This review may contain spoilers
Almost had a point until it lost it...
Trigger was a good critque of what may happen to a society if it had easy access to guns. It does not hide from where it cites it's sources (cough america cough) and makes it clear what the stance of the writer/directer is to unregulated guns.
However it seems that while the commentary is meaningful, it misses the mark at being profound. The story to seemingly display as to why people may turn to gun use -- whether it is mental illness that is further trigger by the circumstances an individual lives in, revenge of the system that fails to bring justice to victims whether that is in a workplace or school. However this is completely shut down near the end of the show, as it then places individual responsibility behind the issue with gun violence. Negating all these former things creates a harmful narrative that there is some intrinsic rage within us that fuels this violence rather than the circumstances we find ourselves in, grouping characters like the sex predator who killed out of annoyance and the victims of extreme bullying as the same when they are in fact not.
The mentioning of the "middle east" proves my point even more, not only did it not contribute anything to the story at hand (because the PTSD aspect of the officers motivations for abandoning guns was only mentioned ONCE and solely for drama not because it had anything valuable to add in terms of what PTSD actually is) it also contributed to this harmful narrative that "children and men just.. have guns". That is an extremely dangerous narrative perpetuated by non-SWANA, ESPECIALLY in the current state, is straight up propaganda. Again, it doesn't question the larger system -- how did those people get guns? Why were they using it? Why were Koreans even in those conflict zones to begin with? Had these questions been begged it would've given the viewer to see how the system ultimately is what leads to issues with violence.
The story had great potential and was so close to being great criticism of the systems that promote violence among common people until it didn't. It is a shame considering the great cast and OST.
However it seems that while the commentary is meaningful, it misses the mark at being profound. The story to seemingly display as to why people may turn to gun use -- whether it is mental illness that is further trigger by the circumstances an individual lives in, revenge of the system that fails to bring justice to victims whether that is in a workplace or school. However this is completely shut down near the end of the show, as it then places individual responsibility behind the issue with gun violence. Negating all these former things creates a harmful narrative that there is some intrinsic rage within us that fuels this violence rather than the circumstances we find ourselves in, grouping characters like the sex predator who killed out of annoyance and the victims of extreme bullying as the same when they are in fact not.
The mentioning of the "middle east" proves my point even more, not only did it not contribute anything to the story at hand (because the PTSD aspect of the officers motivations for abandoning guns was only mentioned ONCE and solely for drama not because it had anything valuable to add in terms of what PTSD actually is) it also contributed to this harmful narrative that "children and men just.. have guns". That is an extremely dangerous narrative perpetuated by non-SWANA, ESPECIALLY in the current state, is straight up propaganda. Again, it doesn't question the larger system -- how did those people get guns? Why were they using it? Why were Koreans even in those conflict zones to begin with? Had these questions been begged it would've given the viewer to see how the system ultimately is what leads to issues with violence.
The story had great potential and was so close to being great criticism of the systems that promote violence among common people until it didn't. It is a shame considering the great cast and OST.
Was this review helpful to you?
