
liddi:
I think they were lured to the separate thread covering poems in chapter titles that H19279 created.
Either way, as someone in their thread mentioned, interpretations are subjective. As such, it is regrettable to see efforts to mock an interpretation that does not agree with their own, particularly if one is able to provide sufficient compelling evidence to support it. Not to mention that these analyses and interpretations were neither done on the main thread, nor encroaching into their individual threads. In an ideal world, we would be having mature, intelligent discussions or indulging in silliness without feeling the need to attack each other, even if we have differing opinions.
Yes. We do probably over-analyse here. But I think that's just part of the fun. Engagement with any work of art is inherently subjective, IMO. We all have our biases, some of us are more conservative in our interpretation while others take things further. As long as we're not pushing our view on others, where's the harm? I don't harbour any ill feelings towards people who like Jing or YaoJing; it's just different strokes for different folks. I just wish there weren't personal attacks being thrown our way as a collective. These shipping wars are silly.
I was at the peak of my annoyance with LYF and XY last week. But, I've actually found a way to interpret this book that, surprisingly, has nothing to do with romance. This approach makes a lot of sense to me and puts to rest some of the issues that I was having with this story.