50kg

addendum:

Legality ≠ Morality

contracts often have morality clauses that enable companies to cut ties with a celebrity if their actions harm their brand. this isn't just about technical legality—it’s about public trust.

a scandal destroys trust and relationships, even if it doesn’t always end in a lawsuit. and what if it goes to court? would it be fair for a company to hold onto the celebrity until an outcome is reached? their brand would suffer during the duration of this time. if someone’s actions go against a brand’s values or public expectations, it’s fair for companies to just walk away.

no. they just want an apology. and he still won't look at you.

Just because a law wasn't as explicitly defined or strictly enforced before 2020 doesn't mean an action was "legal". It just means there was a loophole or lack of clear legislation.

Before 2020, the age of consent was ambiguous due to contradictions between different legal codes. It was only in 2020 that the age of consent was explicitly set 16, clarifying legal protections.

However, even before that, other laws, like those against child exploitation and statutory rape, could still be applied.

Saying something was "legal" just because the law wasn't as clear or strict before is misleading. It ignores the fact that society, law enforcement, and courts could still recognize grooming or exploitation as abuse under different legal codes and provisions.

edit: and no, the police would NOT be involved because they would just be turned away due to the immense power and fame Kim Soo Hyun holds. Do you honestly think the police are clean? The parents were actually turned away by over 100 media outlets who refused to expose him. Only through public pressure would they be able to have a case.

but even though these laws are in place, many do get away with them. most men were able to get away with it, let alone someone rich and powerful like kim soo hyun

lol you didn't even read her parents' statements and demands.
they didn't ask for money.
you know if i could slap someone like you irl i'd do it but i don't wanna dirty my hands with trash like you.

sae ron didn't die on this "imaginary husband"'s birthday. there were also no texts, no voice recordings, no videos, just some lame photoshoot claiming it's a "marriage".
there isn't even a marriage certificate.
sae ron died on kim soo hyun's birthday.
kim soo hyun fans are garbage.

thank you! i didn't have the time to cross-check info.

no such best friend would do this. the "best friend" is made-up, or bought off.

if it's tiktok, just ignore it. it's just the easiest platform to talk shit.

i find it hilarious that kim soo hyun rabid fanatics are creating all these email accounts just so they can sign up on MDL to defend him.

look, her parents didn't support her dating kim soo hyun.
didn't you read the texts she left behind?
she hid everything because she didn't want her parents to see him in a bad light.
she loved this man.
you're playing the victim card right now for yourself and that's more pathetic than the dead cockroach i've just splattered with my slipper 3 months ago.

|| why should i spend my energy

you're doing that now though? you created an account just to come here and defend him.

|| you all start bullying them

hey. don't flip this around and play the victim. the victim is kim sae ron. his fans were attacking a dead girl whom kim soo hyun made his girlfriend at the age of 15. they were attacking her parents, who are now trying to seek justice for their daughter.
they were calling her a whore just because someone made up shit about her having a husband and abortion, trying to pin all her grievances on other things when the glaring truth is that she killed herself on kim soo hyun's birthday. his fans are NOT victims.
kim sae ron is the victim. now you and all his fans can go shove your mouths on kim soo hyun's nipples and d*** go and see if he even wants you.

his cruelty is his own downfall.

knowing saeron is out of work and couldn't pay, and yet he forced her to cough up 700 million won. is he in dire need of this amount of money? he was paid so much per episode in every show he was in!
when she begged him to give her time and let her live, he sent her another legal letter telling her to not contact him. there was another article where an actor (i forgot who) was said to have offered to paid this amount, but soo hyun rejected it. what did that show? it proves that he just wanted saeron to die!

so ok, she went and died on his birthday because of his cruelty. and his response is to sue her parents who is trying to pursue justice for their daughter whom they lost to his predatory ass.

edit: and he's paying THREE damage control teams, PLUS support teams to write positive comments of him on social media to negate the negativity.

kim soo hyun fans who are so adamant on defending him, you have deep psychological issues. i can see from all your comments that you have extended your own identity onto him. he was your source of inspiration, and now all that is crumbling down, you struggle to accept reality. you deny his crimes even though these are all out in the open because you can't accept that you've been completely wrong about this person (even though you don't even know him in the first place). the characters he played on-screen may have had a significant impact on your lives, so you can't accept that you'd now have to scrub that all off as "wasted time". you need to address your own psychological issues. i mean it.

lmao..... the staff working in the background won't ever go bankrupt. they are paid on a fixed salary.
kim soo hyun fans are brainless.

kim soo hyun has many endorsement deals. in those contracts, typically companies have requirements such as:
- he must not have scandals that will affect the brand name and reputation of the company he's representing.
- if he breaks this rule, the company would cancel their contract, and penalties may apply.

the more endorsement deals he signs with companies, the more penalties he may have to pay. THAT would bankrupt him.

get it, idiot?

he went ahead and sued for that pic, outright admitting that he's the person in that pic. i think his lawyers have kimchi for brains

lol.. i can literally google india for rape news and the rape of an 8-month-old baby came out. 8 years old and 9 years old are the norm and you're still denying shits

he doesn't know who you are and he won't even look at you.

you are madder at the parents than the person who took advantage of a child whose parents were uninvolved in her life. got it.

his face wasn't even shown. filing a suit for that is just admitting he's walking around in a minor's house with his d*** out

then why the f*** did you reply?

because people think real life marriages are based on their desires in fiction.
i have no respect for ppl like that