another hater who believe the greedy and those without credible proof.
Let’s talk about you and your character. The pattern is simple: slander and gossip are your habit, the same mechanism you use in everyday life = neighbor, colleague, relative = there is always someone to “diminish.” Not because that’s how they are, but because that is the only position in which you exist. What you say about Kim Soo Hyun is not about him; it describes exclusively your mental process: the need to turn people into subjects of gossip, your nourishment. In this world there are many like you, people who live off denigration, who have no substance, who only destroy through words because they truly have not achieved anything remarkable in their lives. Everything you wrote here is your complete portrait. Not that of the one you name. Your character is not defined by what you elevate, but by the malice you throw around.
First let myself clear, I'm not defending him or accusing him and not jumping on anyoneI read many comments below…
If you are neutral, how is it that you only repeat the accusations that were made against Kim Soo Hyun, even though there is already enough evidence that these accusations are false?
You say that Kim Sae Ron died “on his birthday.” It was about her 20th suicide attempt, can you claim that all the other attempts were also on his birthday?
Why don’t you mention the failed marriage with an abusive husband and the suspicion of an abortion which deepened her depression?
Couldn’t her decision have something to do with the fact that although she tried to return to her profession after the DUI, she couldn’t, and the café business couldn’t be started?
But the cyberbullying she suffered during all the period after the DUI and the debts she had, as well as the psychiatric treatment she had to take and the failed nightmare marriage, doesn’t that make you think she had deeper problems than a relationship that ended five years ago?
Why should his crying at the press conference be analyzed? How do you explain that any normal person would react emotionally if dragged into a massive public scandal, with unfounded accusations and huge media pressure? Can that be considered an act that harmed someone?
What do you think about the fact that all online accusations against Kim Soo Hyun were spread based on rumors and lies, and when verification of the evidence on which he was accused was requested, the accusers refused to hand over the evidence for authenticity verification? Doesn’t that raise serious questions?
The photo attached to the 2016 KakaoTalk conversation turned out to have been taken in 2020. If it was a real conversation, why did the photo have to be falsified?
Why didn’t the accusers hand over the phone for official verification and to bring justice to the deceased, if the evidence is real?
Wouldn’t it be normal for the evidence to be analyzed before drawing conclusions and accusing someone?
If all the evidence released publicly turned out to be false, should we all still accuse him? Wouldn’t it be normal for there to be voices in favor as well, who analyze the situation objectively and support his defense?
If the interpretation of emotions and reactions is done without verified evidence, don’t you think that a person can quickly be turned into a scapegoat, even if the real truth is much more complex?
His lawyer emphasized that defamation based on lies must be fought. How do you justify the continuation of the accusations when his defenders have presented concrete evidence that demonstrates the falsity of the rumors and AI accusations?
Finally, how can you claim that the online accusations reflect reality, when the full context, her family, her husband, the public pressure, and the industry, is ignored, and when the existing evidence has been proven false?
And if you wanted to have a neutral message, how do you explain the condemnation you already made through the statement: “he is not the only one to be responsible for her death even if he is really involved.” On what do you base the last part in which you say that he is really involved when all, absolutely all, the evidence with which he was accused turned out to be false?
Listen carefully. You should be ashamed of yourself for throwing accusations without any basis, built on gossip and internet rumors. If you’re so sure of what you’re saying, go to the police with concrete evidence, not with fabrications. Kim Soo Hyun is not a pedophile, no matter how much some of you would like to tarnish his image. All this “defamation” started online, out of nothing, and until now no authentic evidence has appeared. Neither the “thousands of photos,” nor the “stolen phone,” nor the “pink diary,” nor the “eight witnesses” have ever been seen. It was all just another story straight out of YouTube built on fake scandals and manufactured drama. And let’s be clear: if there had been real evidence, there would have been no need to buy an AI recording, right? But when the truth is missing, all sorts of pathetic manipulation attempts appear, where the greedy family and Garo play the main roles. The truth is not proven through their cheap theater, but through facts. And so far, the facts are missing. Before you write something, think about it. The truth doesn’t need a show, it stands through confidence of the one who knows he’s clean. Stop feeding the lie. Respect is earned through dignity, not through scandal.
You will all jump through hoops to defend this man, but at the end of the day, KIM SAE-RON CHOSE TO LEAVE THIS…
Let’s be realistic: the only ‘sin’ of Kim Soo Hyun was that he had a brief relationship with her years ago. She got married, divorced, had another boyfriend, and tried to take her own life dozens of times. Do you think all of this happened on his birthday? Obviously not. The heavens do not deal with gossip and lies, but with the truth. If anyone deserves to be judged, it is the ‘fake aunt,’ the charlatan Garosero, and the greedy family who manipulated everything, exposing her messy life. KIM SOO-HYUN is just a victim, an innocent soul caught in a manipulation. So stop with the baseless accusations and let the truth speak with real evidence, not invented and falsified to fit the narratives of the true criminals.
