Look at the 3 young Korean guys. They all basically have the exact same hairstyle. Every single Kdrama actor has this same hairstyle.
Its like that's the only male hairstyle that's existed in South Korea for the past 15 years. When guys go to get a haircut, they don't even bother telling the hairstylist what style they want. They just sit down and the stylist starts cutting.
"Take for example the concubines of a king planning and plotting against each other. Do you think they do…
"You mean those current female presidents, senators, businesswomen, leaders ect.. That have only joined multiple layers of government within like the last 100 years?"
First you claimed that there were weren't any women leaders, now its "oh but its only in the last 100 years". Talk about moving the goalposts huh?
"Yes the situation improves, but it's not equality yet."
Yeah, you're right. Women have been, are, and will be presidents of countries, the most powerful job in every nation, but that's totally not equality 😁. Not to mention every other powerful position in society held by women.
"Google ''world leaders summit' sometime and look at group-pictures of countries leaders and tell me the gender-balance between men and women present. I hope that clears up some things."
Ok....and? That still doesn't erase the fact that there are women presidents, senators, business women etc. You've moved the goalposts from "there are no women in power, its a patriarchy" to "there's not enough women".
"That was indeed kind of a thing with concubines that they had extremely little agency. I mean, again, they were groomed into this role from their early teens and they quite literally were stuck in that palace for their entire lives."
So.....what? That means that they're not responsible for murder, cheating, etc? "Oh no, I'm stuck in this palace, oh well, I'm going to kill you now. Its totally not my fault, I was 'groomed'".
"Take for example the concubines of a king planning and plotting against each other. Do you think they do…
"So you can't understand concubines carry responsibility and they were also underage teenagers groomed into this lifestyle simultaneously?"
No I can't because you're claiming that they "carry responsibility" and at the same time "they were groomed" into doing "awful things and killing others". Did every single concubine do awful things and kill others? You're basically claiming that these women have no agency.
"As for the rest, that's a case by case thing. Some perpetuate the male-dominant systems and some fight against it I guess. Somehow this went from historical suffering of concubines to now modern politics. Queen Elizabeth with her funding of Andrew and Margaret with her defunding of childcare definitely did some women-unfriendly things."
Queen Elizabeth ruled during the 1500's, Renaissance era. I didn't know that that now qualifies as "modern politics" but ok.
"But the point is; a female leader doesn't equate a system that uplifts women in general (or a matriarchy). Because for that to happen, all layers of power need to have women in them"
Again, all of the current female presidents, senators, businesswomen, leaders, etc say hello.
"Take for example the concubines of a king planning and plotting against each other. Do you think they do…
You literally said "These women in a concubine situation were absolutely still responsible for their own actions". Then you say " but there's also an understanding needed on how environments form people as they grow into adulthood."
Either they're responsible or they're not. You can't have it both ways.
"I mean that's a broad statement; did they have influence? Sure. Were they more powerful than the king? In nearly all cases no. If the king wanted them executed, they would be dead."
From 1922 to 1924, Edith Wilson basically ran the U.S government while her husband, President Woodrow Wilson, was incapacitated after suffering a stroke but whatever.
"So a matriarchy would actually mean that women in general would hold powerful positions in society. Not just 1 female figurehead royal surrounded by men."
Queen Elizabeth and Margaret Thatcher were definitely not figure heads. All of the current female presidents are not figure heads. All of the powerful women (Senators, Congresswomen, etc) in governments across the world are not figureheads. All of the powerful women business women, actresses, etc are not figureheads.
"women are women's worst enemies"That's bullshit. That's just another way society shifts the blame back…
"Take for example the concubines of a king planning and plotting against each other. Do you think they do all that out of some natural hatred for women? No, they do it because they are trapped in a system where their survival and security depend on how much power do they have ultimately competing for a man's approval."
You're actually blaming men ? If only men didn't exist, women would never ever plot and compete against each other, 😂😂😂.
So you're saying women basically are not responsible for their own actions? What about the kingdoms that were ruled by Queens? Who will you blame for the "rivalries" amongst women in those cases?
He blocked you because you where spamming Bs at them.
"South-Africa benefited from the first Muslims being excellent craftspeople (sculptors, builders, etc.) who created a large part of what is now cultural heritage buildings & art."
Google AI says: "No, the premise that the first Muslims in South Africa were excellent craftspeople (sculptors, builders, etc.) who created a large part of the country's cultural heritage buildings and art is NOT ACCURATE".
