Cheating is bad,there can be no justification for it. But when it comes to drama like Hiraguo or love affairs in the afternoon or dramas like valid love,there seems a group of people who justify them saying (they are true masterpiece,they portray real world problems,husband doesnot understand the problems of wives,depression ,etc).Can be the same logic apply to this drama also? I know many people are going to bash me but its just my opinion.
Dear feminists supporting Song Ah in the comments, the issue here is not whether its okay to choose career or…
I agree, if song ah is a strong woman she should go to europe firstly when she was offered, at that time where are her dreams,career? At that that she acted cowardly and decided not to go for whom? Is because of her cheating boyfriend or HS( i think she has not yet loved HS at that time). It was a perfect condition to go but she refused but when she recieved the love from HS she remembers she had a dream which should be fulfilled at any cost, i just dont undestand the logic
she did get an early promotion due to taking up the job in europe and its shown at the end... just because she…
I didnt call her selfish because she chose carrier over love. In the ep 13 she saw the working of europe tf team ,it sparks the deceision to go to europe. And bm choi offered the same job she was doing in korea.And about promotion , HS was promoted,do you think she wont be promoted here.If going to europe was his dream I have no word to say, its only for travel pleasure.
From my point of view, song ah is the most selfish person,its not that i am against her going to abroad,but the reason for which she goes its absolute nonesense, she was quite in a good position and in a company that is topmost,in her own country,i feel that she wants to feel the 'kick' and plus its europe.I felt that if you choose to work in your own country with your boyfriend it does not take away your self esteem,plus those are saying she will regret in future i want to say its not that she was not promoted,its just just his regular job in another country ,its not that she was offered the queen of victoria which to be regretted.
I think the screenwriter was high on weed while writing the drama, it shows that all men are dogs and the sad part is people are liking the drama.who know in the future there will be a drama with all the wives cheating
I just dont understand the the adultery type of kdrama logics,when the woman cheats (whatever may be the reason) it is shown as if she gas achieved something,and it is shown on a positive way. But when the man cheats ,why the back ground condition of men is not shown and it shown in a negative way.if we talk about mental health it affects both men and women equally.Btw i am strongly against extramaritial affairs it should not be justified at any condition.
1 
But when it comes to drama like Hiraguo or love affairs in the afternoon or dramas like valid love,there seems a group of people who justify them saying (they are true masterpiece,they portray real world problems,husband doesnot understand the problems of wives,depression ,etc).Can be the same logic apply to this drama also? I know many people are going to bash me but its just my opinion.
At that that she acted cowardly and decided not to go for whom? Is because of her cheating boyfriend or HS( i think she has not yet loved HS at that time). It was a perfect condition to go but she refused but when she recieved the love from HS she remembers she had a dream which should be fulfilled at any cost, i just dont undestand the logic
and in a company that is topmost,in her own country,i feel that she wants to feel the 'kick' and plus its europe.I felt that if you choose to work in your own country with your boyfriend it does not take away your self esteem,plus those are saying she will regret in future i want to say its not that she was not promoted,its just just his regular job in another country ,its not that she was offered the queen of victoria which to be regretted.