Uneducated woman, learn to measure your words. Who gives you the right to insult people from behind the keyboard? You have thrown serious accusations without any evidence and without any legal support. Stop harassing and wait for the official results, because you are not the one dispensing justice. If you are so sure of yourself, go to the police, submit the evidence and declare what you know. Until then, stop being rude. If you have real evidence, show it. If not, shut up.
lovelydove419 "Thank GOD this show never premiered"Show some decency for the work of hundreds of people…
Girl, all you wrote is... šš¤£š leave me with your diploma and go to school first, your level is street level. We wasted our time trying to explain basic things to you, but when it comes to education ur on the last lvl. š§ empty, just a lot of talk and insults, nothing else. No joke, when I hear "cheap," the first name that comes into my mind is... you.
lovelydove419 "Thank GOD this show never premiered"Show some decency for the work of hundreds of people…
Girl, I canāt even reply ššš youāre killing me with your repetitive āintelligenceā⦠I see youāre liking your own comments too š¤£š¤£š¤£
lovelydove419 "Thank GOD this show never premiered"Show some decency for the work of hundreds of people…
š¤£š fr, I know someone who studied ālawā š somewhere in America, exact same lvl of āintelligenceā š btw gimme ur number so u can coach me in the art of embarrassing myself online šš¤£
@user462, she blocked me so I can't really respondš« .... Such childish behavior is honestly foolishness of the…
I think they react this way because they cannot sustain the discussion with real arguments and evidence, but only with gossip and perverse words. These types of subjects probably capture their attention because their level of maturity and understanding is limited. In the absence of real studies, they cling to imaginary ādiplomasā to try to give themselves an authority that, in fact, they do not have.
KSH played a major role in what happened to KSR and Sulli. I feel that he pushed Sulli into doing scenes she wasnāt…
How can you draw such conclusions when even from the evidence released by her mother In a memo claimed to have been sent to the actor on September 28, 2017 we could see that KSR's letter said "I have been hurt by many men so oppa i want to be with you". If she had other previous relationships, why would you accuse Kim Soo hyun of having a relationship with her when she was a minor? Why don't you accuse the others, since they were only in her life before Kim Soo hyun? Are you omitting this on purpose because you absolutely want to accuse him? What does say this about you?
Whatās your take on this https://x.com/moon_ki95/status/1994005757701013972?s=20?
According to lawyer, the bereaved family has distributed materials about the deceasedās private life that are unrelated to actor Kim Soo-hyun, ignoring repeated requests to protect her honor. The texts portray emotional instability and dependence on men and contradict other allegedly authentic materials, indicating deliberate manipulation. Lawyer emphasizes that the family continues to present themselves as victims and has threatened disciplinary action against critics. In light of these facts, the responsibility for defamation and public opinion manipulation lies with the family. Even if they attempt to present false materials as āevidence,ā falsehoods do not become truth.
The mother is fighting back. I wonder why is KSH so stubborn?
