ShizukaHatsumi

you say you didn't personally insult or attack anyone at first, but your own comment history proves otherwise.You asked to be shown where you attacked first. In your very first comment, before a single person replied to you, you call strangers a bunch of daughter of pr0$titut€s feminist barking. You also described female characters and the people who watch them as spreading legs somewhere outside her marriage. You didn't react to being attacked you initiated the hostility. Claiming now that you only reply the same harsh words is factually incorrect. set the tone every one else just reacted to you dismissed the entire show immediately because it was written by a feminist women. This is a logical fallacy where you judge the quality or truth of something based solely on its origin rather than its actual content. You decided the drama was bad not based on the writing, but based on your personal bias against the author's gender and beliefs.You told me to go and use ur victim card somewhere else, but you are the one playing the victim by claiming you are being attacked personally for just stating facts.In reality, people are tackling your statement by pointing out that your statements are based on sexist generalizations and threats of physical violence .

Marcelo, you are hiding behind the word logic while consistently failing to use it.
​When people call you out for your behavior, you retreat into the claim that I never said to every women, it’s only for those women or I never said the hate every women. This is a textbook fallacy. You are moving the goalposts by creating a specific, shifting definition of who you are attacking so that you can never be proven wrong. It’s a way to insult people while pretending you’re only targeting a specific group.
​Instead of refuting arguments, you resort to calling people double standard mind women or telling them don’t just bark like a dog. By labeling anyone who disagrees with you as barking or twisted, you are attacking the person rather than the point. Using slurs like cuckold , simp to dehumanize others is a sign that you don't have a logical defense for your original statements.
​You claim people are twisting words or that they are complaining about truth, but you are actually misrepresenting their criticism. People aren't upset because of truth they are pointing out that your tone and your harsh treatment are logically inconsistent with the facts you claim to represent. You are arguing against a version of the criticism that is easier for you to mock.
Edit: You are using extreme, tragic stories about friends who almost took their life to justify why you would smack her if anybody cheated on your close friend. While cheating is painful, using the trauma of others to justify physical violence is a logical leap. You are using emotional manipulation to distract from the fact that you are advocating for assault, which is not a rational or legal response to emotional betrayal.You claim that cheating is almost equal to killing him. While emotional betrayal is severe, equating it to homicide to justify a violent reaction (I would smack her) is a massive logical failure. You are equating emotional harm with physical crime to justify a physical punishment.

At this point you are just contracting your own replies
You’re throwing the word feminist around like a smoke screen to hide the fact that your argument is just a collection of violent fantasies. It’s funny how you tell others not to get triggered yet you are writing a whole manifesto about belt treatments and physical assault because a fictional writer didn't follow your personal script. If you’re this obsessed with what feminist women are doing, maybe it’s time to step away from Kdramas

Using a drama forum to vent this much personal anger and talk about belt treatment says a lot about you. Justifying mud***ing women says alot about your character