The Extortion Scheme Targeting Mr. Kim Soo HyunAccording to Attorney Kho Sang Rock, it has been established that…
They are scoundrels, I can’t call these filth who call themselves people anything else. A fee of 20% without any court action is not a fee for legal services, it is a tribute. It is a tacit acknowledgment that the payment is made to put an end to pressure, not to honor a contract or a sentence. It is, in essence, the mechanism of a blackmail machine. The use of social networks and certain YouTubers as instruments to amplify false accusations shows with surgical precision that the goal is not justice, but the destruction of reputation. It is a tactic of dirty gardening: you plant inventions, let them take root in the public space, and then demand money to pull them out. The fact that Kim Soo Hyun had the strength to say “no” and not let himself be blackmailed exposed the whole scheme. He tore down the façade and revealed the mechanism. Looking at the whole picture, I see a clear, coordinated, and very aggressive attempt at extortion. And for that, the answer is: A criminal investigation. Period.
It’s incredible how some people completely lose their minds just to throw insults. I don’t know what you think you gain by writing something like this, but know that you won’t find any support or validation here. Throwing serious accusations without real evidence doesn’t make you important, it makes you pathetic and miserable.
So keep your theories to yourself and learn not to judge people based on rumors or other people’s nonsense.
Considering that there has been virtually no progress in the complaints filed by Kim Soo-hyun against Kim Se-ui…
Bro, I can’t believe what I’m reading. 16 cases?! How is it possible that the 5 cases involving Kim Soo-hyun are the ones still on hold. The lawyer clearly said that we are dealing with a huge, nationwide fraud. And honestly, everything related to KSH seems obviously fabricated, the evidence from Garo0 turned out to be falsified. Then why wasn’t Kim Soo-hyun’s case sent first to the special team. Why is the very case in which the evidence was proven false being delayed. It’s hard not to wonder: who is protecting Kim Se-ui? Who has enough influence to block the investigation even when everything is so obvious? Something is definitely not right here.
Lately, several official statements have been issued by Kim Soo Hyun, and certain pieces of evidence have been…
Based on the information presented, there are several inconsistencies in the alleged relationship between Kim Soo Hyun and the deceased person: the messages and photos appear to be false or taken out of context, and some situations do not match his military schedule. Additionally, it is shown that the person was involved in another problematic relationship and was going through personal trauma. Overall, the data suggest that the accusations against KSH are not supported by clear evidence.
What? So by this logic you will watch a murderer in tv too if he's a good actor
Oh, dear, let me explain something, because it seems you missed the lesson about respect and reality. When you call Kim Soo Hyun a “murderer" without evidence, without an investigation, without any court decision, you are not “honest”, you are just irresponsible. In the real world, not the one in comments, guilt is determined with evidence, not with gossip and frustrations. Kim Soo Hyun has not been accused, investigated, or convicted of anything. Absolutely nothing. So what you said is not an “opinion,” it is slander in every sense, but said with the confidence as if you were the internet’s prosecutor. You have two options: 👉 have evidence➖go to the authorities. 👉 have no evidence➖go to sleep. Because between “truth” and “your big mouth” there is no gray area. The truth has facts. You have… comments.
Uneducated fools crying T^T under every dissenting comment are so entertaining to watch. This is what a parasocial…
@dead lilies With every account you appear with, you only manage to confirm your talent for making a fool of yourself in multiple formats. You’re still trying to seem intellectual? It’s not working this time either. You’re pathetic.
Your post repeats a string of factual assertions about Kim Soo Hyun that are unproven and presented as fact. That…
Impressive CV you have, indeed. It’s just a pity that no paragraph from the code of common sense seems to have been studied. Maybe next time, before you invoke “law,” it would be good to learn respect as well. And please, leave me your phone number, maybe I’ll call you when I want some counseling on how to make a fool of myself online.
You are a very evil and wicked person. This seed of evil you have sown to someone you don't even know will definitely…
The only person who is insulting others is you. Calling her "crazy" or "parasocial" doesn't make you superior, it just makes you lose yourself even more in your own hatred. She doesn't have to resort to insults to defend her ideas. You react, she uses her brain. The difference is huge and it shows. You've harassed every user who has commented here. What is your goal, exactly? Do you want to intimidate or what?
