was the woman blind? if he didn't use protection say no.As long as it's not a forceful or manipulative situation…
I don’t need anyone’s permission to comment or share my opinion. And no, she wasn’t “blind” — she was drunk, which already makes it a forced situation. Consent given under intoxication is not consent. Please don’t comment on a story you clearly haven’t even watched properly. I’m exercising my freedom of speech, not asking for approval. If my comment bothers you, you’re free to ignore it instead of trying to police what others can or cannot say.
As I recall, nobody in the drama even mentions unprotected sex, and that’s exactly the problem. The story doesn’t acknowledge it, doesn’t place responsibility on the male lead, and certainly doesn’t show him apologizing for it. He’s rich—yet he couldn’t “afford” a cheap condom? (Sarcasm intended.)
And about both of them being drunk: Two drunk people having sex isn’t automatically okay. Consent becomes murky when judgment is impaired by alcohol. If only one of them were drunk, most people would call that rape. But because both are intoxicated, the show treats it like it’s fine and normal. That’s a dangerous message, and it’s exactly the kind of plot device that lets real-world rapists exploit loopholes in law and perception.
I’ll decide where I post my opinion—review or comments. I have the right to critique a drama however I see fit. Categorizing my opinion into sections you’re comfortable with doesn’t invalidate it.
Now, about the story itself.
After 4 episodes they’re not married, yes—but his first response to the pregnancy wasn’t “what do you want?” or “how can I support you?” It was “I’ll marry you.” Not a question. A declaration. That already frames control, not choice.
You keep saying it’s “her choice,” but choice isn’t just words. Does she actually have freedom?
Can she choose another man if she wants?
Can she continue her career without his interference?
Can she live her private life without being monitored or questioned by him?
What’s shown so far says no.
He inserts himself into her life, disrupts her work, questions her relationships, and claims emotional authority over her body and future—when they aren’t even friends, let alone partners.
And the biggest issue you’re overlooking: he didn’t use protection without telling her. That isn’t a minor flaw. That’s a serious ethical violation.
Then the drama reframes him as “supportive” because he helps her through the suffering he directly caused. Supporting someone through consequences you created doesn’t erase the harm.
It’s like this: If I cut off your legs and then offer to carry you for the rest of your life, does that make me a good person? Especially when you never wanted me—a stranger—in your life at all?
No. You don’t get moral credit for “support” that creates lifelong dependency and strips someone of autonomy.
The FL is forced into a cruel moral dilemma:
carry the pregnancy and sacrifice her future
or abort and carry lifelong emotional guilt
Then the ML says “it’s your choice” while standing there with expectations, pressure, and implied judgment. That’s not freedom—that’s emotional coercion disguised as kindness.
This isn’t about the ML being imperfect. It’s about the narrative normalizing deeply problematic behavior and asking viewers to accept it as romance because he later acts gentle.
People are free to enjoy the drama. But criticism of its themes, power dynamics, and ethics belongs in a review, not buried in a comments section just because it’s uncomfortable.
lol this is drama? not documentary...reality = drama?wakeup
It’s just a drama” isn’t a free pass. Wake up—this isn’t a medieval fantasy or some god-realm costume show. It’s set in the modern world, using real-life jobs, laws, and relationships. If the story is based on real-life scenarios, it will be judged by real-life standards. You can’t defend harmful behavior as romance and then hide behind fiction when people call it out. Normalizing toxic relationships, excusing abuse, or framing lack of consent as destiny isn’t harmless entertainment. Stories shape mindsets. Enjoy drama, but wake up from the fantasy that every toxic relationship is “true love.” Drama doesn’t erase basic morality.
you’re right maybe this is coming from the whole birthrate being low in Korea and maybe this is their way of…
Thanks for understanding my point — I really appreciate that. And yes, I completely agree that having babies in itself is not wrong at all. South Korea genuinely does need to increase its birth rate if it wants to sustain its society and diaspora in the long run. That concern is valid. What feels deeply wrong, though, is how some of these dramas choose to portray it. Impregnating a stranger because “things just happened,” not using protection — when condoms are hardly expensive even for a poor CEO or a powerful president — and then framing the pregnancy as fate or romance is irresponsible storytelling. Pressuring a woman to carry the pregnancy out of obligation, fear, or social pressure is even worse. And showing her abandoning her life, dreams, and career as if that’s the natural or noble outcome feels like a very outdated, almost medieval mindset — reducing women to child-making machines rather than full human beings with agency. So yes, romance audiences may enjoy it without questioning the logic, but that doesn’t mean the messaging isn’t problematic. Wanting more babies is understandable; promoting it through coercion, negligence, and glorified power imbalance is not.
yes and i saw a two timer cheating on her handicap husband
Well I think you don't understand it She was two timing him(her husband) when she was dating her bf (ml) They got in accident he becomes handicapped trying to save her, She lost her memory And her father married her to him, and she married him to take responsibility for his situation Then when she meet her ex, and regained her memory she started cheating and then abandon her husband, They were husband and wife for years and she had no empathy or sympathy for her husband And no regard for father son relationship her son and husband had built Just because she found biological father of her son... She and her strong rich boyfriend bullied an handicapped man And his wife and son were stolen....
