"For several years now, I've promised my fans that I'd hold a birthday party, and this year, I finally have the time, so I'm determined to make it happen. It's also a dream I've had since I was very young. A lot of you might not know this, but I first started learning vocal music when I was six or seven years old. Back then, I even dreamed of becoming a singer. That's why music is incredibly, incredibly important to me. In my private time, I actually spend a lot of hours honing my craft- whether it's hiring teachers or practicing at home. I've been practicing many songs for a long time, hoping that one day I could sing them all on a bigger stage for you all.
About half of the concert will be OSTs. After all, many of you came to know me through the characters I've played, and I know you remember them deeply. I think when I sing these songs, it will remind you of the times you were binge-watching the dramas, and these characters will come back to your minds. It's my way of thanking you for falling in love with me through these roles. The other part is a bit of a personal indulgence. After all, I debuted as a singer, and I've always had so many aspirations for that profession. I have so many senior artists and teachers whom I admire and love, and I adore many of the songs and albums they've released. I want to share them with you through my concert. For example, songs like Teacher David Tao's "Ordinary Friend" and Teacher Wang Leehom's "Love Mistake." Of course, of course, I've only mentioned two categories so far. Actually, there's a third one, a special section just for the fans. I'm sure you can probably guess what it is. Songs like "Rainy Days" and "Exclusive Angel" are tailor-made for you.
Over the past few years, no matter what I've been through, you've all been by my side, never leaving. Every moment I've spent with you is vivid in my memory because whenever I needed you, you were always there. So this time, I want to tell you that I am always here for you too.
Dancing is a bit different from singing. It requires spending a huge amount of time in the practice room, in front of a mirror, slowly letting your muscles build memory, reinforcing them, and finding that former state of being. It's about giving it my all, just to present you with a complete stage. I think the biggest challenge in dancing for me is performing girl group dances. I don't know why, but you all really want to see me do them, so I'll just do it to make you happy.
Whenever I feel tired or encounter setbacks in my work, you all always step up to give me motivation.
I think the greatest gift I can give my fans this time is to show you my best self on stage with all my heart, not just with words.
When we all sing together, I think that's a dream for every singer. The moment I hand the microphone to you, it's just an incredibly, incredibly beautiful feeling. That moment feels different; I think it's the happiness of being a singer. I'm truly so happy.
Little Khaana, don't get involved in the fight on that page. x83 is using you against CC. She's also trying to…
Thanks for this, the misunderstanding is resolved. It's kind of you to do this because if I am to comment this myself to her it will look like I am desperately saving my ass 😂.
You pretend I am invisible and ignore my comments, while targeting me with a long post, when I have never interacted…
Oh wow unblocking me right now. Pick a struggle. Why would I defend and join you blindly praising or commenting about the screenwriter, director or producer? The reading comprehension thrown out of the window with the last sentence as you don't seem to get that I don't have a problem with AM.
@/Xiang83 decided to block me so to those wondering why I will not be able to reply, this is the reason.
She decided to post her attacks with the "protection" of spoiler tag but now that her post was defended against, she seem not to allow it.
Please refrain from writing fictional stories about HMH and I will be calling you out again. And of course, she will again police everyone here who questions the FL's age with this romantic role.....
Edit: I admit that how I constructed some of my words before are confrontational in response to the subtly shading of her posts due to her countless justification about the underage casting and she don't allow anyone to question the underage FL acting in a romance drama. I am overstimulated when I posted it but now I am calm and used an appropriate approach to discussion.
Credits to @/Thadheilly for her reply to you as it sums up your responses to everyone who disagrees with you here:
"Your recent responses have provided a very instructive example of the communication patterns you regularly display, which I’ve seen repeated across the threads and various interactions.
You clearly invest time and energy into crafting your comments, but it’s precisely this pattern, the long-winded, overly intellectualized replies filled with tangents and inflated language, that highlights a deeper behavioral tendency: an avoidance of direct engagement. Your style functions less as dialogue and more as a monologue designed to obscure, deflect, and provoke.
