Now that you mention it, I wonder if Moon Lovers would've gotten the backlash too since it's a remake of a Chinese…
You should read korean sites of how koreans react. It isn't regards to china like you saying though...
Completely opposite discription of the most significant kings in korean history. 1)King Sejong : made Korean written form, icon of independence → guard of priest(ep1), made Korean written form with the help of priests and korean-chinese(according to its released synopsis) 2)King Taejong : cared civilians → massacred civilians 3.)The characters don’t wear “got”. Got is a kind of a hat. It represents nobleness in that era. Going out without them is the same as going out in pajamas.
What was the writer even thinking while airing this drama?Shouldn't he realised the situation after receiving…
It didnt start with chinese food scene lol. This drama is a total distortion of history. They're wrong the wrong hats, they have the wrong architecture... if they're not going to reflect actual history, why not just turn it into a fictional world? Why use the names of actual figures and cause this confusion? Do not mess with King Sejong who is great king not a loser in this drama. This is what people are saying. Ur babies are getting postive views just cause they said arent involved nor know this dont worry
Completely opposite discription of the most significant kings in korean history.
1)King Sejong : made Korean written form, icon of independence → guard of priest(ep1), made Korean written form with the help of priests and korean-chinese(according to its released synopsis)
2)King Taejong : cared civilians → massacred civilians
3.)The characters don’t wear “got”. Got is a kind of a hat. It represents nobleness in that era. Going out without them is the same as going out in pajamas.