Oops she blocked me too hahhaha what did I even do????
It's really sad. She is calling opinions lies. I'm not sure how old she is, but this constant shaming of people who do not like what she likes is ridiculous.
In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with using a historical figure, as long as it's clear from the get-go that…
I appreciate your response. Iāll give you an example using other infamous historical figures. To be clear, the actors are doing a great job. This is solely a critique of the story itself.
Here goes: A Cambodian woman travels back to 1970. On her way to the city, she meets a handsome, brooding man named Pol Pot Oppa. Heās tall, has chiseled jaws, twenty-pack abs, and sharp fox-like eyes. He kidnaps her and declares she will be his slave. The woman knows full well the atrocities Pol Pot Oppa will soon commit, but itās fine because heās just misunderstood. Deep down, the real reason he became a mass murderer is because his mother once touched poison ivy or something. Anyway, Pol Pot Oppa and the Cambodian woman fall in love, get married, and live happily ever after in the future.
Obviously, Iām exaggerating to make a point. I completely respect your opinion and your right to enjoy the show. I also appreciate hearing different perspectives. I just wanted to clarify my stance. I personally do not believe that labeling something as fictional automatically makes the concept morally acceptable. Iām happy to elaborate further if needed.
Oops she blocked me too hahhaha what did I even do????
I saw that you commented but I can't seem to find your response. My goal was not to make this a battle field, please dont use my comment as a means to talk negatively about them. Have a lovely day as well ( āāā)
I really need you to stop lying š¤ and you can dislike a drama or hate it but atleast be HONESTEdit to this…
excuse the length of my response, I am a writer and like my words being thorough to leave little room for misinterpretation. This will be my final response and the conversation does not seem to be going anywhere.
You are free to take my comment in whatever way suits you. It seems my words have been misinterpreted because of a defensive approach. If you wish to continue contributing to spaces filled with frustration, that is also your choice.
As I have been reading through the comments, I have noticed ten responses so far that come across as mean. Often they provoke the original poster to respond in frustration or anger, which only continues the cycle. This creates an environment where discussion feels hostile instead of enjoyable. Saying the blood did not look realistic is an opinion, not a fact, and opinions can exist without being an attack.
It is possible to express dislike or point out something that seems off without turning it into a personal confrontation. Calling out perceived āliesā or insisting others must agree creates tension where it does not need to exist. People will have different reactions to the same scene, the same effects, or the same storyline, and that is natural. Disagreement does not have to become a battle.
I truly enjoyed reading your positive review of the show, and I value seeing other perspectives as long as they are shared respectfully. Honest critique can coexist with admiration for the same work. Spaces like this feel lighter and safer when discussion does not become about who is right or wrong, but about sharing what moves us, irritates us, or excites us.
Why see my comment as an attack? Why demean my character? Why not have a calm conversation? People should be able to share opinions without feeling anxious that their intelligence or intentions will be questioned. Respectful conversation allows people to coexist in the same space without anxiety or tension. That is all I hope for here.
I shall go play with my outdoor critters now. Have a lovely day
I really need you to stop lying š¤ and you can dislike a drama or hate it but atleast be HONESTEdit to this…
I am simply a stranger wanting to enjoy seeing diverse opinions. It feels sad to witness people spoken to harshly for not sharing the same thoughts. If someone is being hateful, I understand the need to respond, but in many of your comments, that was not the case. There is no need to burn your energy in frustration. Sharing your love for the show can be enough.
I do not think I am better for feeling differently about the show. I noticed your expressions of joy and love for it, and it truly brought me a moment of happiness to read them. Spaces like this feel safer and lighter when people focus on sharing what brings them joy instead of chasing disagreement.
I really need you to stop lying š¤ and you can dislike a drama or hate it but atleast be HONESTEdit to this…
It seems there has been some misunderstanding. I never said you replied to every comment. What I noticed was how quickly conversations here become heavy, how people begin to defend themselves instead of simply sharing their thoughts. You mentioned being sick, yet you continue to involve yourself in arguments that only seem to drain more energy. It feels unnecessary, even unkind to yourself.
People should be able to share their opinions, whether they love something or not, without fearing that their character or intelligence will be torn apart. When disagreement turns into accusation, the whole space changes. It stops being a place for exchange and becomes something smaller, a corner filled with noise and defensiveness.
No one gains from that. If we could all pause before reacting, maybe there would be more understanding, more space to breathe between words. This is not about restricting anyone, but about remembering that discussion can exist without hostility.
Iām not enjoying this show so far. Knowing that itās based on the real Yeonsangun of Joseon makes it deeply uncomfortable to watch. I keep wondering why they chose to romanticize him. He wasnāt a tragic king or a misunderstood ruler. He was a tyrant who executed scholars for criticizing him, banned free speech, and destroyed entire families out of paranoia. He turned the palace into a place of violence, forcing women from all over the country into his service for his own pleasure. He humiliated ministers, burned books, and ruled through fear. It feels as strange as trying to portray Christopher Columbus as a hero. I also donāt sense much chemistry between the male leads. Maybe itās because the story is tied to someone who actually existed and caused so much pain. So far, his character feels cruel and empty, without even a flicker of humanity. I still plan to finish the show, but mostly because I like to see things through, even when they leave me uneasy.
I really need you to stop lying š¤ and you can dislike a drama or hate it but atleast be HONESTEdit to this…
I donāt usually comment, but this feels strange. Why do you keep chasing after people who simply see things differently? Itās as if you canāt stand the thought of someone existing outside your version of whatās right. Iāve seen you under so many comments, pulling apart their words, their character, their intelligence. Some people will love the show, and others wonāt. Thatās the nature of things, people drift toward what speaks to them. Wouldnāt it be softer, maybe even kinder, to share your thoughts with those who feel the same? You have every right to your joy, just as others have the right to their disappointment. Watching all this unfold, it only seems like a kind of exhaustion, disguised as conviction. Please, rest.