These patterns are problematic for constructive discussion With your passive-aggressive communication rather than addressing criticism or disagreement head-on, you tend to reply through vague superiority, indirect barbs, and excessive verbiage. This creates the illusion of civility while still managing to belittle or antagonize others. The result? No real resolution, only performative clarity.
In your narcissistic presentation of ideas there is a noticeable tendency to elevate your perspective as if it were inherently more informed, more reasonable, or simply above critique. When challenged, the typical response is not openness but thinly veiled contempt — or worse, subtle manipulation that frames dissent as ignorance or bad faith.
You use deflection and gaslighting time and again, when you shift the conversation away from the issue at hand, inserting unrelated references, over-contextualized narratives, or academic-style justifications, not to support a point, but to avoid having to answer for the initial concern. This not only derails discussion but attempts to make others feel as though they misunderstood or misrepresented what was “clearly explained.”
You have verbosity and communication overload (logorrhea). You often overload your responses with unnecessary detail, obscure references, or language that serves no clear communicative purpose beyond exhausting your interlocutor. Whether intentional or compulsive, this is not discourse, it's domination by word count.
And lastly provocation followed by victimization. This is the most persistent and telling pattern. When responses begin to reflect frustration, quite justifiably, given the above, you pivot to victimhood. Suddenly, you are the one being attacked, misunderstood, or "bullied by groupthink." It’s a convenient switch: provoke, derail, then moralize about being targeted. This creates an emotionally manipulative loop that shields you from accountability and reframes the conversation around your hurt feelings rather than your own behavior.
These behaviors do not foster dialogue; they dismantle it under the guise of intellectual engagement. And they do not go unnoticed, not by your critics, and certainly not by the neutral observers you may believe you are winning over with performative reasoning.
Your comments speak for themselves, just as mine will. I hope at some point you’ll be willing to examine the actual impact of your approach, not just its intent or presentation.
Wishing you clarity, and a more constructive outlet for your energy."
Edit: I edited this to make a calm stance and provide a more calm approach. I apologize to you @/Xiang83 if I hurt you from my previous and now I corrected it but my stance still stands.
1 
3 
3 
1 
1 
1 
"For several years now, I've promised my fans that I'd hold a birthday party, and this year, I finally have the time, so I'm determined to make it happen. It's also a dream I've had since I was very young. A lot of you might not know this, but I first started learning vocal music when I was six or seven years old. Back then, I even dreamed of becoming a singer. That's why music is incredibly, incredibly important to me. In my private time, I actually spend a lot of hours honing my craft- whether it's hiring teachers or practicing at home. I've been practicing many songs for a long time, hoping that one day I could sing them all on a bigger stage for you all.
About half of the concert will be OSTs. After all, many of you came to know me through the
characters I've played, and I know you remember them deeply. I think when I sing these songs, it will remind you of the times you were binge-watching the dramas, and these characters
will come back to your minds. It's my way of thanking you for falling in love with me through
these roles. The other part is a bit of a personal indulgence. After all, I debuted as a singer, and
I've always had so many aspirations for that profession. I have so many senior artists and
teachers whom I admire and love, and I adore many of the songs and albums they've released. I want to share them with you through my concert. For example, songs like Teacher David Tao's "Ordinary Friend" and Teacher Wang Leehom's "Love Mistake." Of course, of course, I've only mentioned two categories so far. Actually, there's a third one, a special section just for the fans. I'm sure you can probably guess what it is. Songs like "Rainy Days" and "Exclusive Angel" are tailor-made for you.
Over the past few years, no matter what I've been through, you've all been by my side, never
leaving. Every moment I've spent with you is vivid in my memory because whenever I needed you, you were always there. So this time, I want to tell you that I am always here for you too.
