This is funny cuzz half are like my favs and they do be mostly at the bottom but for the first I don't think Park Shin Hye is bad at all but I do get why she is at top 😭😭😭🙏🏻
I agree! They ruined Usagi's personality completely. Rei was the only character whom I wanted to survive, also…
Honestly like I disliked they forgot stuff its like they forgot their healing process and all... hence Usagi just wasn't there no more 😭 I WISH they went into is differently. Yeah Rei is just awesome!!!
also... the whole point of the face card was to compete... the face... so where tf was the joker. like don't pmo.…
Its Banda and that other guy who defeated Jack of Hearts. Its just Banda was a horrible joker 😭 I dont think whoever wrote this part had a good idea on how to connect the joker to the plot 💀 so we got literally just a remake but a horrible one ....
just finished s2 and i dont see why this season is necessary tbh... im thinking of sitting this one out but do…
Definitely not worth the watch 😭 I mean if they wanted to do smth with the joker card it could've been done waay better like as the card is a master of them all can be legit any card it wants or all in one! And they could have played it as the characters never came back to real world and it was like a psychological game by the joker 😮💨 but they killed it in every way possible!!!! just no
Rei is lwk the only person that was interesting and also witty!!! Everyone else was just lacking braincells 💀 I dont even wanna mention Usagi tf was that? Honestly, REI WAS CARRYING THE WHOLE SEASON!!!
I mean nice theory on that but if it was consent driven it would have been better ✋🏻
You didn't even try to explain to see if I have limited intelligence or not. I said what I said. You were the first to say I didn't understand him and I can say the same for you. Afterall interpretation is based on perspective.
And I did software engineering 🤷🏻♀️again you might have done philosophy but that is the most easiest subject I had in high school. And what I have learned through it is that is bunch of improvising and there is no ground solid proof to any of the stuff half of them said. 😮💨 I could say the same stuff they did and just say its philosophy.
I mean nice theory on that but if it was consent driven it would have been better ✋🏻
As I said I really have nothing against the series whatsoever 🤷🏻♀️ ofc its fiction thats why I don't have a problem with how it ended up. What I have problem with is those who romanticised it and found it cutesy 🥰 when it isn't 🤷🏻♀️
I am not saying you found it cutesy or anything. I get the part of your theory which is a really great analogy and I can partially see the beauty you are talking about, but I can't take that detail to call it beautiful and so on..when there is a huge negative part to it. Just because he had good intentions it doesn't make him any better.
I understood Aristotle very well, but I could say that you didn't as you also use AI to defend a part in your name.
As you said we all have opinions: some can dislike it and some can like it. I watch diverse genres because I go by "at least try it first to know if u like it or not". I believe you cant criticise something if you never watched other genres as well.
Regardless, we kept going on about this when I initially said YOUR THEORY would have been better if there was consent.
I mean nice theory on that but if it was consent driven it would have been better ✋🏻
I don't think there was anything beautiful about the abuser. I am not even gonna blame the victim. But the abuser? He didn't just have flaws or some complexities that Aristotle was even talking about. What he did was immoral and purely ill. Nothing could justify what he did.
The thing I have the issue is with how they call the ending a happy ending. Maybe for the victim is better that the sufferings ended, but it sad that he chose that path. Its just like Vegas and Pete and I find nothing cute about them 😭
I mean nice theory on that but if it was consent driven it would have been better ✋🏻
I said your theory would make more sense and be BETTER if it was driven with consent and not without. I never claimed that the drama would have been better or worse.
Manner of death has murder, but it isn't between two of them. Its not the main character falling in love with his abuser. As I said in some cases even in real life in order to get rid of a monster you have to be one as well. Same for vincenzo and the glory. 🤷🏻♀️ They were based on revenge. Would I have done it? No. But Im glad she did and he did.
You never said that I condone murder, but you said WE so I felt the need to clarify I DONT.
You never said you found it pleasent to watch, but you asked the question whether it mattered to have consent in fiction. I never claimed you found it pleasent either, but I did claim the fact that by asking the question you obviously think that consent doesn't matter in fiction. I responded with my answer that it DOES MATTER.
I mean nice theory on that but if it was consent driven it would have been better ✋🏻
Idk wym I never accept murder 😭✋🏻the only time I would accept it is in self defence and if you need to become a monster to end another one while u know u are only a monster to monsters☝🏻 but in intimate moments??? fuck yeah consent matters everywhere it does 😭 even in murder obviously all those will have consequences so what bizzare comment are you even making 💀 Just because its fictional it doesn't make it sweet
1 
7 
And I did software engineering 🤷🏻♀️again you might have done philosophy but that is the most easiest subject I had in high school. And what I have learned through it is that is bunch of improvising and there is no ground solid proof to any of the stuff half of them said. 😮💨 I could say the same stuff they did and just say its philosophy.
I am not saying you found it cutesy or anything. I get the part of your theory which is a really great analogy and I can partially see the beauty you are talking about, but I can't take that detail to call it beautiful and so on..when there is a huge negative part to it. Just because he had good intentions it doesn't make him any better.
I understood Aristotle very well, but I could say that you didn't as you also use AI to defend a part in your name.
As you said we all have opinions: some can dislike it and some can like it. I watch diverse genres because I go by "at least try it first to know if u like it or not". I believe you cant criticise something if you never watched other genres as well.
Regardless, we kept going on about this when I initially said YOUR THEORY would have been better if there was consent.
The thing I have the issue is with how they call the ending a happy ending. Maybe for the victim is better that the sufferings ended, but it sad that he chose that path. Its just like Vegas and Pete and I find nothing cute about them 😭
Manner of death has murder, but it isn't between two of them. Its not the main character falling in love with his abuser. As I said in some cases even in real life in order to get rid of a monster you have to be one as well. Same for vincenzo and the glory. 🤷🏻♀️ They were based on revenge. Would I have done it? No. But Im glad she did and he did.
You never said that I condone murder, but you said WE so I felt the need to clarify I DONT.
You never said you found it pleasent to watch, but you asked the question whether it mattered to have consent in fiction. I never claimed you found it pleasent either, but I did claim the fact that by asking the question you obviously think that consent doesn't matter in fiction. I responded with my answer that it DOES MATTER.