KileHarvs

"I've been observing your comments. After the Summer Night series trailer was released, someone mentioned Phuwin and Dunk's similarities, and you immediately said, 'The one whose acting will be bad is Dunk.' Without even watching the series, you'd already nitpicked his performance. What a way to judge someone! Couldn't you find another way to differentiate between them without assuming Dunk's acting is subpar? Directors aren't stupid; they cast actors for reasons like talent, chemistry, popularity, unique look, and versatility. And let's be real, Dunk does possess some of these qualities. His charm, popularity, and chemistry with co-stars are undeniable. He may lack acting skills, but he's still improving. Other actors may excel in different areas, and that's okay. Let's appreciate each actor's unique value. Comparing sports to acting doesn't fit, as acting requires continuous experience and role diversity. Dunk's lead roles provide valuable experience, helping him grow. Let him learn.

Moreover, it's not only about reasons; the industry has its own way of choosing main leads. Factors like market demand, audience appeal, and production needs play a significant role. Dunk's selection as a lead actor likely considered these aspects. Instead of criticizing, let's focus on his growth and the value he brings to his roles."

"I disagree that they're comparable. Careers unfold differently. Some actors blossom early, while others need time to refine their craft. Dunk's progress might not match others', but that doesn't diminish his potential.

Yes, I'm a fan, but that doesn't mean I'm blind to flaws. However, some viewers, like you, tend to overcriticize these actors. Constructive feedback is valuable, but constant nitpicking can be discouraging

🙄showed up where

"Oh, so being 'pretty' doesn't help? I think it's more than that! Let's not lie, being 'pretty' definitely helps capture audience attention - it's a fact! Dunk's charisma and charm on screen are a big part of his appeal. And let's not forget, he's also shown his range as an actor in his previous roles. Physical appearance might get people's attention at first, but it's his talent and dedication that keep us invested in his characters. So, yeah, being 'pretty' might not be everything, but it's definitely a bonus when combined with his acting skills! And yeah, about his acting - you may not like it, but I'm glad to say he's never failed me. In my opinion, acting is a long learning process, and he will learn and grow day by day. I'm excited to see his progress and how he'll continue to improve with each new project! And I'm glad you are hoping to see him improve, though that shows you still have faith in his potential!"

"Come on, let's be realistic! Dunk has only done two shows so far, and while he's already shown a lot of promise, he's still in the early stages of his career. He's still learning, growing, and developing his craft. Yeah, I watched Hidden Agenda and I enjoyed it - I knew going in that he's new to this career and still learning, but I thought he did great! Considering his limited experience, I think he brought a lot of energy and charisma to the role. And let's not compare him to other actors just yet - everyone develops at their own pace, and Dunk is on his own path. Puwins is a great actor, but Dunk has his own unique style and talent. I also want to apologize, I think I misinterpreted your previous comment - I understand now that you were just expressing your preference for Puwins, not criticizing Dunk's acting. Let's give Dunk time to make mistakes, learn from them, and improve with each new project. He's not a seasoned actor yet, but he's got potential and I'm excited to see how he'

Now I know what they say acting is subjective not everyone can like the same thing we different taste coz what you just commented right now others are not saying the same thing instead he is appreciated something I always wanted to hear so I won't blame you that's opinion not the truth