[Immoral behavior of the bereaved family who distort and spread the deceasedās private life unrelated to the actor, and their legal responsibility ā request for media investigation] Two weeks ago, I publicly requested that the bereaved family refrain from distributing any writings or materials unrelated to actor Kim Soo-hyun if they truly intended to protect the deceasedās honor, to prevent further offenses and secondary harm to the actor. I also asked fans not to unnecessarily provoke the deceasedās family. Nonetheless, yesterday, the bereaved family directly distributed to the media materials regarding the deceasedās private life, entirely unrelated to actor Kim Soo-hyun, prominently using the title āSaeronās Mother.ā This behavior is very similar to their bizarre actions in March, when, in collusion with Gaseyeon (an online media outlet), they created and circulated an AI video of the deceased for image-making purposes. 1. Malicious actions forcing a link to the actor I criticized the bereaved family yesterday for irresponsibly ignoring my warnings and requests and publicly releasing source-unknown writings, artificially connecting them to actor Kim Soo-hyun. The family knew that the content portrayed the deceased as āunable to live without a man, as if suffering from bipolar disorder,ā yet they still distributed it, associating it with the actor. If the writing released yesterday was truly authored by Kim Saeron in her second year of high school, it describes her emotional suffering over romantic relationships and ends with a bizarre laugh such as āć ć ć¹ć¹ć¹ć ć ć ć ć ć¹ć¹ć¹ć¹ā¦ā. Anyone reading it would perceive emotional instability or bipolar traits. I personally found it deeply unsettling. The released text was not the version the family initially intended to disclose, and I know firsthand that the family had considered carefully whether to make it public, which proves they understood the serious harm it could cause to the deceasedās honor. Indeed, there had already been tabloid-like rumors stating that the family possessed materials that could make the deceased appear as a frivolous woman regarding men. Despite knowing this, the family ultimately released the material, seemingly to sway public opinion ahead of the investigation results, sacrificing the deceasedās honor in the process. The responsibility for portraying a minor deceased as āemotionally unstable and dependent on menā lies solely with the family. 2. Contradictions between materials and clear evidence of deliberate false information dissemination Furthermore, the text released by the family directly contradicts other content they claimed was a threatening handwritten letter from the deceased (to her first and only love, a six-year relationship since middle school). Because the family collected photos and chat logs from the deceasedās phone and cloud, without being able to identify any specific male, they attempted to attribute everything to a single person, resulting in materials with no consistency. The family already knew that the false letters and statements used in March 2024 to cancel a debt of 700 million won were fabricated. The text released yesterday serves as further proof. This demonstrates that the family acted intentionally, effectively admitting their awareness of falsity. 3. Position and plan regarding the exploitation of the deceased minorās private life for public manipulation The familyās recently announced statement reflects no self-reflection and is purely an attempt to play the victim. Instead, they continue to threaten me, even mentioning potential bar association disciplinary action. Initially, I planned to minimize responses, but given their two-day pattern of public manipulation, I have decided to actively respond through the media against defamation and opinion manipulation. If the family continues to trample on the deceasedās honor, I will have no choice but to seriously consider revealing evidence about the deceasedās real life and family relationships, which have until now been protected. I still hope this can be avoided, but the situation is becoming unavoidable. I will soon release an official statement regarding the familyās recent statement. Even the absurd discussion about cats at the beginning leaves me frustrated. (Photos that fans found in just a few hours are attached. If they are incorrect, the family may refute them.) The number of cats and their names are very well known by the deceasedās sibling. If the family still issued a false statement, this again constitutes clear evidence of deliberate falsity, A.I., criminal intent. Even if the family tries to claim materials unrelated to the actor as āevidenceā and adds another 100 lies left by the deceased, falsehood does not become truth.
He even changed her cats name: https://x.com/moon_ki95/status/1994005757701013972?s=20
The claims that the names of the cats were changed from āPatteokā and āKkultteokā to āDalā and āGureumā because of Kim Soo-hyun are factually unfounded and cannot be supported by objective evidence. From publicly verifiable data (news articles and old social media posts), it is clear that: -- The actual original names were āChaltteokā and āHotteokā, not those cited in the accusations. --There is no evidence of a ārenaming,ā as the names Chaltteok, Hotteok, Dal, and Gureum coexisted and were publicly mentioned by Kim Sae-ron between 2018ā2020. --There are documented mentions indicating that Dal and Gureum were already 1 year old in March 2019, which completely invalidates the timeline invoked by the accusers. The attempt to construct a supposed relationship between Kim Soo-hyun and Kim Sae-ron by interpreting the names of animals does not constitute evidence, but speculation, with no probative value. Moreover, public information suggests that if these names could be associated with a real person, they appear to be much more closely linked to an idol member, with whom Kim Sae-ron seemed close both during her minor years and afterward. This directly contradicts the direction in which suspicions are being forcibly oriented. Therefore, using the catsā names as āevidenceā constitutes: --a distortion of facts, --a speculative construction, --and an attempt to manipulate public opinion. Turning private and legally irrelevant elements into pseudo-evidence does not constitute a valid legal argument. The conclusion is clear: Credible accusations cannot be built based on symbolic interpretations of the names of animals. Responsibility for spreading these claims lies both with those who formulated them and the media outlets that reproduced them without minimal verification of the facts.