Dancing is a bit different from singing. It requires spending a huge amount of time in the practice room, in front of a mirror, slowly letting your muscles build memory, reinforcing them, and
finding that former state of being. It's about giving it my all, just to present you with a
complete stage. I think the biggest challenge in dancing for me is performing girl group dances. I don't know why, but you all really want to see me do them, so I'll just do it to make you happy.
Whenever I feel tired or encounter setbacks in my work, you all always step up to give me motivation.
I think the greatest gift I can give my fans this time is to show you my best self on stage with all
my heart, not just with words.
When we all sing together, I think that's a dream for every singer. The moment I hand the
microphone to you, it's just an incredibly, incredibly beautiful feeling. That moment feels
different; I think it's the happiness of being a singer. I'm truly so happy.
I am always here, for my exclusive angels."
9/8 - House of H&M
9/14 - Fred
She decided to post her attacks with the "protection" of spoiler tag but now that her post was defended against, she seem not to allow it.
Please refrain from writing fictional stories about HMH and I will be calling you out again. And of course, she will again police everyone here who questions the FL's age with this romantic role.....
Edit: I admit that how I constructed some of my words before are confrontational in response to the subtly shading of her posts due to her countless justification about the underage casting and she don't allow anyone to question the underage FL acting in a romance drama. I am overstimulated when I posted it but now I am calm and used an appropriate approach to discussion.
Credits to @/Thadheilly for her reply to you as it sums up your responses to everyone who disagrees with you here:
"Your recent responses have provided a very instructive example of the communication patterns you regularly display, which I’ve seen repeated across the threads and various interactions.
You clearly invest time and energy into crafting your comments, but it’s precisely this pattern, the long-winded, overly intellectualized replies filled with tangents and inflated language, that highlights a deeper behavioral tendency: an avoidance of direct engagement. Your style functions less as dialogue and more as a monologue designed to obscure, deflect, and provoke.
These patterns are problematic for constructive discussion
With your passive-aggressive communication rather than addressing criticism or disagreement head-on, you tend to reply through vague superiority, indirect barbs, and excessive verbiage. This creates the illusion of civility while still managing to belittle or antagonize others. The result? No real resolution, only performative clarity.
In your narcissistic presentation of ideas there is a noticeable tendency to elevate your perspective as if it were inherently more informed, more reasonable, or simply above critique. When challenged, the typical response is not openness but thinly veiled contempt — or worse, subtle manipulation that frames dissent as ignorance or bad faith.
You use deflection and gaslighting time and again, when you shift the conversation away from the issue at hand, inserting unrelated references, over-contextualized narratives, or academic-style justifications, not to support a point, but to avoid having to answer for the initial concern. This not only derails discussion but attempts to make others feel as though they misunderstood or misrepresented what was “clearly explained.”
You have verbosity and communication overload (logorrhea).
You often overload your responses with unnecessary detail, obscure references, or language that serves no clear communicative purpose beyond exhausting your interlocutor. Whether intentional or compulsive, this is not discourse, it's domination by word count.
And lastly provocation followed by victimization.
This is the most persistent and telling pattern. When responses begin to reflect frustration, quite justifiably, given the above, you pivot to victimhood. Suddenly, you are the one being attacked, misunderstood, or "bullied by groupthink." It’s a convenient switch: provoke, derail, then moralize about being targeted. This creates an emotionally manipulative loop that shields you from accountability and reframes the conversation around your hurt feelings rather than your own behavior.
These behaviors do not foster dialogue; they dismantle it under the guise of intellectual engagement. And they do not go unnoticed, not by your critics, and certainly not by the neutral observers you may believe you are winning over with performative reasoning.
Your comments speak for themselves, just as mine will. I hope at some point you’ll be willing to examine the actual impact of your approach, not just its intent or presentation.
Wishing you clarity, and a more constructive outlet for your energy."
Edit: I edited this to make a calm stance and provide a more calm approach. I apologize to you @/Xiang83 if I hurt you from my previous and now I corrected it but my stance still stands.