A love contract with more plot twists than a soap opera and less paperwork than expected!
"Love in Contract : 7.8/10 – A Quirky Rom-Com That Almost Sticks the Landing"
THE GOOD:
Park Min-young’s charm – She could sell a "marriage of convenience" plot in her sleep (and basically does).
The fake marriage chaos – A classic trope, but with enough twists to keep it fun.
Go Kyung-pyo’s awkward CEO – Dorky, rich, and weirdly endearing.
THE "MEH" MOMENTS:
The love triangle – Felt like a last-minute "wait, we need more drama!" addition.
Pacing issues – Some episodes sprint, others nap.
That one villain – Less threatening, more "annoying neighbor who won’t return your Tupperware."
THE "WHY DIDN’T THIS HIT HARDER?" FACTOR:
Chemistry? Cute, but not "rewatch their scenes 10x" level.
Ending – Rushed like a K-drama character late for work.
VERDICT:
"Like a B-tier rom-com you’d binge on a lazy Sunday—enjoyable, but forgettable by Monday." Watch for: Park Min-young’s wardrobe (flawless) and the light, easy vibes. Skip if: You demand depth or logical plot progression.
THE GOOD:
Park Min-young’s charm – She could sell a "marriage of convenience" plot in her sleep (and basically does).
The fake marriage chaos – A classic trope, but with enough twists to keep it fun.
Go Kyung-pyo’s awkward CEO – Dorky, rich, and weirdly endearing.
THE "MEH" MOMENTS:
The love triangle – Felt like a last-minute "wait, we need more drama!" addition.
Pacing issues – Some episodes sprint, others nap.
That one villain – Less threatening, more "annoying neighbor who won’t return your Tupperware."
THE "WHY DIDN’T THIS HIT HARDER?" FACTOR:
Chemistry? Cute, but not "rewatch their scenes 10x" level.
Ending – Rushed like a K-drama character late for work.
VERDICT:
"Like a B-tier rom-com you’d binge on a lazy Sunday—enjoyable, but forgettable by Monday." Watch for: Park Min-young’s wardrobe (flawless) and the light, easy vibes. Skip if: You demand depth or logical plot progression.
Was this review helpful to you?