OLD ARTICLES:
āSnail Hotelā ā Kim Sae-ron Seen with Her Adorable Cat Reporter: Park Hanna, September 12, 2018, 16:49 Kim Sae-ron, known for her beauty and close relationship with her family, frequently posts on SNS expressing her love for her parents and siblings. In one post, she writes āour little darlingā and shares a photo of her cat. Kim Sae-ronās cats, named Chaltteok and Hotteok, also draw attention for their subtle and charming demeanor.
Kim Sae-ron Shows Off Her Smart Pet Owner Life, Home Looks Like a Hotel (OSEN) Reporter Park So-young, April 21, 2020, 17:59 Actress Kim Sae-ron shared a glimpse of her clever life as a pet owner. On the 20th, Kim Sae-ron posted a photo on her Instagram with the message: āStaying at home with Gu and Aron.ā In the photo, she is holding her cat while also holding a bag of snacks.
weird enough to think of a hunger strike for someone (you don't personally know) being alleged with possible crime
The same rule applies to you: you donāt know him either, yet you try to slander him. Support never causes harm, while toxicity and defamation have real consequences
Kim Soo Hyun Was Never Given a Fair Chance - How a Witch-Hunt Began and Why a Lawyer Added Fuel to It
1. When the controversy involving Soo Hyun and the late Kim Sae Ron began, online platforms treated him as guilty before any facts were confirmed. AI-edited audio, misleading photos, and his repeated denials were ignored.
What happened was a clear witch-hunt and large-scale cyberbullying that eventually forced him into a tearful press conference
2. At that time, attorney Lee Don Ho livestreamed the press conference. Many viewers felt his tone was mocking.
His thumbnails used phrases like āfull makeupā and ācrying hardā and even words like āredemption planā which made Kim Soo Hyun look as if he were already a criminal.
A video titled āEven if he met a middle school girl, punishment is difficultā created a harmful misunderstanding, even though no such meeting was ever proven. A single phrase distorted public perception.
3. Because a lawyerās voice carries authority, reactions like his give online mobs justification. He continued posting videos and shorts about the press conference, and fans told me they felt he was benefiting from growing traffic. Some said they were shocked to see him pleased when his content appeared on TV.
4. From the beginning, I saw the presumption of innocence collapsing. The truth was getting buried under edited clips and speculative narratives.
I defended Kim Soo Hyun not because it helped me but because it was the right thing to do. What I saw was a man overwhelmed by misinformation and public pressure.
5. This issue goes beyond one actor or one lawyer. As YouTube sensationalism grows, some attorneys now rely on viral outrage instead of professional judgment. This harms public trust and damages the legal community. The Korean Bar Association should address this seriously and protect the integrity of the profession.
Justice should not be shaped by algorithms or public anger. It must be based on facts and fairness.
Stop harassing and wait for the official results, because you are not the one dispensing justice. If you are so sure of yourself, go to the police, submit the evidence and declare what you know.
Until then, stop being rude. If you have real evidence, show it. If not, shut up.
You have secured your place in hell
Lawyer emphasizes that the family continues to present themselves as victims and has threatened disciplinary action against critics. In light of these facts, the responsibility for defamation and public opinion manipulation lies with the family.
Even if they attempt to present false materials as āevidence,ā falsehoods do not become truth.
