Forhad Ahmed Niloy

Sometimes this kind of thing happens. A very honest officer goes against the company's decision and exposes the internal corruption. As a result, the company gets punished but that honest officer loses his job. This is called whistle blowing.
No matter what, a whistle blower always loses his job and never gets hired in any company in the future. No matter if he exposes corruption or not, if he honest or not, if he is doing that for the greater good or not, he is always blacklisted by the company. Because he hurts the company's interest.
A company is paying you to protect its interest but not for social service. If your exposal hurts the company's image, you're the enemy of the company. You are a betrayer to the company. And no other company will hire a betrayer. That's the unwritten rule.

The point is- CX is a whistle blower, a betrayer to the company. If that happens in real life, she will immediately get fired by the company after the 1st meeting with the lawyer. It's a fiction, it's a drama, so it's maybe okay in here. But don't do that in real life. You'll ruin your life. 🥺🥺

She didn't. But if she wasn't a cargo driver but a pilot of a passenger plane, she may have put their life in danger.
When she landed the last time as a cargo driver, it was a risky move. ML told her about that. He is a passenger plane pilot. He knows that landing could be dangerous if it were a passenger plane. But she refuses to listen to him. She refused to admit her fault.
If she directly transferred to the flight section with that mindset, she may put people's lives in danger through her reckless driving. Because she is not aware of her mistake.
ML told her again and again that there's no problem with her technique and skill. Her problem is phycological and that can't be made up with skill. She was too irresponsible to be a pilot of a passenger plane.

He is the CEO. So, he can say that I don't want profit, I want honor!
But you are an employee. You can't say that. A company hires you for profit, not for morale. But if your boss says that's okay, then it's okay.

He didn't leave CX on the plane. CX sends him out because he's freaking the drunk passenger. No one on the outside didn't know what's going on inside. So, he went to get help. Watch that episode again please.

She is too moral that she is helping an out person to sue her own company. She is dreaming of being a captain.
She is literally saying goodbye to her dream, her career because of emotion. If I was her CEO, I'd also fire her. 😐😐😐

To be honest, how CX acts that not proper. It may be considered as Whistle-Blowing. She is too emotional for a corporate fight.

Yes, it's definitely a good drama.
ML and FL, they both have feelings for each other. But ML is a pure jerk. So, they haven't ended up together yet. Maybe in epi 37-38 they will get together, or maybe in the last episode! But you'll love their slow burn flirtation during the whole show.
There is an SML but FL brother-zoned him. So, no triangle yet.
Definitely continue it.

Also Le coupe de foude!

I got your point.
Let's just say, we all love to be reckless. While driving motorcycle I personally love to speed up on a dangerous level. It's just taking a challenge with yourself. And more or less we all do that sometimes.
Now let's analysis her character. She was a cargo plane driver. Her co-pilot was one of the most senior and experienced pilots of her company. He treated her like his own daughter so he looked up many rules. Because he trusted her, her capability. He had confidence that even if she acts reckless sometimes, in the end she won't screw up.
She transferred from cargo dpt to passenger dpt. She had no intension but it was the company's decision so unavoidable. She is not familiar with this environment. She always delt with cows and goats as a cargo driver, but she has no idea how to delt with people. So, she made mistakes again and again.
Then again, she was hoping for a promotion and to be a captain. But she got demoted to two positions!! We all have a tendency that we can't see our own fault. She was no different. She was immature. She was not ready to admit her fault.
But people change. She changes. She became mature. She became a decent pilot. She worked hard and became one of the highly influential pilots of the company.
Please continue to watch. You'll love her growth. You'll love her character. 🥺🥺

In MOMO, he was a villain!! 😐😐

He has a solid ground why he is against female pilot in his dept. He also provided proof that 90% of airlines declining female pilot. Because a company invest a lot to make a decent pilot. But during the marriage and childbirth a female employee waste almost a year. If you stay away from a skill depended job almost a year, you'll definitely lose your touch. Moreover, most of them do not retuen even after 1 year because child needs them. So, it's not profitable for a company. He showed proof to the board why he is against it.

Sending CX to ground duty was a mistake. But she needed it. It was definitely her fault. She didn't handle the matter professionaly but emotionally. And she was so angry at GNT that she didn't want to admit her fault at all. One month is ground duty make her a more stable, decent, professional pillot. Besides, because of this she was able to understand GNT's true intension towards her. So you can say, he indirectly help CX! Without that punishment, CX would never able to understand GNT properly.

Inviting CX to the party was also his fault. He hadn't any bad intension like gaining something. He was not alone. NZ was also there. He was just buttering up the board of directors.

