I have seen all previous comments you made before in this page. I kept silent then but the fact you keep coming…
If that is what it means to get you to stop your narrative and spinning of thing's and have a discussion with you....then I hereby publicly declare that I want a space in Zhu Yan's harem and also declare Zhou Yichen my rival in love (acknowledged as the strongest contender and ill fight tooth and nail for my man)
And I rest my case henceforth with that declaration, you seem to like the attention so ive said all i need to say, wont engage you further
Hello Jenny, congrats you got me to actually sign up after being a spectator for so longJust know I've read almost…
I'm not here to bash you, I'm only here to (call you out) voice out my opinion on the post you made above
For your point regarding the story (I think i acknowledged that earlier and also said i won't go into that and gave reason for it. You indeed made some points for reflection which I liked but ultimately it's just summed up as you wanting the story to be written according to what you believe to be an intellectual depiction of fictional characters who mind you had so much depth underneath and so many deep themes (even if it wasn't executed in the best way I'll admit and) and I know everyone perspective differs and that seems to firmly be yours
I decided to comment on the ml character because apparently that was a prominent point you had (strongly if I dare say) and how it lead me to conclude you want the story to go your own way definitively
When you say here now you understand he's just following a script I'm sorry I'm inclined that's not what your overall comments eluded to. I'll leave your just one of your comments here "This whole series could be better off without the ml honestly, the 2ml literally outperformed him in all aspects" This coupled with other comments clearly showed where you stand and doesn't just scream "I understand his following a script and I'm not referring to the actor". You seem to value intectual discourse so I believe you know that's there's something called subtext and reading between the lines tells a lot which i gladly decided to read into and make my submission.
Don't have the time right now to edit to make complete sense so lol sorry to whoever who reads this, try to read into it for me
Hello Jenny, congrats you got me to actually sign up after being a spectator for so longJust know I've read almost…
@homaKP I'm lost, new to posting here so if you could help me out...did you reply directly to me or op. Wondering if that's how it works here cos it looked like the reply was directly tagged on mine
I noticed a lot of people here who don't like sometimes about this Drama but scared to talk.Just don't be scared…
Hello Jenny, congrats you got me to actually sign up after being a spectator for so long Just know I've read almost all the comments on this discussion page since the beginning as its one of the most enjoyable comment section ( i actually enjoy it better than the drama lol) and i can confidently say In this space people here generally are very respectful of others opinions even if it different from theirs (and they most certainly had a cordial discussion with you especially regarding the plot/drama so i wont go into that)
Now back to you 1. You come here this time to try to paint a scenario for new watchers which actually isn't the case cos how many people will actually go down to read on all comments, so effectively during this time whoever comments will effectively shape viewers perception
2. You in no way actually voiced out dissatisfaction about the drama only, you focused on one actor and his ml potrayal saying the drama would be better off without him (taking it beyond the character) which made it clear who and were you were coming from and the "warriors" engaged based on that also You disregard the character design and make it look like it's the actors fault the director and writer wrote the character that way, which he had no choice to follow (the ml absolutely slayed his role by the way and that is a fact)....how Is this in anyway a constructive criticism...what it shows instead is either 1. You didn't fully watch the show 2. You watched but couldn't truly understand everything in it 3. You couldnt set aside personal judgement (you claim not to be biased so I wont use that) because if you truly did some comments wont even be made
This is getting long, and I know its best to ignore but when you come post something like this...it's really telling. From now on, if you comment just know I have your time. I hope I came across as civil as you wanted
Also just because you like the character design of 2ml (considering he was written and developed better than the rest if you truly want to be critical but thats another convo i won't engage on with anyone as it still worked out for the drama in the end).. doesn't mean he outperformed anyone
Everyone in this drama did what they could with what they were given, balanced each other nicely and created a nice synergy all round which benefitted it
It's perfectly fine to have a character and even actor you like..no one can stop you on that but please its enough dont try to mislead new audiences Have a nice day
And I rest my case henceforth with that declaration, you seem to like the attention so ive said all i need to say, wont engage you further
For your point regarding the story (I think i acknowledged that earlier and also said i won't go into that and gave reason for it. You indeed made some points for reflection which I liked but ultimately it's just summed up as you wanting the story to be written according to what you believe to be an intellectual depiction of fictional characters who mind you had so much depth underneath and so many deep themes (even if it wasn't executed in the best way I'll admit and) and I know everyone perspective differs and that seems to firmly be yours
I decided to comment on the ml character because apparently that was a prominent point you had (strongly if I dare say) and how it lead me to conclude you want the story to go your own way definitively
When you say here now you understand he's just following a script I'm sorry I'm inclined that's not what your overall comments eluded to. I'll leave your just one of your comments here
"This whole series could be better off without the ml honestly, the 2ml literally outperformed him in all aspects"
This coupled with other comments clearly showed where you stand and doesn't just scream "I understand his following a script and I'm not referring to the actor". You seem to value intectual discourse so I believe you know that's there's something called subtext and reading between the lines tells a lot which i gladly decided to read into and make my submission.
Don't have the time right now to edit to make complete sense so lol sorry to whoever who reads this, try to read into it for me
Thanks for helping me understand
Just know I've read almost all the comments on this discussion page since the beginning as its one of the most enjoyable comment section ( i actually enjoy it better than the drama lol) and i can confidently say In this space people here generally are very respectful of others opinions even if it different from theirs (and they most certainly had a cordial discussion with you especially regarding the plot/drama so i wont go into that)
Now back to you
1. You come here this time to try to paint a scenario for new watchers which actually isn't the case cos how many people will actually go down to read on all comments, so effectively during this time whoever comments will effectively shape viewers perception
2. You in no way actually voiced out dissatisfaction about the drama only, you focused on one actor and his ml potrayal saying the drama would be better off without him (taking it beyond the character) which made it clear who and were you were coming from and the "warriors" engaged based on that also
You disregard the character design and make it look like it's the actors fault the director and writer wrote the character that way, which he had no choice to follow (the ml absolutely slayed his role by the way and that is a fact)....how Is this in anyway a constructive criticism...what it shows instead is either 1. You didn't fully watch the show 2. You watched but couldn't truly understand everything in it 3. You couldnt set aside personal judgement (you claim not to be biased so I wont use that) because if you truly did some comments wont even be made
This is getting long, and I know its best to ignore but when you come post something like this...it's really telling. From now on, if you comment just know I have your time. I hope I came across as civil as you wanted
Also just because you like the character design of 2ml (considering he was written and developed better than the rest if you truly want to be critical but thats another convo i won't engage on with anyone as it still worked out for the drama in the end).. doesn't mean he outperformed anyone
Everyone in this drama did what they could with what they were given, balanced each other nicely and created a nice synergy all round which benefitted it
It's perfectly fine to have a character and even actor you like..no one can stop you on that but please its enough dont try to mislead new audiences
Have a nice day