having a female character in a show automatically makes it romantic? such a terribly heteronormative ass take…
I don't know what happened to your comments that they vanished into the void, but I've got to hand it to you. You've got the patience of a saint dealing with these homophobes
having a female character in a show automatically makes it romantic? such a terribly heteronormative ass take…
You're the ones screaming in caps and telling strangers that two fictional characters are "just friends" or "hetero." Who's "having a tearfest about something as simple as a stranger having differing views from your own?" Did you just discover the caps lock button?
"Hetero" this. "Hetero" that. Nothing you said, say or will say is "true." Fiction is make-believe. It's about having fun and exploring different possibilities in our heads. We see clues and hints that you're not picking up on
"They are just friends"
"Just friends" is a bland label. Where's the excitement in that? We can take two men on a wild ride and watch them realize "just friends" was the beginning of something beautiful, something magical, something that will make a "just friends" believer crack a smile and say, "they were onto something." Friends dating. Now, that's exciting
People who unironically ship them cannot understand the concept of a healthy and strong friendship between two…
Technically, fictional characters don't exist to have a sexuality. They aren't "hetero" or "homo" or ...
"It really seems like there's a desperation on some viewers part to make these two attractive, strong, alpha males homosexual"
Your (homophobic) comment implies that there's something implausible or undesirable about attractive, strong, alpha men being gay
The dismissive tone of the last sentence, "who am I to step on their dreams of shipping two perhaps hetero men? Moving on..." trivializes the legitimate desires of the audience to explore alternative storylines and relationships
We should be able to rewrite "straight" stories in ways that resonate with our experiences
At the end of the day, the canonical story is fictional. The canonical characters are fictional. Their "healthy, strong friendships" or "straight identities" are made-up. We will shake things up in our non-canonical gay alternative universe and turn "straight" identifying men into gay, man-humping lovebirds. Who are you to stop us?
wrestling is a sport of buff, sweaty men grappling each other in close proximity. sounds pretty gay to meunfortunately,…
"Friendships" are overrated. Who needs them when you can have the thrill of a gay/lesbian relationship?
Some people interpret a relationship or scene differently than you. They might see the "friendship" as a relationship or potential relationship. That doesn't mean they are "weird" or "wrong"
Respect diverse interpretations. Getting mad at someone's gay ships is weird asf
Hi, while I find your definition of the "omegaverse" to be very informative, I am well aware of the genre already…
The omegaverse trope is a lie. It divides women into two distinct groups: feminine-presenting and masculine-presenting
The "men" possessing women's ability to give birth are the masculine-presenting women. Calling them "men" demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding of human anatomy
I don't care that it's fiction. The ability to become "pregnant" is an inherent characteristic of women. A "man" who becomes "pregnant" is a man-looking woman
You use language that originates from the real world to describe fictional characters not representative of real men. It opens the door to objections
I can see that the word "man" is being used as a superficial label. And I can see that the mislabeling is ruining BL/yaoi. I will take it seriously
"The purpose of storytelling is to transport the audience to a world of hope and happiness." NO. The purpose of…
The way I see it, the purpose of storytelling is to lift our spirits, and not drag us down
I'm all for a little angst and drama. But finish them off with a hearty serving of happily ever after. If I wanted to be enlightened by sadness, I would look in the mirror, or step out my front door
Thank you, I intend to enjoy every last HEA BL I can get my hands on. I'm happy Love for Love's Sake was one of them
Who knows, maybe one day I'll write my own HEA BL masterpiece!
In Omegaverse fiction, males can get pregnant. The rules can be different depending on the writer or creator and…
The omegaverse trope is a lie. It divides women into two distinct groups: feminine-presenting and masculine-presenting
The "men" possessing women's ability to give birth are the masculine-presenting women. Calling them "men" demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding of human anatomy
I don't care that it's fiction. The ability to become "pregnant" is an inherent characteristic of women. A "man" who becomes "pregnant" is a man-looking woman
You use language that originates from the real world to describe fictional characters not representative of real men. It opens the door to objections
I can see that the word "man" is being used as a superficial label. And I can see that the mislabeling is ruining BL/yaoi. I will take it seriously
agreed. it will be dropping soon as more people watch the last episodes and rate it. the first four episodes,…
There's nothing wrong with taking inspiration from "straight" stories and adapting them for BL audiences. In fact, showing that the "straight" stories would have been exponentially better if they were told differently challenges homophobic social norms and broadens our understanding of relationships
The Little Mermaid? A dreamy merman should have stolen the prince's heart!
Beauty and the Beast? The story of a cursed prince finding love with a bookish male Beauty would have been a game-changer!
