FlowerWishes

Lily Alice, I've noticed this on two articles of yours and I thought I would let you know. You're spelling premiere incorrectly. You're spelling it as 'premiers' which is wrong. I thought I'd just tell you so you can fix it if you so wish.

All the ratings i referenced are for the uncut version. If you hover over the rating here you can see the breakdown I'm talking about. I know the difference between the two versions but I'm not comparing them, I'm looking at the ratings solely for this version.

Can someone explain to me how the average of the ratings of currently watching and verified stars is 7.6 and yet the rating is 6.5? I keep noticing this when dramas start that the rating is just off, way too low compared to the actual ratings, I'm so confused.

Um... that never happened. I have no idea where you are getting that nonsense but please refer to my reply above to Daenerys for some more information. But yeah, that never happened, they don't rape anyone.

Okay, this is the second time I've seen this 250K number and I have absolutely no idea where you are getting that completely incorrect number nor why you believe it but allow me to educate you. The figures provided by Hamas, the terrorist organization, are inflated, manipulated, and fabricated in an attempt to vilify Israel. Yet, even with all the bullshit they are saying and the stuff they've made up, they claim 45,500 deaths. That is more than 80% less than 250K. So, I am stunned at the absolute lack of knowledge among people and their ability to just read nonsense and believe it because they want justification for their beliefs and their hatred but I wouldn't go spouting that 250K number as you will sound uninformed. Also, I have no idea where you are getting this idea that IDF soldiers rape palestinians and protest to do so because that is complete nonsense. If you took a second to think about it, why in the world would soldiers protest so they can commit crimes. They do not rape people. They did not protest for that. That is just fabricated and you are really susceptible to lies if you didn't even stop to question the garbage you have been told. So, your comment is just a bunch of lies. I feel bad for you because you don't seem to be able to think critically, nor question anything you read, nor assess the credibility of claims. I hope with time that you learn how to do that because this is really worrying.

I'm not reporting you for who you support. That's none of my business and you can support whoever you want. I'm reporting you for saying that a terrorist attack that killed 1200 people and took 251 hostage was justified both legally and morally. The fact that you aren't even willing to read it says enough though.

They burnt babies in front of parents, they killed parents in front of their children, they slaughtered and raped people, they stabbed and shot people, they called their friends on the phone rejoicing and singing how they had "killed a Jew." I won't go any further because writing this makes me sick. I hope you never ever say anything like this again because it is dispicable.

I'm just gonna go ahead and report you for saying that a terrorist attack that resulted in the death (I'll get into detail later) of 1200 men, women, and children, and the taking of 251 hostages, the majority of which are still being held by Hamas, is moral and legal and justified because this is one of the most abhorrent things I have ever read. I don't think you can truly think you are a good and righteous person when you say that. Back to the terrorist attack. You clearly have no idea of what went on so I'll enlighten you in a spoiler comment because I don't want to put such violent atrocities in an unspoilered comment.

To Lily Alice, the author of this article: This is the most biased article I have ever seen, one which tries to discuss an incredibly complicated topic that people know jackshit about but have been lulled into the belief that they know everything. They have been persuaded by propoganda and lies and rely on incorrect statements, fake numbers, and their own feelings of self-righteousness to spread hate. I don't know why you think you are qualified to write an article about a war nor do I understand why you failed to mention why this war started, you know, the terrorist attack on Israel. Also, you have not stated any of the evidence against these genocide claims that has been brought forward because I 100% guarantee you that you don't know because your bias is so large that you couldn't possibly fathom that there are other sides to the story. Also, the reason Israel was brought to the ICJ was because Iran paid South African officials to take Israel to court for their own purposes. You know absolutely nothing and yet you have the GALL to write this article. Just say that people are mad because it resembles the Israel-Hamas war, don't try and explain a conflict you are neither qualified to talk about nor have any real knowledge about. Have a good day and stick to writing about celebrites and dramas please, thanks. Also, where are your sources?

