Dude, google "rapey", that's exactly what it means, regardless of wether it's slang or not, rapey is by defintion someone who is sexually agressive and behaves inappropriatly. Why are you so hung up on that term? If Yi Chen hadn't pushed him off he would've probably continues, so he is, in fact, rapey. And I was stating my opinion, from the start I have been stating my opinion, you're the done who keeps responding to my comments. Also "no one cares", but apparently you do, because if you didn't you wouldn't have commented under my comments.
I don't watch bls because I want to see random guys sexually harass or assault other guys, if murder is part of the plot I can get that (also go back to ep 1 and see how hard they censored his death, f off with that comparison), forcefully making out with someone is so unecessary and me critisizing that shouldn't wake such a strong response in you. Genuinly can't believe how low the bar is for screen writing these days, that you're on here defending and justifying a rapey character
I don't understand why my opinion upsets you so much. He is a rapey person because he sexually assaulted him, which is literally what the defintion of "rapey" means. What part of my comment was factually incorrect?
I've watched all the other history series, and this one was the shittiest one out there (so obviously they can do a better job). I've seen a lot of great bls who don't need a sexually aggressive lead to deliver a fantastic plot. Normalising plot lines where certain men behave like animals, and have the other lead fall for them regardless of their past behaviour, and then portray all of that as "romantic" is disgusting to me. It's also a valid concern within the bl community, why does one lead have to force themselves onto the other for there to ever be any romantic relationship? There was literally nothing else he could've done to win Yi Chen back? Cause if that's the case then the screenwriters could've done a better job making him seem obsessive without having him fly off the handle like that. Sexual assault in bls is overdone, and I don't think there's a problem in me critizising a fictional characters behaviour I'm not a fan of
That's what rapey means. The fact that he sexually assaulted him and was willing to go further makes him a rapey person lol. And I feel like they could've expressed that obsessive part of the plot without having to cross unnecessary and gross boundaries
I don't watch bls because I want to see random guys sexually harass or assault other guys, if murder is part of the plot I can get that (also go back to ep 1 and see how hard they censored his death, f off with that comparison), forcefully making out with someone is so unecessary and me critisizing that shouldn't wake such a strong response in you. Genuinly can't believe how low the bar is for screen writing these days, that you're on here defending and justifying a rapey character
I've watched all the other history series, and this one was the shittiest one out there (so obviously they can do a better job). I've seen a lot of great bls who don't need a sexually aggressive lead to deliver a fantastic plot. Normalising plot lines where certain men behave like animals, and have the other lead fall for them regardless of their past behaviour, and then portray all of that as "romantic" is disgusting to me. It's also a valid concern within the bl community, why does one lead have to force themselves onto the other for there to ever be any romantic relationship? There was literally nothing else he could've done to win Yi Chen back? Cause if that's the case then the screenwriters could've done a better job making him seem obsessive without having him fly off the handle like that. Sexual assault in bls is overdone, and I don't think there's a problem in me critizising a fictional characters behaviour I'm not a fan of
2. Color rush
3. Where your eyes linger
4. You make me dance
5. Mr Heart
6. Wish you
never watched long time no see