And no, she wasn’t “blind” — she was drunk, which already makes it a forced situation. Consent given under intoxication is not consent.
Please don’t comment on a story you clearly haven’t even watched properly.
I’m exercising my freedom of speech, not asking for approval. If my comment bothers you, you’re free to ignore it instead of trying to police what others can or cannot say.
He’s rich—yet he couldn’t “afford” a cheap condom? (Sarcasm intended.)
And about both of them being drunk:
Two drunk people having sex isn’t automatically okay. Consent becomes murky when judgment is impaired by alcohol. If only one of them were drunk, most people would call that rape. But because both are intoxicated, the show treats it like it’s fine and normal. That’s a dangerous message, and it’s exactly the kind of plot device that lets real-world rapists exploit loopholes in law and perception.
If you want to see someone who actually articulates this problem more clearly in a drama review, watch this:
➡ https://kisskh.at/profile/oppa_/review/504896
It explains what I’m trying to say—this dynamic is not minor fluff, it’s about how responsibility, consent, and accountability are being portrayed.
Now, about the story itself.
After 4 episodes they’re not married, yes—but his first response to the pregnancy wasn’t “what do you want?” or “how can I support you?”
It was “I’ll marry you.”
Not a question. A declaration. That already frames control, not choice.
You keep saying it’s “her choice,” but choice isn’t just words.
Does she actually have freedom?
Can she choose another man if she wants?
Can she continue her career without his interference?
Can she live her private life without being monitored or questioned by him?
What’s shown so far says no.
He inserts himself into her life, disrupts her work, questions her relationships, and claims emotional authority over her body and future—when they aren’t even friends, let alone partners.
And the biggest issue you’re overlooking: he didn’t use protection without telling her.
That isn’t a minor flaw. That’s a serious ethical violation.
Then the drama reframes him as “supportive” because he helps her through the suffering he directly caused. Supporting someone through consequences you created doesn’t erase the harm.
It’s like this:
If I cut off your legs and then offer to carry you for the rest of your life, does that make me a good person?
Especially when you never wanted me—a stranger—in your life at all?
No.
You don’t get moral credit for “support” that creates lifelong dependency and strips someone of autonomy.
The FL is forced into a cruel moral dilemma:
carry the pregnancy and sacrifice her future
or abort and carry lifelong emotional guilt
Then the ML says “it’s your choice” while standing there with expectations, pressure, and implied judgment. That’s not freedom—that’s emotional coercion disguised as kindness.
This isn’t about the ML being imperfect.
It’s about the narrative normalizing deeply problematic behavior and asking viewers to accept it as romance because he later acts gentle.
People are free to enjoy the drama.
But criticism of its themes, power dynamics, and ethics belongs in a review, not buried in a comments section just because it’s uncomfortable.
If the story is based on real-life scenarios, it will be judged by real-life standards. You can’t defend harmful behavior as romance and then hide behind fiction when people call it out.
Normalizing toxic relationships, excusing abuse, or framing lack of consent as destiny isn’t harmless entertainment. Stories shape mindsets.
Enjoy drama, but wake up from the fantasy that every toxic relationship is “true love.” Drama doesn’t erase basic morality.
And yes, I completely agree that having babies in itself is not wrong at all. South Korea genuinely does need to increase its birth rate if it wants to sustain its society and diaspora in the long run. That concern is valid.
What feels deeply wrong, though, is how some of these dramas choose to portray it. Impregnating a stranger because “things just happened,” not using protection — when condoms are hardly expensive even for a poor CEO or a powerful president — and then framing the pregnancy as fate or romance is irresponsible storytelling.
Pressuring a woman to carry the pregnancy out of obligation, fear, or social pressure is even worse. And showing her abandoning her life, dreams, and career as if that’s the natural or noble outcome feels like a very outdated, almost medieval mindset — reducing women to child-making machines rather than full human beings with agency.
So yes, romance audiences may enjoy it without questioning the logic, but that doesn’t mean the messaging isn’t problematic. Wanting more babies is understandable; promoting it through coercion, negligence, and glorified power imbalance is not.
She was two timing him(her husband) when she was dating her bf (ml)
They got in accident he becomes handicapped trying to save her,
She lost her memory
And her father married her to him, and she married him to take responsibility for his situation
Then when she meet her ex, and regained her memory she started cheating and then abandon her husband,
They were husband and wife for years and she had no empathy or sympathy for her husband
And no regard for father son relationship her son and husband had built
Just because she found biological father of her son...
She and her strong rich boyfriend bullied an handicapped man
And his wife and son were stolen....