Quantcast

Details

  • Last Online: Feb 26, 2026
  • Location:
  • Contribution Points: 0 LV0
  • Roles:
  • Join Date: March 7, 2024
Replying to GigglySnickerDoodle May 4, 2025
It's those with the most personal issues or baggage who get the most upset about other people's gay ships. Have…
"I didn’t jump into anyone’s shipping comment"

You did, you inserted yourself into another person's comment thread to pose an insensitive question about "what's wrong with being homophobic" and demanded they refrain from "bringing" their "bullshit" ships here
8 0
Replying to GigglySnickerDoodle May 4, 2025
It's those with the most personal issues or baggage who get the most upset about other people's gay ships. Have…
By "genuine fans," do you mean those of you who comment with the purpose of attacking our characters, ridiculing our ships, and playing the victim when we defend ourselves?

@Gomen left a comment questioning the validity of finding fault with homophobia. Did you see that? They asked, "what's wrong with being homophobic?"
Comment: https://imgur.com/bAprQSO

These people aren't taking offense to the term. They're aware of their comments' inflammatory nature. What's your motivation for standing up for them? What do you get out of it?

"NOT everyone who disagrees with BL interpretations is being hateful"

I know, I'm responding to the hateful ones
10 2
On Mouse May 3, 2025
Title Mouse
Thank goodness the drama didn’t waste too much time on the joke of a "relationship" between Ba Reum and Bong I. Girl deserved someone mentally stable who doesn't see her as a pawn in their chess game

Ba Reum had more chemistry with his bed than he ever did with Bong I. Even Mu Chi brought more heat to their interactions
3 4
Replying to GigglySnickerDoodle May 3, 2025
It's those with the most personal issues or baggage who get the most upset about other people's gay ships. Have…
"I never said you can’t discuss it"

Your earlier comment contradicts that. "I don’t want that to happen to this drama too" suggests you'd prefer certain topics, such as shipping, not be discussed

"... told me to stop talking about it"

I didn't, I told you to please stop making disparaging comments about shippers and assuming they are "isolated, lonely weirdos"
12 6
Replying to pristine May 3, 2025
What's wrong with being "homophobic"
I'm not going to pretend every emotionally charged moment between two people of the same sex is "platonic"
13 2
Replying to GigglySnickerDoodle May 3, 2025
It's those with the most personal issues or baggage who get the most upset about other people's gay ships. Have…
Aren't you forcing your anti-shipping preferences on others? You're contributing to the same toxic, unwelcoming environment you mentioned for fans who enjoy the drama in their unique way

It's not up to you, me, or anyone else to control what people discuss in the comment section. They can discuss the plot, their favorite ships, etc
21 8
Replying to pristine May 3, 2025
Kinda glad they took out the romance angle by removing that girlie from season one completely. I’m a sucker…
It's those with the most personal issues or baggage who get the most upset about other people's gay ships. Have you tried channeling your energy inward, rather than lashing out at us?

You enjoy the male characters’ friendships as they are, I understand that and I'm not asking you to ship them. I'm simply requesting that you be open to understanding other people's interpretations of their relationships, even if they differ from your own
28 13
Replying to pristine May 3, 2025
What's wrong with being "homophobic"
Our use of the term "homophobia" isn't intended to target all fans of friendships. We're addressing those who engage in harassment and denigration of our appreciation for same-sex romances

Our gay ships don’t invalidate your preference for friendships, and your preference for friendships don't invalidate our gay ships
16 0
Replying to pristine May 3, 2025
What's wrong with being "homophobic"
What’s wrong with flaunting your ignorance and moral bankruptcy? Besides everything
20 0
Replying to yumna23 May 3, 2025
finally someone speaking facts and not garbage like these other sick people..!!
We're not sick, we're spreading greatness!
16 15
Replying to naopisgram May 3, 2025
Honestly, if they had made it into a normal straight drama, it would have been better. it just could be a straight…
Writing their own straight story from the get-go would've been more respectful than altering existing gay narratives
22 0
Replying to goldfish May 3, 2025
they always do, but are the first to scream men and women can have a platonic friendship but apparently 2 persons…
Society assumes that men and women can't be "just friends," or that two men or two women can't be more than "just friends." We’re balancing things out with our gay ships
11 0
Replying to Winter May 2, 2025
'Love' doesn't have to be romantic. Si-eun is in love with Su-ho, that much is obvious. Shippers just take anything…
No worries!

Some fans prefer to stick with what's established in the source material. I won't hold it against you if you don't share my non-canonical shipping preferences
8 0
Replying to Calicomoon May 2, 2025
Only if you stop underplaying the director's (and the actors') words for once.
At this point, they could confess their love mid-makeout and someone would still go, "they’re besties with really close lips!"
10 1
Replying to Winter May 2, 2025
'Love' doesn't have to be romantic. Si-eun is in love with Su-ho, that much is obvious. Shippers just take anything…
Not all shippers are "insufferable." Most of us understand that our enthusiasm for certain character relationships might not be shared by everyone

You see friendship, and I see a spark of something more. A spark that could ignite a flame of romantic love and passion. Isn't it fascinating how two people can look at the same thing and see it differently?
12 2
Replying to JordanHarrison May 2, 2025
"It is not that the two of them literally have romantic feelings for each other. It is more like the structure…
The director was saying, "they're not in love, but they are and have a serious case of the heart eyes lolz"
22 1
Replying to Calicomoon May 2, 2025
Only if you stop underplaying the director's (and the actors') words for once.
It won't become a BL with the likely homophobic backlash that would follow
10 3
Replying to Calicomoon May 2, 2025
Only if you stop underplaying the director's (and the actors') words for once.
The director deserves praise for acknowledging the romantic connection between the male characters. And though I'd love to see this evolve into a full-fledged BL/gay story, I understand the potential homophobic backlash would hinder such progress. The negative comments directed at our community prove it

I'm satisfied with the strong chemistry and confirmation we've been given
12 0
Replying to Calicomoon May 2, 2025
Do you see a BL tag anywhere?? No right, so yeah, it is not a BL. As an avid consumer of media, including queer…
Exactly, romance doesn't have to be the focus of a story for fans to see romantic potential between characters. With or without a (gay) romance tag, we might interpret certain interactions as having romantic subtext and ship characters accordingly
16 0