their side too. That can actually help both perspectives. We can make a truce and agree that we all appreciate different things. Personally, I won’t respond to your comments with my opinions anymore if it’s going to upset you like this.
Can't people just have different opinion on this series or acting seriously????, why me saying Namping need to…
I see that I was somehow involved in this comment, so I’ll clarify. Many people on this pag are here because they like the show and have a different opinion. For example, out of all the negative comments, I only responded to two, and one of the reasons was that many others explained their thoughts, while your sentence simply said, and I quote: “This is draggy and Namping should improve his acting.” I replied by saying that he acts well, because your statement sounded like a fact rather than an opinion. Now again there’s anger and accusations, even though you're explaining how important it is to express different opinions—yet it seems like no one is allowed to respond to your comment unless they agree with you and also think it's bad. You yourself said you watched only 20 minutes of the episode, while it lasts over an hour, so people felt the need to explain things to you since you hadn’t even seen half of it (your own words). And again you are insolting we are not mature.
Yes exactly my point!!! Joy said Nampings acting is bad like thats a fact and then if you like it you are glazing him, like wtf? And than if I say his acting is great I dont let them have opinion. Its just funny and rediculous.
And I also want to say that I'm glad to respond to your comment because you're not being rude —you're presenting your opinion with reasoning, even though I don't agree with it.
I'm not speaking directly about you, but rather in general. I fully understand that everyone has different opinions and perceptions, but since everyone presents them as facts, I’ve also started commenting on those same 'facts' in the same way. Personally, I liked them so much that before this series I never even read the comments, let alone had my own profile here, and I'm really glad that most people like it too and that I'll have the chance to watch their new series in the future. I'm actually quite similar in character to Khem, which is why I defend him so much.
So what I'm tired of is that your opinion, which is in the minority that he can't act is treated as a fact, while our opinion, which is in the majority that he can act is considered just an opinion. I don't understand how that works?
Namping acted exactly as the character was described in the novel. Very few actors could have pulled it off this well. It’s much easier to play someone who’s constantly cheerful and talkative. But this role was about portraying a very timid, confused, and introverted boy who’s scared of everything. That kind of acting is hard to do without it coming off as cringe or even unintentionally funny. Namping is excellent at showing emotions without needing to say much, and he really makes you root for his character. Of course, the more an actor works, the more experience they gain, but regardless of that – he did an outstanding job. People should try to truly understand the characters and the emotions the series conveys, rather than watching it passively without connecting to it.
I have no problem with you thinking that Namping needs to improve his acting — I just don't think that myself.
My only real issue was that when I share my opinion, it's seen as an attack, immature, or like I'm a crazy fan, but when someone else says something negative, it's considered fine. I have no other problem.
At first, I also thought everyone needed to improve their acting because I wasn't used to Asian series and their acting style, but now I understand the difference, and I don't think I was less intelligent before — just that I started looking at things differently and stopped comparing.
What more immature is what you said, knowing something bothers someone, and than wanting to keep intentionally writing things like “Namping can’t act.” so they would be mad.
I wasn’t being rude in my last comment either, but you still assumed it was just a defense of the character that’s why I said we’re going in circles. I’m not talking about that the whole time. I’m just saying it’s not rude, immature, or an insult to someone’s intelligence if one person says an actor can’t act and someone else responds by saying maybe you didn’t understand the character if you think they acted badly.
I don’t understand if you didn’t want a conversation where someone gives you their perspective or tries to help you appreciate the show more, then did you just want to talk only about how badly someone acts and how the series drags and hate?
I don’t agree with insulting someone’s intelligence at all — I’m just responding to the rest of what was said.
And as for the rest: Yes, he’s paying me to defend him, obviously. You see, you really don’t understand — the point isn’t about name-dropping, it’s about how your sentence is allowed to come across as a fact, and mine isn’t — as if anyone defending a different view is automatically biased.
This whole time you’ve been the one attacking and lashing out, while twisting it to look like others are the ones being aggressive. Honestly, this is the kind of circular conversation I have with my 12-year-old cousin.
If someone doesn’t like something, that’s valid — but if only people who disliked it were allowed to comment, then it would just turn into group hate, the same way it would be group praise if only fans could comment.
When we have conversations like this, even if we disagree, it helps both sides — people who liked it try to explain why and what should be understood, and people who didn’t like it explain their side too. That can actually help both perspectives.
We can make a truce and agree that we all appreciate different things. Personally, I won’t respond to your comments with my opinions anymore if it’s going to upset you like this.
Now again there’s anger and accusations, even though you're explaining how important it is to express different opinions—yet it seems like no one is allowed to respond to your comment unless they agree with you and also think it's bad. You yourself said you watched only 20 minutes of the episode, while it lasts over an hour, so people felt the need to explain things to you since you hadn’t even seen half of it (your own words).
And again you are insolting we are not mature.