Harry Potter? Imagine the magic of Draco and Harry slow-dancing at the Ball, bathed in a shimmering rainbow of spells? It would have been wizarding perfection!
I could go on and on. BL can fix everything
A unique, unconventional BL premise still needs a satisfying, happy conclusion that ties up loose ends and provides closure for our male characters and the audience. A sad ending leaves me feeling unsatisfied
I disagree with the comments that claim "BL doesn't need a happy ending to be good"
BL is a romantic genre. A romantic story that culminates in a tragic conclusion is a disservice to the very essence of fiction. The purpose of storytelling is to transport the audience to a world of hope and happiness. The real world is rife with heartache and sadness already. I don't need to cry more!
I need an idealized world where love between two men conquers all and happy endings are the norm. Being happy. That's the transformative power of fiction. A sad ending betrays my trust and emotional investment in a BL story
That's gay
"Hetero" this. "Hetero" that. Nothing you said, say or will say is "true." Fiction is make-believe. It's about having fun and exploring different possibilities in our heads. We see clues and hints that you're not picking up on
"They are just friends"
"Just friends" is a bland label. Where's the excitement in that? We can take two men on a wild ride and watch them realize "just friends" was the beginning of something beautiful, something magical, something that will make a "just friends" believer crack a smile and say, "they were onto something." Friends dating. Now, that's exciting
"It really seems like there's a desperation on some viewers part to make these two attractive, strong, alpha males homosexual"
Your (homophobic) comment implies that there's something implausible or undesirable about attractive, strong, alpha men being gay
The dismissive tone of the last sentence, "who am I to step on their dreams of shipping two perhaps hetero men? Moving on..." trivializes the legitimate desires of the audience to explore alternative storylines and relationships
We should be able to rewrite "straight" stories in ways that resonate with our experiences
At the end of the day, the canonical story is fictional. The canonical characters are fictional. Their "healthy, strong friendships" or "straight identities" are made-up. We will shake things up in our non-canonical gay alternative universe and turn "straight" identifying men into gay, man-humping lovebirds. Who are you to stop us?
Some people interpret a relationship or scene differently than you. They might see the "friendship" as a relationship or potential relationship. That doesn't mean they are "weird" or "wrong"
Respect diverse interpretations. Getting mad at someone's gay ships is weird asf
The "men" possessing women's ability to give birth are the masculine-presenting women. Calling them "men" demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding of human anatomy
I don't care that it's fiction. The ability to become "pregnant" is an inherent characteristic of women. A "man" who becomes "pregnant" is a man-looking woman
You use language that originates from the real world to describe fictional characters not representative of real men. It opens the door to objections
I can see that the word "man" is being used as a superficial label. And I can see that the mislabeling is ruining BL/yaoi. I will take it seriously
I'm all for a little angst and drama. But finish them off with a hearty serving of happily ever after. If I wanted to be enlightened by sadness, I would look in the mirror, or step out my front door
Thank you, I intend to enjoy every last HEA BL I can get my hands on. I'm happy Love for Love's Sake was one of them
Who knows, maybe one day I'll write my own HEA BL masterpiece!
The "men" possessing women's ability to give birth are the masculine-presenting women. Calling them "men" demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding of human anatomy
I don't care that it's fiction. The ability to become "pregnant" is an inherent characteristic of women. A "man" who becomes "pregnant" is a man-looking woman
You use language that originates from the real world to describe fictional characters not representative of real men. It opens the door to objections
I can see that the word "man" is being used as a superficial label. And I can see that the mislabeling is ruining BL/yaoi. I will take it seriously
The Little Mermaid? A dreamy merman should have stolen the prince's heart!
Beauty and the Beast? The story of a cursed prince finding love with a bookish male Beauty would have been a game-changer!
Harry Potter? Imagine the magic of Draco and Harry slow-dancing at the Ball, bathed in a shimmering rainbow of spells? It would have been wizarding perfection!
I could go on and on. BL can fix everything
A unique, unconventional BL premise still needs a satisfying, happy conclusion that ties up loose ends and provides closure for our male characters and the audience. A sad ending leaves me feeling unsatisfied
BL is a romantic genre. A romantic story that culminates in a tragic conclusion is a disservice to the very essence of fiction. The purpose of storytelling is to transport the audience to a world of hope and happiness. The real world is rife with heartache and sadness already. I don't need to cry more!
I need an idealized world where love between two men conquers all and happy endings are the norm. Being happy. That's the transformative power of fiction. A sad ending betrays my trust and emotional investment in a BL story