I'm sure this incredibly young actor is going to reject his very first role. You might think he's old enough to make these decisions but you obviously aren't aware of how much pressure can be put on by producers and directors for younger actors to do things they aren't comfortable with. They may feel they have no choice bec asue, if they want to act and be in this industry, they can't get a reputation of being a "troublemaker." This is just a side tangent to the fact that the other actor is 33 years old but I'm just giving you some perspective on age and the industry, it doesn't mean I know for sure what happened in this situation because I don't. It's just something to think about.

It's still weird for me for them to be doing intimate scenes together. It makes me uncomfortable and it feels like the younger actor is being taken advantage of. I just can't help feeling that way when I know this age gap exists. Especially when they could've cast people of a much closer age. It just doesn't sit well with me.

Let me explain because so few people on this site seem to understand why and when age gaps pose a problem. I am not against age gap relationships when the ages of the two people are adequate and the gap is okay for their ages. That might sound confusing so I’ll give an example and I’ll use adults. A four year age gap doesn’t seem like a lot. However, there is a major difference between an 18 year dating a 22 year old and a 30 year old dating a 34 year old. An 18 year old should most definitely not be dating a 22 year old. There is too much of a gap in mental age, life experience, power dynamics etc. When you get old enough, the gap doesn't matter but when the younger person is still pretty young and the older one is way older, it poses a problem. It’s less about the numerical age and more about life stage, maturity, and power dynamics. I won’t bring in psychology because this comment is long enough. But a 22 year old is in a completely different life stage, a completely different level of maturity, and should not be in a relationship with a 33 year old. I know the actors are not in a relationship but them performing intimate scenes together is off putting to me, just the thought of it is unnerving and it kind of feels like the younger actor is being taken advantage of a bit. Also, just because both people consent to a relationship does not mean the relationship is healthy. Again, people can do whatever they want but I can find it wrong in the media I consume. I can have opinions which I base on research, psychology, and my own intuition.

Unfortunately, after a lot of snooping, I found out that Choi Sang Min is ELEVEN YEARS OLDER than Petch which goes to my theory that there is a large age gap there. Also, just the fact that Petch is 22 and Sang Min is 33 creeps me out so... The characters have to be quite far apart in age. I can see why there is room for interpretation based on how the synopsis is written but this fact worries me. Even if there is no age gap between the characters, I'm still creeped out and uncomfortable. Like, come on, he's eleven years older than this 22 year old who is still very young imho.

The phrase "very young at the time" worries me. Please don't be a creepily large age gap. Please. Like how many yeasr are we talking? Saying he is *very* young is a bad sign. OOF! Hoping for the best, preparing for the worst.

He's just three Billkins stacked on top of each other in a trench coat.

The drastic looking age gap between the 2nd leads is one of the only things I remember from the first watch back in August. It creeped me out too. I think it was more that the older guy was took on such a guardian role towards the younger one and so it was creepy that he would be romantically interested in him when he was like a parental figure. It just didn't sit right with me. It wasn't only their supposed ages, although that did play a role, it was more their dynamic that bothered me.

I watched 4 of the 5 episodes when it first came out before it was taken down. I remember skipping through them and then didn't bother watching the 5th one once I knew it was being taken down before the end. I'm on the fence about starting again. I would have to since I remember nothing aside from the 2nd couple looking very different in terms of age and that bothering me. Is it worth it? Maybe I should wait for more of it to air, I don't know.

ENOUGH WITH THE STEP BROTHER AND ADOPTED BROTHER THING, IT'S GROSS!!
The fact that I even have to say this is ridiculous. Why has this gotten so out of hand? Taiwan are the number one offenders here but Thailand doesn't get off scot-free. Please stop with the incestual relationships labelled as forbidden love. It's not forbidden love, they are related, they are siblings, it is incest!

It focuses on her story, so to speak, which is about their friendship. It focuses on them as a package, I guess, and their friendship story. It doesn't focus solely on her, it's about them. At least that's what I can guess from the synopsis elsewhere and what some people have said below.

No worries! Glad I could help!