I dropped it immediately when i realised there are parts where there are no sound or subtitles. You can't enjoy a drama like that. It's unfortunate. It seems like a good watch.
More romance dominant. The romance might be just a sub-plot and is secondary to the main story. Whereas the romance i prefer would be the foundation and fundamental to the main story.
I give it an 8.5. Very good story, just not enough romance. I have a question I'll put under a spoiler for the…
When the FL was sent back to hell when Bael and Gabriel were there, why does she still look the same? That's not her Demon appearance. She should look like how she appeared in the first episode. And what ever happened to the real Bitna? She was mistakenly sent to hell, and the last time we saw her was in the beginning when she was chased by those demon hounds. They didn't explain that part.
I don't know when it will finish airing, but I'll need this after watching The Judge From Hell with it's small amount of romance. Not enough to satisfy me.
It's not that good. It's not the story i wanted. It shows them together when they met in the past, but not much is shown in the present. I would've preferred it the other way around. And the SML part is useless. They're friends, and then all of a sudden, without any notice, they're engaged and trying on wedding clothes, but he hasn't proposed yet??? And she doesn't even like him. Pointless.
This a beautiful romance with 2 endings (HE and SE) There is no love triangle, 1FL only had eyes for 1ML.
Yeah Yeah, and the moon is made of cheese. You're right, you are out, out of your mind. "It's not a love triangle."Relationships can only be the romantic kind."😂 What a stupid comment.
This a beautiful romance with 2 endings (HE and SE) There is no love triangle, 1FL only had eyes for 1ML.
I'm not here to argue either, I'm trying to educate you. You have this narrow-minded belief that a love triangle is one of a kind and can only be one thing.
You've also completely misinterpreted MDL's definition. MDL states a love triangle is, "The depiction of a romantic attraction or relationship involving three people."
You're completely ignoring the part where it says OR relationship involving three people. If what you say about love triangles is correct, then MDL wouldn't need to add the second part about the relationship involving three people. They would've just stated the depiction of a romantic attraction involving three people. The word "relationship" doesn't always mean romantically. You see, your logic is flawed. It doesn't make any sense.
This a beautiful romance with 2 endings (HE and SE) There is no love triangle, 1FL only had eyes for 1ML.
That's wrong. Your second link could've been written by anyone with their own idea of what a love triangle is. That doesn't make it correct.
There are different types of love triangles. You are describing only one version. There needs to be at least three people involved to form a love triangle, and it can go a few ways.
1. B and C likes A, but A only likes one.
2. B and C likes A and A likes both.
3. A likes B, B likes C, and C likes A.
4. B and C likes A, but A doesn't like any of them, but they would have to be constantly together hanging out with each other. This one is not a typical love triangle, but it still involves three people, so it falls under that category.
It's not black and white. There are different types of love triangles. But to deny it as a love triangle is ludicrous. So the next time someone asks about love triangles, they're asking if there are SML's or SFL's involved with the main leads regardless of whether the ML or FL likes any of the second leads.
You've also completely misinterpreted MDL's definition. MDL states a love triangle is, "The depiction of a romantic attraction or relationship involving three people."
You're completely ignoring the part where it says OR relationship involving three people. If what you say about love triangles is correct, then MDL wouldn't need to add the second part about the relationship involving three people. They would've just stated the depiction of a romantic attraction involving three people. The word "relationship" doesn't always mean romantically. You see, your logic is flawed. It doesn't make any sense.
There are different types of love triangles. You are describing only one version. There needs to be at least three people involved to form a love triangle, and it can go a few ways.
1. B and C likes A, but A only likes one.
2. B and C likes A and A likes both.
3. A likes B, B likes C, and C likes A.
4. B and C likes A, but A doesn't like any of them, but they would have to be constantly together hanging out with each other. This one is not a typical love triangle, but it still involves three people, so it falls under that category.
It's not black and white. There are different types of love triangles. But to deny it as a love triangle is ludicrous. So the next time someone asks about love triangles, they're asking if there are SML's or SFL's involved with the main leads regardless of whether the ML or FL likes any of the second leads.