Two weeks ago, I publicly requested that the bereaved family refrain from distributing any writings or materials unrelated to actor Kim Soo-hyun if they truly intended to protect the deceasedās honor, to prevent further offenses and secondary harm to the actor. I also asked fans not to unnecessarily provoke the deceasedās family.
Nonetheless, yesterday, the bereaved family directly distributed to the media materials regarding the deceasedās private life, entirely unrelated to actor Kim Soo-hyun, prominently using the title āSaeronās Mother.ā This behavior is very similar to their bizarre actions in March, when, in collusion with Gaseyeon (an online media outlet), they created and circulated an AI video of the deceased for image-making purposes.
1. Malicious actions forcing a link to the actor
I criticized the bereaved family yesterday for irresponsibly ignoring my warnings and requests and publicly releasing source-unknown writings, artificially connecting them to actor Kim Soo-hyun. The family knew that the content portrayed the deceased as āunable to live without a man, as if suffering from bipolar disorder,ā yet they still distributed it, associating it with the actor.
If the writing released yesterday was truly authored by Kim Saeron in her second year of high school, it describes her emotional suffering over romantic relationships and ends with a bizarre laugh such as āć ć ć¹ć¹ć¹ć ć ć ć ć ć¹ć¹ć¹ć¹ā¦ā. Anyone reading it would perceive emotional instability or bipolar traits. I personally found it deeply unsettling.
The released text was not the version the family initially intended to disclose, and I know firsthand that the family had considered carefully whether to make it public, which proves they understood the serious harm it could cause to the deceasedās honor. Indeed, there had already been tabloid-like rumors stating that the family possessed materials that could make the deceased appear as a frivolous woman regarding men.
Despite knowing this, the family ultimately released the material, seemingly to sway public opinion ahead of the investigation results, sacrificing the deceasedās honor in the process. The responsibility for portraying a minor deceased as āemotionally unstable and dependent on menā lies solely with the family.
2. Contradictions between materials and clear evidence of deliberate false information dissemination
Furthermore, the text released by the family directly contradicts other content they claimed was a threatening handwritten letter from the deceased (to her first and only love, a six-year relationship since middle school).
Because the family collected photos and chat logs from the deceasedās phone and cloud, without being able to identify any specific male, they attempted to attribute everything to a single person, resulting in materials with no consistency.
The family already knew that the false letters and statements used in March 2024 to cancel a debt of 700 million won were fabricated. The text released yesterday serves as further proof. This demonstrates that the family acted intentionally, effectively admitting their awareness of falsity.
3. Position and plan regarding the exploitation of the deceased minorās private life for public manipulation
The familyās recently announced statement reflects no self-reflection and is purely an attempt to play the victim. Instead, they continue to threaten me, even mentioning potential bar association disciplinary action.
Initially, I planned to minimize responses, but given their two-day pattern of public manipulation, I have decided to actively respond through the media against defamation and opinion manipulation.
If the family continues to trample on the deceasedās honor, I will have no choice but to seriously consider revealing evidence about the deceasedās real life and family relationships, which have until now been protected. I still hope this can be avoided, but the situation is becoming unavoidable.
I will soon release an official statement regarding the familyās recent statement.
Even the absurd discussion about cats at the beginning leaves me frustrated. (Photos that fans found in just a few hours are attached. If they are incorrect, the family may refute them.) The number of cats and their names are very well known by the deceasedās sibling. If the family still issued a false statement, this again constitutes clear evidence of deliberate falsity, A.I., criminal intent.
Even if the family tries to claim materials unrelated to the actor as āevidenceā and adds another 100 lies left by the deceased, falsehood does not become truth.
-- The actual original names were āChaltteokā and āHotteokā, not those cited in the accusations.
--There is no evidence of a ārenaming,ā as the names Chaltteok, Hotteok, Dal, and Gureum coexisted and were publicly mentioned by Kim Sae-ron between 2018ā2020.
--There are documented mentions indicating that Dal and Gureum were already 1 year old in March 2019, which completely invalidates the timeline invoked by the accusers.