So, until epi 30, I didn't find him very unreasonable. Febricating evidence was in epi 31. It was after I sentenced that comment. So that won't count.

Of course he is in fault now. It's his true nature. He just reviled it in epi 31. Now I'm considering him as a true villian.

He has a solid ground why he is against female pilot in his dept. He also provided proof that 90% of airlines declining female pilot. Because a company invest a lot to make a decent pilot. But during the marriage and childbirth a female employee waste almost a year. If you stay away from a skill depended job almost a year, you'll definitely lose your touch. Moreover, most of them do not retuen even after 1 year because child needs them. So, it's not profitable for a company. He showed proof to the board why he is against it.

Sending CX to ground duty was a mistake. But she needed it. It was definitely her fault. She didn't handle the matter professionaly but emotionally. And she was so angry at GNT that she didn't want to admit her fault at all. One month is ground duty make her a more stable, decent, professional pillot. Besides, because of this she was able to understand GNT's true intension towards her. So you can say, he indirectly help CX! Without that punishment, CX would never able to understand GNT properly.

Inviting CX to the party was also his fault. He hadn't any bad intension like gaining something. He was not alone. NZ was also there. He was just buttering up the board of directors.

So, until epi 30, I didn't find him very unreasonable. Febricating evidence was in epi 31. It was after I sentenced that comment. So that won't count.

Of course he is in fault now. It's his true nature. He just reviled it in epi 31. Now I'm considering him as a true villian.

I said up until epi 30, that happened in epi 31. I didn't know that when I sentenced that comment.

Up until epi 30, Mr. Jiang Tao was a pretty reasonable team leader.
He is a great pilot. He has a great career record. He made the current safety regulation. He contributed a lot to the company.
Yes, some of his decision is controversial, especially regarding female pilot. But from his POV, he is not wrong either. It's not that he does hold grudge against female pilot. It is just that he is always thinking about the company.
He is a villain to us regarding his collision with CX. But he is a pretty reasonable villain.
Let's see what happens next.

Thank you.
They really made the scene over dramatized. 😂😂

I can't understand why nobody gets what I wanted to say!
The kid is in a well or hole. He is just under a wooden house. It's not on fire, it's not under in landslide. The house collapsed but people still could enter the house. At one of them entered at the last moment.
But the way they shot the scene, it felt like they were crossing a river via a broken wooden bridge which may collapse at any time! But that was not the case, right?
I know they are not first responders, they are not trained to do rescue op. But it's not rocket science. It's a matter of common sense. And people with minimum common sense won't act like that in a real-life situation.
I am saying they over-dramatized the whole situation. Their intention was great but it became a funny scene. It's not the character's fault. The production company made the mistake.

I can't understand why nobody gets what I wanted to say!
The kid is in a well or hole. He is just under a wooden house. It's not on fire, it's not under in landslide. The house collapsed but people still could enter the house. At one of them entered at the last moment.
But the way they shot the scene, it felt like they were crossing a river via a broken wooden bridge which may collapse at any time! But that was not the case, right?
I know they are not first responders, they are not trained to do rescue op. But it's not rocket science. It's a matter of common sense. And people with minimum common sense won't act like that in a real-life situation.
I am saying they over-dramatized the whole situation. Their intention was great but it became a funny scene. It's not the character's fault. The production company made the mistake.

I can't understand why nobody gets what I wanted to say!
The kid is in a well or hole. He is just under a wooden house. It's not on fire, it's not under in landslide. The house collapsed but people still could enter the house. At one of them entered at the last moment.
But the way they shot the scene, it felt like they were crossing a river via a broken wooden bridge which may collapse at any time! But that was not the case, right?
I know they are not first responders, they are not trained to do rescue op. But it's not rocket science. It's a matter of common sense. And people with minimum common sense won't act like that in a real-life situation.
I am saying they over-dramatized the whole situation. Their intention was great but it became a funny scene.

They are flight crew, man! They are not just some random office workers. They have all kinds of physical and theoretical training in case of emergency.

And that's not my point exactly. The way they shoot a simple matter in a serious mode, I find it's just funny.

That rescue operation is epi 23 is so funny. It seems like the writer didn't see any rescue op in her life at all! The whole set up was so childish. We who work in the heavy industry, the set looks less dangerous than our daily task! They are giving their life in such a scene! That just felt so unreal to me!!

Is it only me or anyone else here also think that FL (Crystal Liu) is look like K-actress Shin Se Kyung (FL of Run On, Bride of Water God)?