According to an investigation by Money Today on the 5th, the grieving family revealed in March, through the Garo…
The obsession with eliminating Soo Hyun was evident from the very first moments. Everything was planned with cold precision, without a trace of empathy. Their target was always the same: Soo Hyun. It's just that, in their perfect calculation, they forgot one essential detail, that he is not the type to give in. And that's where everything fell apart. In the press conference on March 31, 2025, Soo Hyun clearly said: "I'm not asking you to believe me, I will prove myself," and "I will not blame myself for something I did not do." These words do not come from someone who is afraid, but from a person who knows his innocence and is ready to prove it to the whole world.
Or...now I know this is hard to belief for this pedo's diehard fans, he was two-timing her?Personal diaries are…
How could they prove otherwise? By showing those KakaoTalk messages supposedly exchanged during his “leave”, while he was actually in the middle of a military operation? Or maybe by producing the tons of evidence they never showed, and the few bits Garo Sero did present but now refuse to hand over for forensic review? Nice try. Bravo on the “success.”
Sasaengs praising a “resilient KSH fanbase” is like addicts explaining their cook ups as ‘family meals’.
@chomsky8 Try to live a happy life, it must be exhausting to manage so many accounts and so many '‘personalities". A sincere piece of advice: visit a psychiatrist, they do wonders. You might realize that it’s much more comforting and pleasant to be just one person.
Everything you wrote here is your complete portrait. Not that of the one you name. Your character is not defined by what you elevate, but by the malice you throw around.
You say that Kim Sae Ron died “on his birthday.” It was about her 20th suicide attempt, can you claim that all the other attempts were also on his birthday?
Why don’t you mention the failed marriage with an abusive husband and the suspicion of an abortion which deepened her depression?
Couldn’t her decision have something to do with the fact that although she tried to return to her profession after the DUI, she couldn’t, and the café business couldn’t be started?
But the cyberbullying she suffered during all the period after the DUI and the debts she had, as well as the psychiatric treatment she had to take and the failed nightmare marriage, doesn’t that make you think she had deeper problems than a relationship that ended five years ago?
Why should his crying at the press conference be analyzed? How do you explain that any normal person would react emotionally if dragged into a massive public scandal, with unfounded accusations and huge media pressure? Can that be considered an act that harmed someone?
What do you think about the fact that all online accusations against Kim Soo Hyun were spread based on rumors and lies, and when verification of the evidence on which he was accused was requested, the accusers refused to hand over the evidence for authenticity verification? Doesn’t that raise serious questions?
The photo attached to the 2016 KakaoTalk conversation turned out to have been taken in 2020. If it was a real conversation, why did the photo have to be falsified?
Why didn’t the accusers hand over the phone for official verification and to bring justice to the deceased, if the evidence is real?
Wouldn’t it be normal for the evidence to be analyzed before drawing conclusions and accusing someone?
If all the evidence released publicly turned out to be false, should we all still accuse him? Wouldn’t it be normal for there to be voices in favor as well, who analyze the situation objectively and support his defense?
If the interpretation of emotions and reactions is done without verified evidence, don’t you think that a person can quickly be turned into a scapegoat, even if the real truth is much more complex?
His lawyer emphasized that defamation based on lies must be fought. How do you justify the continuation of the accusations when his defenders have presented concrete evidence that demonstrates the falsity of the rumors and AI accusations?
Finally, how can you claim that the online accusations reflect reality, when the full context, her family, her husband, the public pressure, and the industry, is ignored, and when the existing evidence has been proven false?
And if you wanted to have a neutral message, how do you explain the condemnation you already made through the statement: “he is not the only one to be responsible for her death even if he is really involved.” On what do you base the last part in which you say that he is really involved when all, absolutely all, the evidence with which he was accused turned out to be false?
All this “defamation” started online, out of nothing, and until now no authentic evidence has appeared. Neither the “thousands of photos,” nor the “stolen phone,” nor the “pink diary,” nor the “eight witnesses” have ever been seen. It was all just another story straight out of YouTube built on fake scandals and manufactured drama.
And let’s be clear: if there had been real evidence, there would have been no need to buy an AI recording, right? But when the truth is missing, all sorts of pathetic manipulation attempts appear, where the greedy family and Garo play the main roles.
The truth is not proven through their cheap theater, but through facts. And so far, the facts are missing. Before you write something, think about it.
The truth doesn’t need a show, it stands through confidence of the one who knows he’s clean.
Stop feeding the lie. Respect is earned through dignity, not through scandal.
Throwing serious accusations without real evidence doesn’t make you important, it makes you pathetic and miserable.
So keep your theories to yourself and learn not to judge people based on rumors or other people’s nonsense.
Calling her "crazy" or "parasocial" doesn't make you superior, it just makes you lose yourself even more in your own hatred. She doesn't have to resort to insults to defend her ideas. You react, she uses her brain. The difference is huge and it shows. You've harassed every user who has commented here. What is your goal, exactly? Do you want to intimidate or what?