
Chun Mo Rionnag:
Yet another reason to avoid the comments under dramas. Instead, read the reviews on MDL
Ditto this. I never read MDL comments, and even the MDL reviews are of mixed usefulness because of: (1) reviews from the first episode or two before dropping (why aren't these purged after the series finishes release?), and (2) reviews that focus too much on what's wrong and all the "warnings" and "triggers" (which rarely trigger me, or are sometimes things I even like) rather than what's good about the BL. I'm usually most interested in whether it's enjoyable, whether the protagonists are engaging, and whether it's a nice love story.

American Fan:
I see this series got a rating slightly lower than Middleman's Love. Hehe. Sounds like both were bombs, going by popular opinion.
("this series" = "Playboyy") I actually enjoyed both, even though both were very flawed, and I myself gave them below-average ratings. But that's not what I want to say ...
In the case of "Middleman's Love", the first two episodes were indeed awful, but it got much better, especially Episodes 7 (for Gus/Tong fans) and 8 (for Tutor/Yim fans) of the uncut version (!). Unless somebody watched the uncut version to the end, their MDL rating doesn't mean much to me - and I suspected that this applies to a minority of the MDL ratings. So point #1: MDL ratings may be skewed by people that rate the first episode or two, then drop the series.
I've also seen MDL ratings (e.g. for "Hit Bite Love") which I suspect have a lot to do with moral disapproval (very young actors in a steamy BL with taboo themes). Not that "Hit Bite Love" isn't very flawed, but I think that this is an added factor in its terrible average MDL rating. This could, to some extent, also be the case with "Playboyy". So point #2: MDL ratings may be skewed by factors like moral disapproval or "triggers" that usually aren't relevant to me. (PS: Not sayin' I don't have morals, but they're my own, not someone else's.)