DareDaniel

The blue house approved the drama and guess what, they are koreans 😉😉😉

Sure. First you watch the full show to understand the real picture and then you criticize it if you have to. That's how it works.😉

Nope. i want a breakdown of each scene from the first 2 episodes on why it distorts history. try again.

What would be the point of watching the show if they released the entire plot? You don't own the producers and you don't decide what they should do.

https://m.blog.naver.com/PostView.naver?blogId=nenier&logNo=222599850708&proxyReferer=

Now that you felt like a hero posting something you found on twitter and tumblr, read the fact check to get smarter.

https://youtu.be/nxR2wB5U0BM

"Be interesting to find out the story of the headmistress she had a flashback of being bound at the top of a water reservoir."
Yep one of the points of the show is to make you try to guess who characters are and what their convictions really are. the mystery is something that will make you keep watching the show and that's how scriptwriting works lol

Ah, I see you couldn't refute anything I said 😉😉😉😉
Now you also want to choose what type of roles actors should feel proud about. Is that your issue now? For fuck's sake lmao, you just want to get mad about anything, typical sjw behaviour. Actors get praised all the time for portraying evil characters if their performances are good. Two actors have been awarded with an oscar for portraying Joker. I don't even know what we are discussing about anymore.

Besides, people who choose the learn history through fictional movies is an entirely different issue. "let's cancel inglourious basters bc it distorts history, hitler didn't die in a cinema" - said no one ever, I guess?

MDL ratings are manipulated when you don't agree with them but legit when you agree with them. Same could be said about haters giving it a 1/10 based on 2 episodes only, but that's not even the point. Everything is a fucking issue for you, I see what your problem is.

"i mean they do in fact have portrayed them as good characters with some kindness in them"

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

the first 2 episodes paint the NSA in a terrible light, the politicians, the wives obsessed with status, the NSA breaking into the girls dorm and risking student safety, threatening the headmistress with a gun for simply asking for a warrant, the protest scene that showed tear gas and NSA agents beating people with sticks all of these scenes show how the NSA is evil. even young ro's roomate said something about the NSA calling all protestors communists and falsely arresting and killing protestors. so how are people still claiming that the NSA is being glorified?? maybe the NSA isn't acting as evil as they were in real life but i also think this may be because of censorship and viewer senstivity. like i feel like a scene of the girls getting full on tortured in the bath would be way more intense and triggering to real life survivors of the NSA and would just be trauamtic to watch for any audience. and just because they downplay scenes like that doesn't mean that they are glorifying the NSA. so much media centering around horrific historical events does this so that it isn't overwhelming to the audience. for example in the US we have so many war movies and movies on horrific events in our own history like 9/11, but these movies don't show genuine vulgar content that actually occurred in real life. that's why i'm a bit confused with this controversy. like would SK prefer the drama depicts vulgar and horrific scenes like this?

I would also include the scene in the 1st ep in which the crazy woman shot a gun on the projected image of ppl they were trying to catch adds even more evilness to that character. The show makes them as evil as possible within the censorship limits that a kdrama can give.

Are we even talking about the same show?

The nis is portrayed as evil in the show lol

"However the agenda so far in the show seems "
"SEEMS"

I didn't even read anything else after that part.
And yes, it's very anti-democratic that you get to choose what people can say or watch, if anyone here is spinning this issue is you.

How's that even connected to anything I said? But yes, I have my own opinion and will defend the show based on facts which is what i've seen in the first 2 episodes. I will also criticize it if I have find anything offensive in it, which I didn't so far. And you keep showing a very anti-democratic behaviour by not allowing others to have an opinion just bc you don't like a show that others do. Pathetic and ironic.

"I’m part Korean with my family members having first hand experience."
So is it a requirement now to talk about an issue if it mirrors your previous experiences in life? And no one ever said what happened wasn't an issue at all.

"Now, shut up."
isn't this what koreans were fighting against until 1987?

"And most Koreans agree"
Lmao, based on a petition anyone around the world can sign and create multiple accounts just to add more signatures?

"Use your brain sometime"
LOL

There's always something that will offend someone. What's your point? Besides that, there's nothing offensive in the first 2 eps.

You're the one who's making blinks like you look insane.

You accuse the drama of historical distortion and proceed to distort everything said by the writer. So fucking ironic. Why don't you just go ahead and tell us what your true intentions really are?

"had already researched the facts."
How can you research facts about a fictional show you didn't even watch? I did that by reading the fact check from naver on the first 2 eps, did you do the same?

Did you read the statement and the fact check or are you just repeating something you saw on twitter and tumblr?