AKIRA

It was amazing. I watched ep 1 and 2 and it felt complete to me. The Music, the quality of production. Everything was pretty well introduced. The relationships and dynamics is already laid out. Of course episode 2 was needed to completely tell the introduction, otherwise the episode 1 falls apart.
The groundwork was laid out pretty well. Most scenes were relevant to the plot. All the scenes were relevant for characterization and plot. The dialogue felt refreshing, because there were no flowery, cliche, out of pocket lines. It felt grounded and somewhat realistic. The dialogue didn't feel cartoonishly dramatic or over the top.

I would like to add that episode 1 needs 2 with it to feel complete and vice versa. I can see why others would feel underwhelmed, but I will let this one cook first then deliver my complete thoughts on it. I feel like this drama is gonna be a really good one. I just like the tone and vibe of it. WATCH 1 and 2 together. This drama feels slow burn and chill, so it is not for everyone.

Felt the complete opposite, just my opinion.

It was amazing. I watched ep 1 and 2 and it felt complete to me. The Music, the quality of production. Everything was pretty well introduced. The relationships and dynamics is already laid out. Of course episode 2 was needed to completely tell the introduction, otherwise the episode 1 falls apart.
The groundwork was laid out pretty well. Most scenes were relevant to the plot. Idk, what you meant by unnecessary, but all the scenes were relevant for characterization and plot. The dialogue felt refreshing, because there were no flowery, cliche, out of pocket lines. It felt grounded and somewhat realistic. The dialogue didn't feel cartoonishly dramatic or over the top. I would like to add that episode 1 needs 2 with it to feel complete and vice versa. I can see why others would feel underwhelmed, but I will let this one cook first then deliver my complete thoughts on it. I feel like this drama is gonna be a really good one. I just like the tone and vibe of it. WATCH 1 and 2 together

but I said I agreed with you. It's just that you missed my point entirely ...smh.... ok I guess lol.

I think you misunderstood me, I don't want censorship, Im just sharing my opinion about a topic, where did you even get that idea?

Creativity is self expression, because it is formed from a person's own hands, and ideas ,hence creativity is a form of self expression. Saying creativity is not self expression is like saying ice didn't come from water. Art doesn't come from anywhere else other than the one who made it. Even by definition, even if you google it art is self expression.

I agree with you that not every flaw should be fixed but flaws should not exist so that you can glamorize a wrong and horrible action. It needs to have a narrative purpose. it should not be exist because an author wants the story to be "realistic". let me repeat it, not every flaw should be fixed, I agree with you on that. My point is that a story should not romanticize a horrible action nor mask it as a quirk of a character.

Art is not an expression of flaws, art is a form of self expression. Flaws are part of art and sometimes those flaws adds to art , but there’s a point where flaws hinder art, it’s the same reason why modern art sucks, if you consider every bit of flaw as art then you can just splash random colours at a cnavas and call it art. You can try to call it art but it sure is a horrible display of art

Flaws don’t necessarily need to be fixed or lead to a life lesson, but flaws shouldn’t be glamorized. For example, if a character cheats, there needs to be a purpose, justification or reason of why the person cheated, in short it needs to be addressed, if the cheating is just part of a character because the story mask such action as normal, realistic and actively tries to justify it then that’s just horrible character writing.


There a line between flaws that make a good character and flaws that make a horrible character. if there was no such rule then your basically just randomly splashing paint on a canvas and calling it 'art'

It is not that people don't like flawed characters. It's just that sometimes the execution of it is terrible, in some cases a story romanticizes flaws instead of addressing issues about it, those flaws becomes a quirk of a character and not an actual flaw. It trivializes certain issues and mask horrible actions as normal or acceptable. Flaws are essential for a development of a character and or make a good villain/ anti hero, but flaws shouldn't be romanticized in any way. You can make a great character that has a lot of flaws. But you need to acknowledge those flaws instead of masking it as something else. Flaws and horrible actions doesn't mean realism, reality can be cruel and sublime all at the same time. Most people mistake cruelty for reality

This drama is what I categorize as fun bad. The drama isn't trying to be good, it just does what it wants; MC interactions are weird to say the least, but It just rides that wave and is consistently that way. It is fun to watch and just outright funny, and doesn't take itself seriously. The plot is just goofy and unserious. If the plot could ride a vehicle, it would fly a boat. Sail a train and drive on rails. lol if your up to just having fun, this drama is my recommendation . Just don't take the plot seriously and laugh at it.