Vincenzo Cassano

Yeah, it was ok. They don't seem like a match, infact it was proven they're not fated. The FL is fated with her dead husband. They're just lovers. Unless you believe you have many fated lovers, then is that really fate or just an excuse to sleep around. The reveal of the ML being in love with the princess, therefore it wasn't a forced marriage. That just seemed forced to me. It's like they added that because the FL loved her husband. So they had to make them equals. I didn't find the 14 year old with the 24 awkward, because they didn't do anything together, but i agree they could've made the crown prince older, it wouldn't have changed anything to the story.

The 14 year old crown prince with the 24 year old woman😂 love it.

Ah, you're right. It's not a romcom. I forgot to check the genre😅 For some reason, i thought it was. Ok, never mind, proceed.

Is he really a cheater, or is there some misunderstanding?

Settle down everyone. The FL isn't ending up with the SML. It just doesn't work. Remember Love Alarm?

Wait, what parallel universe have I entered. Since when does the FL end up with the SML?

Why not the ML? Isn't the ML supposed to support the FL? They are married after all.

Is her husband a good or bad guy?

The FL's home looks exactly the same as the ML's home in Rookie Historian Goo Hae Ryung. Everything looks the same from the pond, the balcony, the garden, the stairs, the big tree at the front, and the entry. I think they've used this place in a few dramas.

But he doesn't know that.

I'm up to episode 7, and i initially thought there weren't any love triangles, but in a way, there kind of is from what I've seen so far. It's between the ML, FL, and her deceased husband. She loved him and often thinks about him, and even though he's dead, it feels like the ML is competing with him for her love. Before watching when i read she's a widow, i thought it was like the situation the ML is in where she didn't really know him or loved him, just a forced marriage. It's kind of disappointing, i was hoping he'd be her first and only love, just like she's his first and only love.

Does her having a son cause any conflict or misunderstandings between the leads? I would think once he found out she has a son, he would probably pull back.

Wait, i thought this is a remake or adaptation of the Japanese drama Silent. But it's not listed under related content. Isn't it basically the same story?

Yes, i just learned what happened after checking the Japanese original drama. I doubt that will happen here, but i do think there will be a prominent love triangle.

Yes, thank you. I read previous comments and learned what happened.

Interesting. If the ML cheated on the FL, would you still think the same? Would you still defend him like you're defending the FL? So it's not ok for the ML to almost be kissed by his ex, but it's ok for the FL to cheat on him? Not an almost cheat, but actually cheating? So before the incident, she wasn't a bad character. Does that make everything ok? Does she get a free pass because she was good before the incident? Or is she getting a free pass because she's a female character? What about if a murderer is good before he/she commits murder. They shouldn't get hate because they were good before the murder? I'm just trying to understand your logic. At the moment, the only conclusion i come to is your defending her because she's female. I know you believe what she did was wrong, so why are you defending her?

What's the the act?

I'm not biased when it comes to gender or beauty. I'll watch all characters no matter if they're male, female, handsome, pretty, or ugly. I'm not biased towards gender or beauty like you are. You even proved it in your original comment. You skipped the scenes of the evil SFL because she's female, while at the same time watching the SML, (who's the exact equivalent of the SFL) because he's handsome. I can see you've already changed your words in your original comment so as to not make it sound more gender biased. Nice try, but I'm not buying it.

Ok, getting better. At least you're not insulting and swearing anymore. But you're still avoiding the topic in question as to why you can easily watch an evil, malicious, conniving SML but will skip the scenes involving the SFL with the same traits as the SML. It's simple really. It's because he's a handsome male, and that trumps everything. Gender it is then. You don't need to respond. I already know the answer. Good night, and sweet dreams. Hopefully, you can dream about handsome SML's even if they're evil.

Why are you insulting and cursing? Did i insult you? It seems like i was right about it being about gender. Otherwise, you wouldn't have come out triggered in a rage, feeling the need to use such derogatory language and insults. We were having a civil conversation, and you had to turn into conflict. All you had to do was say it's not about gender and give your reasons why. But maybe you can't answer that. Therefore, i think it is about gender. I get it. A handsome man, even though he's evil, will be favoured by the majority, even shipping him with the FL. It's nothing new. It happens all the time. Now, how will you respond? Getting angry and swearing like a child or responding in kind like a mature adult?