The attempt to construct a supposed relationship between Kim Soo-hyun and Kim Sae-ron by interpreting the names of animals does not constitute evidence, but speculation, with no probative value. Moreover, public information suggests that if these names could be associated with a real person, they appear to be much more closely linked to an idol member, with whom Kim Sae-ron seemed close both during her minor years and afterward. This directly contradicts the direction in which suspicions are being forcibly oriented.
Therefore, using the catsā names as āevidenceā constitutes:
--a distortion of facts,
--a speculative construction,
--and an attempt to manipulate public opinion.
Turning private and legally irrelevant elements into pseudo-evidence does not constitute a valid legal argument.
The conclusion is clear: Credible accusations cannot be built based on symbolic interpretations of the names of animals.
Responsibility for spreading these claims lies both with those who formulated them and the media outlets that reproduced them without minimal verification of the facts.
OLD ARTICLES:
āSnail Hotelā ā Kim Sae-ron Seen with Her Adorable Cat
Reporter: Park Hanna, September 12, 2018, 16:49
Kim Sae-ron, known for her beauty and close relationship with her family, frequently posts on SNS expressing her love for her parents and siblings. In one post, she writes āour little darlingā and shares a photo of her cat.
Kim Sae-ronās cats, named Chaltteok and Hotteok, also draw attention for their subtle and charming demeanor.
Kim Sae-ron Shows Off Her Smart Pet Owner Life, Home Looks Like a Hotel
(OSEN) Reporter Park So-young, April 21, 2020, 17:59
Actress Kim Sae-ron shared a glimpse of her clever life as a pet owner.
On the 20th, Kim Sae-ron posted a photo on her Instagram with the message: āStaying at home with Gu and Aron.ā In the photo, she is holding her cat while also holding a bag of snacks.
https://kbizoom.com/song-min-ho-has-a-weather-tattoo-on-his-neck-and-circles-the-rain-symbol-when-he-is-not-in-good-condition/
https://www.allkpop.com/article/2025/05/late-actress-kim-sae-ron-reportedly-dated-a-popular-idol-member-around-2018
Kim Soo Hyun Was Never Given a Fair Chance
- How a Witch-Hunt Began and Why a Lawyer Added Fuel to It
1.
When the controversy involving Soo Hyun and the late Kim Sae Ron began, online platforms treated him as guilty before any facts were confirmed. AI-edited audio, misleading photos, and his repeated denials were ignored.
What happened was a clear witch-hunt and large-scale cyberbullying that eventually forced him into a tearful press conference
2.
At that time, attorney Lee Don Ho livestreamed the press conference. Many viewers felt his tone was mocking.
His thumbnails used phrases like āfull makeupā and ācrying hardā and even words like āredemption planā which made Kim Soo Hyun look as if he were already a criminal.
A video titled āEven if he met a middle school girl, punishment is difficultā created a harmful misunderstanding, even though no such meeting was ever proven. A single phrase distorted public perception.
3.
Because a lawyerās voice carries authority, reactions like his give online mobs justification. He continued posting videos and shorts about the press conference, and fans told me they felt he was benefiting from growing traffic. Some said they were shocked to see him pleased when his content appeared on TV.
4.
From the beginning, I saw the presumption of innocence collapsing. The truth was getting buried under edited clips and speculative narratives.
I defended Kim Soo Hyun not because it helped me but because it was the right thing to do. What I saw was a man overwhelmed by misinformation and public pressure.
5.
This issue goes beyond one actor or one lawyer. As YouTube sensationalism grows, some attorneys now rely on viral outrage instead of professional judgment. This harms public trust and damages the legal community. The Korean Bar Association should address this seriously and protect the integrity of the profession.
Justice should not be shaped by algorithms or public anger. It must be based on facts and fairness.
--
Kim Dohyung (Dangbussam)
FA Inc.
Nov 25, 2025