It's interesting that you found the behaviors you're foaming at the mouth against, to be "cute." Perhaps…
You're right that I find nothing admirable about Gyeon. Loyalty is the least you can expect from a friend. And I'd like to know what exactly DoHa needed protection from: a harmless hug? A walk on the beach? Or maybe it was from someone who could take care of him and eventually win him over? ...Anyway, I don't care anymore. Let's finally leave these characters to rest in peace. I'm not interested in them enough.😝
It's interesting that you found the behaviors you're foaming at the mouth against, to be "cute." Perhaps…
In my opinion, the characters and story in this drama aren't complex enough to justify an in-depth analysis. If they made the ML end up with the friend it must be because they find him the most deserving . I know, before you say it, that in life the person who deserves it most doesn't always win and that we don't always make the right decisions, but I don't think this is the kind of thoughtful drama that requires such elaborate analysis —if that was the creators' intention, they failed miserably. Rather, it's a romantic drama with rather flat characters and a p̶r̶e̶d̶i̶c̶t̶i̶b̶l̶e̶ supposed happy ending.
I hate toxic boyfriends — or even worse, toxic friends who want to be more — who try to defend me from anyone who simply wants to talk to me, for no good reason. They steal my right to decide for myself who I want to talk to, acting as if they own me and as if their way of loving me were the only proper way. Fortunately, there are other and better ways to show love besides being a fanatical and possesive prick. This behaviour shouldn't be overlooked, rewarded or portrayed as cute because it's not.
Komagine Kiita has had the same facial expression throughout the two seasons of the drama. If the camera did not focus on him, no one would know that he was feeling something.
Now jealous and resentful murderers deserve honourable funerals and thanks for their sacrifice, which, btw, would have been unnecessary if they weren't jealous and resentful murderers.🙄
What has to do with your intelligence is not their preferences, but the fact that you are unable to understand an easy-to-understand story just because you don't know those preferences -and honestly, your rude and nonsensical responses don´t help.
It's almost comical—if it weren't so sad—to see some people's obsession with figuring out “who does what” in a gay couple. As if other people's intimacy were a public spectacle, or as if a relationship could be explained with a couple of labels to reassure the minds of those who can't stand what they don't understand.
This obsession says more about the curious person than it does about the couple: it reveals morbid curiosity, prejudice, and a spectacular inability to accept that the world does not revolve according to their heteronormative molds. Because, of course, in heterosexual couples, no one insists on asking who fulfills which role... there, privacy is sacred.
So the answer is simple: it's none of your business. Relationships are not measured by positions or other people's fantasies, but by respect and affection. Anyone who needs to know more should look less at other people's beds and more at their own insecurities.
What a stupid thing to say! So, you can't understand or enjoy a story if you don't know their preferences in bed? That say a lot about your intelligence.
When 2 drunk people carried away with the situation and kissed , its a big blunder.But today the TL wasnt drunk.…
Come on! You're being too uptight. If explicit consent were required for every little action or decision, it would be better if nobody did anything at all. Anyway, a hug when both are sober is not the same as a kiss when one of them is almost unconscious — not that I think it's such a big deal either, but the friend is too possessive without any right to be so.
When does Siwat stepmother die? That bitch is irking my nerves something fierce.
I wonder why she wanted the others to find them if she had no plan in regard whatsoever. But she said it while wearing her perfect jungle outfit and ordering another coffee, despite being in the middle of the forest. What style!😂
...Anyway, I don't care anymore. Let's finally leave these characters to rest in peace. I'm not interested in them enough.😝
I know, before you say it, that in life the person who deserves it most doesn't always win and that we don't always make the right decisions, but I don't think this is the kind of thoughtful drama that requires such elaborate analysis —if that was the creators' intention, they failed miserably. Rather, it's a romantic drama with rather flat characters and a p̶r̶e̶d̶i̶c̶t̶i̶b̶l̶e̶ supposed happy ending.
This obsession says more about the curious person than it does about the couple: it reveals morbid curiosity, prejudice, and a spectacular inability to accept that the world does not revolve according to their heteronormative molds. Because, of course, in heterosexual couples, no one insists on asking who fulfills which role... there, privacy is sacred.
So the answer is simple: it's none of your business. Relationships are not measured by positions or other people's fantasies, but by respect and affection. Anyone who needs to know more should look less at other people's beds and more at their own insecurities.
Anyway, a hug when both are sober is not the same as a kiss when one of them is almost unconscious — not that I think it's such a big deal either, but the friend is too possessive without any right to be so.