Exactly... It's the people in the comments projecting for me.
You are so dense. You dont do your argument any favours by calling others retard and then also being offended when others are being mean about somebodys body.
Haven't logged in MDL in a while. I had to do because bitches in the comment got diagnosis going on over someone…
so now maybe you can stop being a "stupid cunt" (your words) and mind you own business and let people discuss this article and the celebrity.
People are entitled to have opinions, comment, and discuss on what is observable. Its free speech as long as its not deformation.
Celebrities get a lot of money and part of their job is being in the public eye. If they were not being discussed they would not be getting hired for work.
The response is everything i would expect - churlish, vapid, and cowardly. I have nothing more to say to you. How about you follow your instructions and do the same.
In most countries, a company is a legal registered entity, and the data is available and open to public scrutiny. If he is a director a lot of that information would registered (public govt websites) and be available to the public as well. Obviously Korean law is probably a lot different.
You cant have your cake and eat it. I agree actors deserve privacy in their personal life. But it gets complicated because they are a public figure and sell their image to fans and other businesses to use and to sell products. So certainly I think they do have a duty to uphold their image and if there is a potential issue, a duty exists to disclose this to the brands represented and affected because of the contractual relationships entered. Even if there is no legal judgment yet, certain actions will affect perception of the brand.
If an actor did not sell their image to brands, I think they deserve more privacy than those that do.
I don't know what actors/celebrities owe their fans. Their personal lives are none of our business. But i would also be disappointed if they misled and lacked integrity on issues I considered important.
PS I am talking generally and not specifically about this actor
In the UK there is something called "the spirit of the law"You have these laws and they may not be as…
I understand and appreciate your objective which is that there should be NO consequences until there is an actual formal judgment. I dont disagree particularly in this situation.
Unfortunately, it seems that the Korean public has passed judgement based on the the NTS and on the facts circulating about how the company was used. They find those tax evasion/avoidance attempts distasteful.
The law isnt always about justice and fairness, but about evidance and technicalitis and a good legal team. Now out of curiosity, I wonder how the Korean public would view him if his legal team can achieve a positive outcome when they have knowledge of the facts presented and asusming they are correct (shell company, money distributed to avoid tax, run from eel restaurant, did not have staff etc).
You are a coward, an impotant little coward. You have only projected and thrown baseless insults at me - and then scrubbed them away because you are not man enough to stand by what you said. You are as much of a loser as your president - dumb and he also thinks he has won.
I have only ever judged you by your words and your actions and i have not missed.
PS its always smart to have recipiets and i was kindof amused by your "what you though was clever" diatribe - which you were so ashamed apparently.
In the UK there is something called "the spirit of the law"You have these laws and they may not be as…
In my comment above, I explained a principle - and how its abuse could trigger an investigation. Nowhere did I mention anything relating to this actors actions or his accounting or that it's even applicable to hm.
You have gone out of your way to defend KSH when I have not accused him or insinuated any wrong doing. I am curious as why you are so vested, and seem to spend a lot of time addressing these posts and how you are so knowledgeable about Korean tax law
We discussed CEW a while back, and its I stumbled on this video from a Korean legal professional which you may find interesting (or at least he says he is on youtube). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbF-ADvZ6eg
Again I dont wish to see either of them cancelled - just to pay the fines if guilty and move on. It the Koreans who are seeing this as a major crime.
lol im capable of fighting my own battles. I see that that you are a coward and you deleted your posts. Is that you admitting defeat? PS I have a screen shot of your cute little insults.
How is using the tax code to your benefit to save money "legally" on taxes such a scandalous thing? It…
In the UK there is something called "the spirit of the law" You have these laws and they may not be as prescriptive but they are made with certain intentions. If you overstep, you are seen to be taking the piss and breaking the principle of law.
So say that you can have a company and use it to claim expenses in managing your career. But if that company is used more as a means to avoid tax then they have a reason to query. They have auditing and statistical formulas that flag anomalies in the accounting and they would want to investigate further.
The unusual expenses and massive reduction in taxable income would trigger an investigation.
