Strong Potential Undermined by Weak Writing and Inconsistent Characters
I really wanted to like Love and Crown, mainly because I see genuine potential in Allen Ren. He was excellent in One and Only, and his performance in The Blue Whisper was solid as well. Unfortunately, this project doesn’t live up to that promise. The shortcomings don’t lie in a single area—the writing, production choices, character construction, and even the chemistry all feel underdeveloped.
The male lead is framed as a ruler forged by prolonged patience—someone who willingly surrendered regency and endured years of restraint in order to consolidate strength. Instead, his character remains surprisingly passive. Rather than embodying the weight and transformation of a king, his primary motivation revolves almost exclusively around protecting the empress. This makes him feel more like a reactive figure than a decisive one—more talk than action—undermining what could have been a far more compelling arc.
The empress, meanwhile, is written as an idealistic heroine guided by a simple moral framework: protect the weak, punish the evil. While this concept works in theory, the execution falls flat. When faced with real consequences, her responses rarely align with the strong moral stance she claims to uphold. Emotional reactions often replace meaningful action, and forgiveness is handed out too easily, even when it contradicts her stated values. This creates a noticeable disconnect between who the character is meant to be and how she actually behaves.
Performance also plays a role here. The actress struggles to convey emotional depth through facial expressions, which weakens pivotal moments and makes it difficult to fully believe in her character’s internal conflict or convictions.
Two recurring narrative patterns stand out throughout the series. First is the overused trope of “hurting someone for their own good,” repeatedly employed without enough nuance to justify its emotional weight. Second is the persistent tendency to shift blame onto the king for nearly every misfortune, as if other characters lack agency or responsibility for their own choices. This imbalance becomes increasingly frustrating and reduces the complexity of the story’s moral landscape.
Ultimately, I decided to stop at episode 23. By that point, the script felt repetitive, the plot logic strained, and the emotional chemistry still absent. Love and Crown had the ingredients for a strong political and emotional drama, but weak writing and inconsistent character development prevent it from reaching its potential.
The male lead is framed as a ruler forged by prolonged patience—someone who willingly surrendered regency and endured years of restraint in order to consolidate strength. Instead, his character remains surprisingly passive. Rather than embodying the weight and transformation of a king, his primary motivation revolves almost exclusively around protecting the empress. This makes him feel more like a reactive figure than a decisive one—more talk than action—undermining what could have been a far more compelling arc.
The empress, meanwhile, is written as an idealistic heroine guided by a simple moral framework: protect the weak, punish the evil. While this concept works in theory, the execution falls flat. When faced with real consequences, her responses rarely align with the strong moral stance she claims to uphold. Emotional reactions often replace meaningful action, and forgiveness is handed out too easily, even when it contradicts her stated values. This creates a noticeable disconnect between who the character is meant to be and how she actually behaves.
Performance also plays a role here. The actress struggles to convey emotional depth through facial expressions, which weakens pivotal moments and makes it difficult to fully believe in her character’s internal conflict or convictions.
Two recurring narrative patterns stand out throughout the series. First is the overused trope of “hurting someone for their own good,” repeatedly employed without enough nuance to justify its emotional weight. Second is the persistent tendency to shift blame onto the king for nearly every misfortune, as if other characters lack agency or responsibility for their own choices. This imbalance becomes increasingly frustrating and reduces the complexity of the story’s moral landscape.
Ultimately, I decided to stop at episode 23. By that point, the script felt repetitive, the plot logic strained, and the emotional chemistry still absent. Love and Crown had the ingredients for a strong political and emotional drama, but weak writing and inconsistent character development prevent it from reaching its potential.
Was this review helpful to you?
