for those who confused why the dragon's sister told phaya the one he loved is her sister in the previous life,…
It doesn't make sense and it makes me sad if it's the case but then I'm trying to look at it differently. I think some people are really into the fact that if it's a female character, they should be played by a female character but then, the other party said, there's no problem considering it's a BL and LGBTQ. We have to be open-minded and to consider that the actor played a female character and that's it.
This is what I didn't understand, unless they would be afraid that some people are going to throw tantrum if there's…
I don't have an issue with it as well, I find him really beautiful. You should put this in another comment to everyone to see it. It's a pity they don't have a pin option here
for those who confused why the dragon's sister told phaya the one he loved is her sister in the previous life,…
I know that Freen (Wansarut) is Tharn's past life and what I get from other people is to why they didn't let Freen playing Wansarut at that time but what we saw was Tharn disguised himself as Wansarut. Or maybe it's a media tool because as I said, the prod would be afraid of BL fandom but it doesn't make sense. I feel like it was ambiguous the way they want to convey the message that maybe Wansarut choose to take a male form. No but it's true that although Tharn is still pretty, I can unsee it haha but nevermind
I'm the only who understand that Wansarut told a side story that didn't mean to be her or am I mstaken? I thought she was talking like that to say 'yeah, there's a naga who took a man form' but it's weird for me if she told the story of herself or it's because how they show us, it was a bit ambiguous? This is what I don't udnerstand; I know, she said man like a man / boy Burut in Thai it's a man not Human. So I didn't know it was her story since she told it to Sakuna Nopparuj.
Well , I'm tred to understand, better to enjoy the cgi and the serie in general lol
Before season 2 I've seen some people already made some complain with details and although I kind of agree with them, I'm too lazy to be so picky sice they already show us some quality story and production. I won't argue with anyone, I'm tired. lol The thing is, if peope have problem then go asking the prod team lol
This is what I didn't understand, unless they would be afraid that some people are going to throw tantrum if there's…
The issue with Tharn it's because of the gender part but nevermind For Phaya it's because since he's a guy it's like with Chalothorn but then who knows it's a drama. But you mean, since they died then they automatically have to change their faces? That question is interesting. It's not me, you have to ask for the director or casting choices. I don't know either why they are doing that. The irony is because they used some sides actors as well so I don't thing it's not a big deal to change the main actors for the pas life as well.
Exactly, I thought they would be scared of some people was going to throw tantrum or be unhappy that Billy would…
Wait, ok but I think it's a misunderstanding, I mean, it's what Tharn's past life said but not his story. Wait, I don't know anymore lmao but thank you for your information!
i dont understand the comments about Tharn gender in the past, why are you caring about this that much , Tharn…
It confused people since Tharn's past life is a woman, even Phaya has drawn the woman so it could be logic to have Freen playing Wansarut.
What I think is, they could change it by making Phaya dream about Tharn in a traditional clothes, to make like in IFYLITA so Phaya could sense right away that yes he knew Tharn from a long time ago.
This is what I didn't understand, unless they would be afraid that some people are going to throw tantrum if there's…
Because since it's the past life, it's not Tharn's face it's a woman face. And Wanwisa said clearly it's her sister. It's because she reincarnated into a man. The doctor didn't that's why he bullied them each life and still a naga. . But it's interesting to say it's a tool used in media. I also thought it might just be for BL viewers to have Babe's acted in past life.
But I think,it's not a problem to have Babe's acting in past lfe but then they had to change since the beginning and say him, her brother not her sister. And they could make Phaya dreams about Tharn's face with different clothes (traditional clothes)
Exactly, I thought they would be scared of some people was going to throw tantrum or be unhappy that Billy would…
Then it's for satisfying BL viewers but it's indeed really weird from them. I agree, it's unprofessional. I said this because last time, thepast Wansarut said to Phaya "use your heart to see who I'm" so Phaya did and saw Tharn. But in today's episode, we should have an outsider point of view and as you siad, if Phaya used his heart, then he should asked why, the face is Tharn and not the woman he saw in his dreams. It was maybe a confusing writing. I don't know about the novel..I should maybe ask the writer if I can have a reply from her lol
Why wasn't Wansarut played by the girl Phaya saw in his dreams? It's ridiculous and confusing that they keep referring…
Exactly, I thought they would be scared of some people was going to throw tantrum or be unhappy that Billy would have some scene with the girl but to me I wouldn't mind it since we all know Freen played the âst life of Babe's character.
But I discussed with someone and they said that Phaya looked at his heart so he saw Tharn's face not the other woman but it confused since when you are watching what Phaya said to Wanwisa, they could just show us Freen instead of Babe. But anyway, I still love this episode. I wanted more. Why no 5 parts lol IDF really played on my nerves lol
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/C9ITOd9KkeQ
" They could have added a scene where first it was Freen then she shifted as Babe for better explanation though"
I totally agree with it!
After all it's a serie and it's just acting
I should do the same and don't want to defend any argument or what lol
https://youtu.be/FCFEjyLExx8?si=P6FoQWZTbq15f9Vz
Well , I'm tred to understand, better to enjoy the cgi and the serie in general lol
The thing is, if peope have problem then go asking the prod team lol
For Phaya it's because since he's a guy it's like with Chalothorn but then who knows it's a drama. But you mean, since they died then they automatically have to change their faces? That question is interesting. It's not me, you have to ask for the director or casting choices. I don't know either why they are doing that. The irony is because they used some sides actors as well so I don't thing it's not a big deal to change the main actors for the pas life as well.
What I think is, they could change it by making Phaya dream about Tharn in a traditional clothes, to make like in IFYLITA so Phaya could sense right away that yes he knew Tharn from a long time ago.
. But it's interesting to say it's a tool used in media. I also thought it might just be for BL viewers to have Babe's acted in past life.
But I think,it's not a problem to have Babe's acting in past lfe but then they had to change since the beginning and say him, her brother not her sister. And they could make Phaya dreams about Tharn's face with different clothes (traditional clothes)
But I discussed with someone and they said that Phaya looked at his heart so he saw Tharn's face not the other woman but it confused since when you are watching what Phaya said to Wanwisa, they could just show us Freen instead of Babe. But anyway, I still love this episode. I wanted more. Why no 5 parts lol
IDF really played on my nerves lol