All the other actors in news about tax evasion were those who were given notice by tax department but Seonho isn't…
ignore etoks21 who is a impotent little troll. Poor guy, he lacks the intelligence and maturity to respond to arguments and points raised in comments. So he does what the next best thing and that is to hurl insults at your character. I think he is your typical Trump supporter.
ignore etoks21 who is a impotent little troll that can only hurl insults as he does not have the intelligence to respond to an argument or valid question. He resorts to throwing insults aimlessly due to his capped mental capacity instead of reason and logic. I think he is your typical Trump supporter.
"now it turns out it might not be totally legal after all."Based on WHAT, Knetz?
etoks21 is a impotent little troll that can only hurl insults. He does not have the intelligence to respond to an argument so he will retort by insulting your character.
" Knetz is a derogatory term used primarily by international K-pop fans to refer to Korean netizens, particularly those who are active online and known for sending malicious, often sexually charged or misogynistic comments toward celebrities."
People are entitled to have opinions, comment, and discuss on what is observable. Its free speech as long as its not deformation.
Celebrities get a lot of money and part of their job is being in the public eye. If they were not being discussed they would not be getting hired for work.
I have nothing more to say to you. How about you follow your instructions and do the same.
You cant have your cake and eat it.
I agree actors deserve privacy in their personal life. But it gets complicated because they are a public figure and sell their image to fans and other businesses to use and to sell products. So certainly I think they do have a duty to uphold their image and if there is a potential issue, a duty exists to disclose this to the brands represented and affected because of the contractual relationships entered. Even if there is no legal judgment yet, certain actions will affect perception of the brand.
If an actor did not sell their image to brands, I think they deserve more privacy than those that do.
I don't know what actors/celebrities owe their fans. Their personal lives are none of our business. But i would also be disappointed if they misled and lacked integrity on issues I considered important.
PS I am talking generally and not specifically about this actor
Unfortunately, it seems that the Korean public has passed judgement based on the the NTS and on the facts circulating about how the company was used. They find those tax evasion/avoidance attempts distasteful.
The law isnt always about justice and fairness, but about evidance and technicalitis and a good legal team. Now out of curiosity, I wonder how the Korean public would view him if his legal team can achieve a positive outcome when they have knowledge of the facts presented and asusming they are correct (shell company, money distributed to avoid tax, run from eel restaurant, did not have staff etc).
You have only projected and thrown baseless insults at me - and then scrubbed them away because you are not man enough to stand by what you said. You are as much of a loser as your president - dumb and he also thinks he has won.
I have only ever judged you by your words and your actions and i have not missed.
PS its always smart to have recipiets and i was kindof amused by your "what you though was clever" diatribe - which you were so ashamed apparently.
You have gone out of your way to defend KSH when I have not accused him or insinuated any wrong doing. I am curious as why you are so vested, and seem to spend a lot of time addressing these posts and how you are so knowledgeable about Korean tax law
We discussed CEW a while back, and its I stumbled on this video from a Korean legal professional which you may find interesting (or at least he says he is on youtube).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbF-ADvZ6eg
Again I dont wish to see either of them cancelled - just to pay the fines if guilty and move on. It the Koreans who are seeing this as a major crime.
A video by a korean legal person explains the situation in english.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbF-ADvZ6eg
I see that that you are a coward and you deleted your posts.
Is that you admitting defeat?
PS I have a screen shot of your cute little insults.
xxx
Ass ka -( lol - is that your clever insult?)
You have these laws and they may not be as prescriptive but they are made with certain intentions. If you overstep, you are seen to be taking the piss and breaking the principle of law.
So say that you can have a company and use it to claim expenses in managing your career. But if that company is used more as a means to avoid tax then they have a reason to query.
They have auditing and statistical formulas that flag anomalies in the accounting and they would want to investigate further.
The unusual expenses and massive reduction in taxable income would trigger an investigation.
I think he is your typical Trump supporter.
" Knetz is a derogatory term used primarily by international K-pop fans to refer to Korean netizens, particularly those who are active online and known for sending malicious, often sexually charged or misogynistic comments toward celebrities."
Your every accusation sounds like your confession.
You should go and read the vitriol by Koreans. They are angry and they feel personally hurt.
"You're not intelligent".
and so what ? Your comment is as stupid as me calling you fat and ugly.
... if you are so intelligent then why cant you address the points made in the argument instead of the person. Are you uneducated?