DramawatcherHD

can there really be a dress that can have print on it that cant be seen only when the lights go out?

she was also threatend with her mother to do it. and she also pored poison in her own cup.

the sister dies on first day of queen so i dont think anything happened. He was mistaking her for FL since they are twins and he didnt know she had a twin and used her sisters name when she went out.

it didnt make sense, other than the superstition they had no other reason. the king planned to keep her father locked up until he solved the case on finding the shooter and whos behind it so that he can free him. but the other ministers got involved pressuring him to execute FL father, after the failed prison break. he still had a chance to save him until his mother had the maid come with that confession about the enlightenment book.

thats because ML has made the connection of the detective and Chef loser. if you dont do that then you cant see everything clearly. FL hasnt interacted with the detective and has no reason to doubt him right now. she hasnt made the connection yet. so to her hes atleast being a normal detective breaking the rules to tell her delicate information. although she should still see something wrong with him not warning her about Heo prior to releasing him and all of sudden hes so dangerous.

its not the villian shes trusting blindly. did everyone forget she went to the police and talked to the detective working her moms case? hes at fault for lying about everything. its hard for her to refute what he says because she has no access to background stuff to verify what he tells her.

cant totally blame her she believed the detective more so than she was believing the chef. To her hes not familiar with her and normally wouldnt have a reason to lie to her. now if she was able to connect the detective working with the chef then i doubt she would have believed either of them the way shes doing.

i mean where in the world can she check if he really has 14 priors without access to criminal database?

i dont believe she was believing just the chef here, she still had doubts because what shes saw with her own eyes. she went to confirm things with the detective is what did it. The detective is completely wrong for lying and deceiving her as a civil servant. especially when its about her mothers case. hes betraying the trust the people should have for the PD to do their Job. so i think the biggest one at fault is the detective because he has mountains of evidence and is helping cover up a major crime.

Ending was trash, the story had a nice start got weird with how things turned out.

They are totally ridiculous treating DY like that. The issue is what his mom did. And he doesnt even know half of what shes done.

how she brings everything on herself by blaming soo ji for everything when all she has to do is mind her own business. she makes everything about Soo Ji. She makes the most outlandish accusations with no proof. HS is still in love with Soo ji? how they both are in new relationships and Soo ji is also getting married. her getting divorced is her own fault has nothing to do with soo ji.

well he was forced to take a different name from a kidnapper so her anger is understandable. she cant punish her for the crime because shes already deceased. Uri has realized hes been kidnapped i dont think he should be so resistant to the change given the circumstances how he came to get his name.

it also has the year 2029 on there so i dont know if its a timeskip or not

the leads kissed atleast 2 times what i saw. the drunk kiss and the one he did to see if she remembers.

i think its clearly implied it happens off screen. she mentions being sexually frustrated several times.

?? this sarcasm right?

There are a few things that dont make sense in the movie. did the boyfriend die? he was hit by a van in flashback looks like.

i dont think he didnt do anything for 11yrs. he might have secretly helped alot in the time he was away. i agree shes reacting a bit much to what he did. she basically the one wanted him to leave. and hIs only flaw so far was failing at business. No gambling, no drinking, no abusiveness or cheating. so overall her reaction is assuming the situation from listening to some arguments and because dad doesnt defend himself she assumes everything is his fault. I never understand loan sharks logic to destroy a shop that just recently opened because theyre too impatient for a store to generate enough profit. There snack bar was actually somewhat popular when it opened looks like so its not like they were never gonna be able to pay back the loan. These loan sharks are so ridiculous when they expect the money back in 24 hours with 2000% interest. (im exaggerating the time and interest but thats how it almost feels when they come collect alot of times) The dont even look at the account books majority of the time to see what theyre really earning so lets just smash up the shop and force them to close so they cant pay back the money that were hounding them to pay back. smh

I dont get peoples thoughts on calling him a dead beat. arent we watching the same thing? he was pretty much force out to leave back then. His only chacter flaw so far is being bad at starting businesses. if he was a drunk or a gambler id agree but he had none of those bad habits as it appears so far. I think everyone is judging him too quickly.