Rather than fabricating lies, I suggest accepting the truth about muslim immigration.
God help you if he were to ever bite you!! He could literally rip off your arm with one bite!!
"Still haunting?"
😊😁😀😆😂🤣
Much better than cautiously hyped or crazily hyped.
Its like that's the only male hairstyle that's existed in South Korea for the past 15 years. When guys go to get a haircut, they don't even bother telling the hairstylist what style they want. They just sit down and the stylist starts cutting.
First you claimed that there were weren't any women leaders, now its "oh but its only in the last 100 years". Talk about moving the goalposts huh?
"Yes the situation improves, but it's not equality yet."
Yeah, you're right. Women have been, are, and will be presidents of countries, the most powerful job in every nation, but that's totally not equality 😁. Not to mention every other powerful position in society held by women.
"Google ''world leaders summit' sometime and look at group-pictures of countries leaders and tell me the gender-balance between men and women present. I hope that clears up some things."
Ok....and? That still doesn't erase the fact that there are women presidents, senators, business women etc. You've moved the goalposts from "there are no women in power, its a patriarchy" to "there's not enough women".
"That was indeed kind of a thing with concubines that they had extremely little agency. I mean, again, they were groomed into this role from their early teens and they quite literally were stuck in that palace for their entire lives."
So.....what? That means that they're not responsible for murder, cheating, etc? "Oh no, I'm stuck in this palace, oh well, I'm going to kill you now. Its totally not my fault, I was 'groomed'".
No I can't because you're claiming that they "carry responsibility" and at the same time "they were groomed" into doing "awful things and killing others". Did every single concubine do awful things and kill others? You're basically claiming that these women have no agency.
"As for the rest, that's a case by case thing. Some perpetuate the male-dominant systems and some fight against it I guess. Somehow this went from historical suffering of concubines to now modern politics. Queen Elizabeth with her funding of Andrew and Margaret with her defunding of childcare definitely did some women-unfriendly things."
Queen Elizabeth ruled during the 1500's, Renaissance era. I didn't know that that now qualifies as "modern politics" but ok.
"But the point is; a female leader doesn't equate a system that uplifts women in general (or a matriarchy). Because for that to happen, all layers of power need to have women in them"
Again, all of the current female presidents, senators, businesswomen, leaders, etc say hello.
Either they're responsible or they're not. You can't have it both ways.
"I mean that's a broad statement; did they have influence? Sure. Were they more powerful than the king? In nearly all cases no. If the king wanted them executed, they would be dead."
From 1922 to 1924, Edith Wilson basically ran the U.S government while her husband, President Woodrow Wilson, was incapacitated after suffering a stroke but whatever.
"So a matriarchy would actually mean that women in general would hold powerful positions in society. Not just 1 female figurehead royal surrounded by men."
Queen Elizabeth and Margaret Thatcher were definitely not figure heads. All of the current female presidents are not figure heads. All of the powerful women (Senators, Congresswomen, etc) in governments across the world are not figureheads. All of the powerful women business women, actresses, etc are not figureheads.
Case closed then.
" But if you were thrown into a survival-game like Alice in Borderland or Squid Game I assume you'd also lose a bit of your own humanity. "
I've never seen Alice in Borderland, so no comment. No one was "thrown into" the Squid Game. They willingly joined it.
"As for queens, for the small amount we've had in earths history, they just join a pre-existing system."
Many, many, many Kings were ineffectual rulers and the kingdoms were actually run by the Queens.
"Thinking that just because there's a female ruler that there is suddenly some kind of a matriarchy is very naive"
Except having a female ruler is one of, if not the most central, aspect of a matriarchy but whatever.
You're actually blaming men ? If only men didn't exist, women would never ever plot and compete against each other, 😂😂😂.
So you're saying women basically are not responsible for their own actions? What about the kingdoms that were ruled by Queens? Who will you blame for the "rivalries" amongst women in those cases?
Not even arabic countries want arabs in THEIR countries which is why no one wants to take in the palestinians.
Japanese or arabs?
Case closed.
You're actually comparing the middle east to Japan?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Google AI says: "No, the premise that the first Muslims in South Africa were excellent craftspeople (sculptors, builders, etc.) who created a large part of the country's cultural heritage buildings and art is NOT ACCURATE".
Rather than fabricating lies, I suggest accepting the truth about muslim immigration.
I mean this sincerely.
She's literally camouflaged in with the white background.
I still have the teeth marks.