Quantcast

Details

  • Last Online: Jun 26, 2025
  • Gender: Female
  • Location:
  • Contribution Points: 0 LV0
  • Roles:
  • Join Date: May 27, 2025
Replying to hamendofoctober May 28, 2025
Person Lee Jin Wook
"You're discussing affirmative consent? Unfortunately, affirmative consent doesn't necessarily require verbal…
why, i cant post coments with this link?
Replying to nyamnyambom May 28, 2025
FACT: Evidence Explicit of Active Consent (Non-Verbal)Flirtatious conversation about clothing (Miss A laughed,…
Due to evidence of manipulated bruises, Miss A’s lawyer did not use the bruise claim, previously reported via Dispatch, as a defense in the appeal trial. They only focused on Miss A’s motive, stating she sought no money and had no prior similar cases. However, the manipulated (self-inflicted) bruises, overlooked by the initial court, were a key reason prosecutors appealed. This, along with Miss A’s inconsistent statements—initially claiming extreme violence, then admitting no coercion—led the appellate court to overturn the initial ruling and convict Miss A of false accusations.
Replying to nyamnyambom May 27, 2025
FACT: Evidence Explicit of Active Consent (Non-Verbal)Flirtatious conversation about clothing (Miss A laughed,…
NOT VIOLENCE ENAUGHT ????

in the bombaya between A and Lee Jin-wook. Forensics showed A's claimed injuries were self-inflicted, and the relationship was proven consensual. Plus, A admitted on July 26, 2016, that there was no coercion, contradicting her initial claim of extreme violence. So, the r@p33 accusation didn't hold up, and A's report was proven false. That's why NOT VIOLENCE ENAUGHT!!!!!

That is why the initial verdict was overturned. Furthermore, it was discovered that Ms. A manipulated evidence (self-inflicted bruises supported by forensic analysis (prompting the prosecutor to file an appeal
Replying to nyamnyambom May 27, 2025
FACT: Evidence Explicit of Active Consent (Non-Verbal)Flirtatious conversation about clothing (Miss A laughed,…
FACT: Explicit Verbal Consent

Miss A admitted saying e7aculate inside, "Today is safe" (not fertile). Police verified her cycle matches LJW's claim, proving active consent, contradicting her claim of staying silent out of fear.

And this serves as evidence that consent was never withdrawn during bombayah.
Replying to nyamnyambom May 27, 2025
To delulu haters attacking Jin-wook with "He literally said in court that there was no consent": Are you talking…
FACT: Evidence Explicit of Active Consent (Non-Verbal)

Flirtatious conversation about clothing (Miss A laughed, said "at home, I don't wear clothes") and reciprocal actions (hugging, kissing, physical contact). This meets the standard of active non-verbal consent under affirmative consent guidelines.
On Beyond the Bar May 27, 2025
To delulu haters attacking Jin-wook with "He literally said in court that there was no consent": Are you talking about affirmative consent? affirmative consent doesn't necessarily require verbal consent but can also be non-verbal (active actions), and Lee Jin Wook has both.