Proposal for modification of reviews rating system

Once more, all of your other reviews are positive, implying there are hardly any downvotes. 

 pash:

tell me if there are (and in that case, how many) people who downvoted, say, 3 or more of my reviews

Yes, it's those three reviews, but the downvotes occurred over a period of months.

 Aoi:

Once more, all of your other reviews are positive, implying there are hardly any downvotes. 

Once again, I apologize but it seems like I can't get my point through....>____<
Please allow me to better explain by going more into details:
I just checked my reviews listed by their "usefulness", so that I'll know that if a review with N+1 upvotes is listed AFTER one with N upvotes, it means the former got downvoted at least once. Using this method I calculated that roughly one third of my reviews (93 out of 285) got at least one downvote. There could be more, and a handful of them have received more than just one downvote, but with this method that's all I can infer so let's limit ourselves to those figures.
Now, am I losing my marbles over a hundred or so downvotes when just my top8 most upvoted reviews make up for that (and then some)? Of course not.
BUT.
What I'm suspecting is that those 93+ downvotes did not come from 93+ users, but rather that a relevant part of them might come from a handful of people who each downvoted, who knows, 5, or 10, or 20 of my reviews.
In my humble opinion, if that were the case, it would mean that those people would clearly being targeting me. 'Cause if you know that you don't like what I write (perhaps because we have different opinions, ideas, tastes etc.) why should you keep reading my reviews (or pretending to)?!?

And this is point #1. More personal and therefore less important, on a general scale.

Then comes point #2, which is what made me decide to open this topic:
Regardless of whether I'm being targeted or not, the real issue (and that's a general one, regarding us all) is that the system, as is, is RIFE FOR ABUSE.
People COULD use the system to target other users.
Why should we keep a system like that?
Once again, we can LIKE posts but not DISLIKE them.
It's simple, efficient and makes for a healthy, friendly and positive environment.
Why can't we adopt the same system for reviews?
Why the need for downvotes, and even more importantly, why the anonimity?
All that can be easily exploited.
Haters gonna hate anyway, you might say.
Fine, but why should we keep making things easier for them?

As they say in court: I rest my case, Your Honor.

 With the increasing number of fanbots / people who open multiple accounts with different IDs just to vote their favourite drama with 10s, or to gang up against other members who have an opinion they don't agree with - I seriously think Pash's proposal is a great idea. Nobody is against people disagreeing with a review or opinion, but its when people purposely attack another that the problem begins. 

Easy to say we shouldn't focus on the negative and continue reviewing / posting comments, but when it happens time and time again, it can be so discouraging. And the fact is like Pash pointed out, I am seeing an increasing number of users with an agenda to downvote reviews of people they do not like. I can't remember the exact accounts but I have seen this happening in some other user's reviews as well, especially Korean and Chinese dramas, where people cannot take another person disliking a drama of their favourite actor / actress.

I personally feel this function makes it really easy to target the user, rather than truly answer the question of what made the review unhelpful? To be honest, if you don't like the review, leave a comment or don't like it. I don't understand the 'dislike' function AT ALL.

 SallyIsHere:

But just because you don't agree with the review, does it really make it unhelpful?

In some cases, yes.

There is one user who I know will write a scathing review of certain types of drama. They seem to watch every damn one of them, and proceed give a horrible review. You can go through their history and see that every series of a certain genre greatly annoys them, and they are very vocal about it.  Not sure why they torture themselves like that, but that is off topic.  In any case, their reviews aren't really helpful to others (or myself) in my opinion. 

I have also seen rambling diatribes that literally retells the whole series in a review. Nobody wants to read a blow-by-blow recap of the whole series in a review. Unnecessary for them to write that review, and I downvote.

I also think there are some who write reviews that are bad or hateful against certain actors/actresses (or the series they appear in).  I might give a bad review of an actor on occasion, but this goes way beyond that. Again, once you see a pattern of a certain person doing so, it is quite obvious what they are doing.  They are unhelpful, and get a downvote from me. 

There are other situations that also get my downvote, but these are some examples of why I would vote to keep downvotes.