hahah. its not my favourite anime. which is detective conan. but it is definitely one of my favourite animes!!! i am so looking forward to someone subbing hte movie. omg
0 0
P
OnDeprecated profile comment•May 8, 2013
ProfileDeprecated profile comment
I would like to repay your kindness. This is a list of detective based dramas that are at the very minimum good, if not great.
Galileo (you have watched Suspect X and watching Galileo 2)
Sennyu Tantei Tokage (ongoing, pretty good so far)
Hero (excellent drama, Takuya Kimura as a prosecutor),
Trick (fantastic series, Abe Hiroshi as a physicist, w/ Nakamura Yukie as a "magician")
Kezikou Spec 2 (great series, Erika Toda as a detective)
Infernal Affairs (world class movie series from HK, spawning Hollywood production)
Lucky Seven (great hilarious w/ Matsumoto Jun)
Mr Brain (currently on hold, can only get better, not a classic, but very well made nonetheless)
Maou (fantastic detective thriller)
i picked this up on recommendation from someone on mdl.
the ending was a little confusing. i dont really understand what he was trying to ask her. it was ok. her personality was interesting
i couldnt really appreciate the beauty of this drama. it was too slow paced, a little lack of direction, too slice of life, but a very unique and perhaps abstract viewpoint. the fantasy of kuna was hard to comprehend, particularly the importance it gave to the film. the actors seemed to fulfill their roles well, but there was minimal characterization, and if any, was unsurprising. i was surprised i managed to finish this, but it did run mostly in the background as i surfed. and eventually it was much ado about nothing.
wasnt super excited from this because the story had already come full circle, it wasnt anything special. just unnecessary elongation with no development in plot.
lol. that 2/21 review from bladsuppe must have been the worst rated ive seen. btw this drama is ridiculously overrated…
to associate that the excellent review was received poorly by the masses and thus understand that the drama is poor.
rather than misinterpreting a comment and trying to stubbornly defend a review that has already been deemed by a relatively significant number to be poor, it is important to recognize that it is perfectly fine for people to voice their opinions, especially on a drama site where opinions are the only thing that exist, but also that bad reviews are part and parcel of getting to the point of writing good reviews. and that bad reviews are JUST as useful and helpful for future mdlers. INSTEAD of cherry coating a review clearly disagreed by the mass majority.
you are welcome ladyfaile. i always had some respect for you. i hope you can now comprehend my initial comment in its entirety. i am not usually so kind as to elaborate everthing so kindly. because really, its obvious.
lol. that 2/21 review from bladsuppe must have been the worst rated ive seen. btw this drama is ridiculously overrated…
you are suggesting, the rating will still at least be representative of the population on mdl, and be of use in a global perspective.
in response to your last paragraph, then why are you trying to attack the review, or attack my comment that comments on the feedback awarded to the review at question?
if anything, whereas my comment was basically a summary of the review, your comment was a direct antagonism towards another user's opinion, in addition to misinterpreting the comment and also determining your opinion to be of greater value.
the fact cannot be avoided that the comment was received poorly by the mdl public and now i will share my opinion rather than state a fact, that the review has been deemed bad at this current point in time and yet is still valuable to mdlers who might be interested in picking up the drama. from the information provided thus far, they would be able
lol. that 2/21 review from bladsuppe must have been the worst rated ive seen. btw this drama is ridiculously overrated…
thats really weird.
why would tracking what people liked and disliked not be useful? it would be of absolute and in fact critical importance in terms of determining how valuable their evaluation of a drama is with respect to our tastes.
its hilarious how you jump to conclusions. never did i criticize the review of the drama. i merely stated that it was the worst rated review i have seen. u have inadvertently committed a freudian slip and demonstrated your own criticism of the review.
in addition, why are you alluding to controlling how people rate dramas? that is a terrible idea and would defeat the entire purpose of having drama ratings in the first place. although many have discussed the accuracy of drama evaluations where the raters are not double blinded and randomized, i still believe strongly that with a large enough sample size that is not further non-randomly selected like
lol. that 2/21 review from bladsuppe must have been the worst rated ive seen. btw this drama is ridiculously overrated at 7.29... 11 people actually rated it 10... thats why ive always been trying to push for more statistics and transparency. it would be important to see which people are rating this 10...
Galileo (you have watched Suspect X and watching Galileo 2)
Sennyu Tantei Tokage (ongoing, pretty good so far)
Hero (excellent drama, Takuya Kimura as a prosecutor),
Trick (fantastic series, Abe Hiroshi as a physicist, w/ Nakamura Yukie as a "magician")
Kezikou Spec 2 (great series, Erika Toda as a detective)
Infernal Affairs (world class movie series from HK, spawning Hollywood production)
Lucky Seven (great hilarious w/ Matsumoto Jun)
Mr Brain (currently on hold, can only get better, not a classic, but very well made nonetheless)
Maou (fantastic detective thriller)
the ending was a little confusing. i dont really understand what he was trying to ask her. it was ok. her personality was interesting
not sure what the entire point of the movie was.
way too abstract for me.
off i go to read the plot.
rather than misinterpreting a comment and trying to stubbornly defend a review that has already been deemed by a relatively significant number to be poor, it is important to recognize that it is perfectly fine for people to voice their opinions, especially on a drama site where opinions are the only thing that exist, but also that bad reviews are part and parcel of getting to the point of writing good reviews. and that bad reviews are JUST as useful and helpful for future mdlers. INSTEAD of cherry coating a review clearly disagreed by the mass majority.
you are welcome ladyfaile. i always had some respect for you. i hope you can now comprehend my initial comment in its entirety. i am not usually so kind as to elaborate everthing so kindly. because really, its obvious.
in response to your last paragraph, then why are you trying to attack the review, or attack my comment that comments on the feedback awarded to the review at question?
if anything, whereas my comment was basically a summary of the review, your comment was a direct antagonism towards another user's opinion, in addition to misinterpreting the comment and also determining your opinion to be of greater value.
the fact cannot be avoided that the comment was received poorly by the mdl public and now i will share my opinion rather than state a fact, that the review has been deemed bad at this current point in time and yet is still valuable to mdlers who might be interested in picking up the drama. from the information provided thus far, they would be able
why would tracking what people liked and disliked not be useful? it would be of absolute and in fact critical importance in terms of determining how valuable their evaluation of a drama is with respect to our tastes.
its hilarious how you jump to conclusions. never did i criticize the review of the drama. i merely stated that it was the worst rated review i have seen. u have inadvertently committed a freudian slip and demonstrated your own criticism of the review.
in addition, why are you alluding to controlling how people rate dramas? that is a terrible idea and would defeat the entire purpose of having drama ratings in the first place. although many have discussed the accuracy of drama evaluations where the raters are not double blinded and randomized, i still believe strongly that with a large enough sample size that is not further non-randomly selected like