United States Of America... please for the love of God, Buddha, Odin, Allah, Osa... leave this alone. We do not need another spin off, just focus on Squirrel games or something
I didn't expect anything else but it actually bothered me that Hikaru mostly stopped crossdressing when they started…
I mean, he still dressed in a very feminine way. Remember the conversation he had with his friend? He explained that dressing feminine was a way to protect himself from the pain and expectations society placed on him. As his relationship with Haruka developed, he began to feel more comfortable in his own skin, which meant finding a balance between his feminine and masculine sides.
In the end, he still wore makeup, dressed in soft, gender-fluid styles, and took pride in his identity. If you had put a wig on him during that scene where he was applying makeup while preparing for their anniversary, he would have looked almost identical to how he appeared when crossdressing earlier in the series.
I understand what youāre saying, but I think itās a bit of a stretch to view the show as reinforcing conservative ideals. To me, Hikaruās journey wasnāt about rejecting his femininity to fit into a traditional relationship. It was about learning that he didnāt have to hide behind a specific image anymore. He could be both gentle and strong, vulnerable and confident, without feeling the need to choose one over the other.
Hikaru is a complex character who struggled with merging different parts of himself. By the end, we see him finally at peace with his identity, expressing himself freely in a way that feels whole and authentic. Thatās what made his character arc so meaningful to me.
I continue to be baffled by KSH defenders. Just because people are rightfully criticizing your pedopps does not mean we are haters. She was 15āa child! So much information has come to light. Sae-ron took her life on his birthday. Messages have been released showing he maintained contact with her when she was underage. Photos fom years ago has resurfaced. He has been caught in multiple lies. She pleaded for more time to repay a significant debt, but thereās no indication he responded. This is just so cruel. How can you people continue to tarnish her image when so much has come out? This is why itās important to promote self-love and mental well-being among young people. A significant age gap in relationships can create concerning power dynamics. This is why the age of consent exists. Children should never be in romantic relationships with adults. My heart truly breaks for Sae-ron.
Here goes:
A Cambodian woman travels back to 1970. On her way to the city, she meets a handsome, brooding man named Pol Pot Oppa. Heās tall, has chiseled jaws, twenty-pack abs, and sharp fox-like eyes. He kidnaps her and declares she will be his slave. The woman knows full well the atrocities Pol Pot Oppa will soon commit, but itās fine because heās just misunderstood. Deep down, the real reason he became a mass murderer is because his mother once touched poison ivy or something. Anyway, Pol Pot Oppa and the Cambodian woman fall in love, get married, and live happily ever after in the future.
Obviously, Iām exaggerating to make a point. I completely respect your opinion and your right to enjoy the show. I also appreciate hearing different perspectives. I just wanted to clarify my stance. I personally do not believe that labeling something as fictional automatically makes the concept morally acceptable. Iām happy to elaborate further if needed.
You are free to take my comment in whatever way suits you. It seems my words have been misinterpreted because of a defensive approach. If you wish to continue contributing to spaces filled with frustration, that is also your choice.
As I have been reading through the comments, I have noticed ten responses so far that come across as mean. Often they provoke the original poster to respond in frustration or anger, which only continues the cycle. This creates an environment where discussion feels hostile instead of enjoyable. Saying the blood did not look realistic is an opinion, not a fact, and opinions can exist without being an attack.
It is possible to express dislike or point out something that seems off without turning it into a personal confrontation. Calling out perceived āliesā or insisting others must agree creates tension where it does not need to exist. People will have different reactions to the same scene, the same effects, or the same storyline, and that is natural. Disagreement does not have to become a battle.
I truly enjoyed reading your positive review of the show, and I value seeing other perspectives as long as they are shared respectfully. Honest critique can coexist with admiration for the same work. Spaces like this feel lighter and safer when discussion does not become about who is right or wrong, but about sharing what moves us, irritates us, or excites us.
Why see my comment as an attack? Why demean my character? Why not have a calm conversation? People should be able to share opinions without feeling anxious that their intelligence or intentions will be questioned. Respectful conversation allows people to coexist in the same space without anxiety or tension. That is all I hope for here.
I shall go play with my outdoor critters now. Have a lovely day
I do not think I am better for feeling differently about the show. I noticed your expressions of joy and love for it, and it truly brought me a moment of happiness to read them. Spaces like this feel safer and lighter when people focus on sharing what brings them joy instead of chasing disagreement.
People should be able to share their opinions, whether they love something or not, without fearing that their character or intelligence will be torn apart. When disagreement turns into accusation, the whole space changes. It stops being a place for exchange and becomes something smaller, a corner filled with noise and defensiveness.
No one gains from that. If we could all pause before reacting, maybe there would be more understanding, more space to breathe between words. This is not about restricting anyone, but about remembering that discussion can exist without hostility.
In the end, he still wore makeup, dressed in soft, gender-fluid styles, and took pride in his identity. If you had put a wig on him during that scene where he was applying makeup while preparing for their anniversary, he would have looked almost identical to how he appeared when crossdressing earlier in the series.
I understand what youāre saying, but I think itās a bit of a stretch to view the show as reinforcing conservative ideals. To me, Hikaruās journey wasnāt about rejecting his femininity to fit into a traditional relationship. It was about learning that he didnāt have to hide behind a specific image anymore. He could be both gentle and strong, vulnerable and confident, without feeling the need to choose one over the other.
Hikaru is a complex character who struggled with merging different parts of himself. By the end, we see him finally at peace with his identity, expressing himself freely in a way that feels whole and authentic. Thatās what made his character arc so meaningful to me.