Hope1234

Wow, what a trip. Christianity has nothing to do with reincarnation. Lol. They are totally opposite beliefs. What may have happened is that he didn't die and disappeared with him for a while.

Mouse is surprisingly ambitious and only brings bad messages. During the last episode many characters offended Ji Eun by considering her as bad as the killers themselves. So can I say that Choi Ran is as crazy as OZ's chief secretary? Choi Ran had an ambition to want to point out so many controversial issues without giving due ethical importance to any of them. First she tries to show that BR was a monster from birth, but after that she was a social victim. Then he used Hong Joo and Daniel to kill other serial killers at the hands of BR ... But what if they were also social victims? LoL. It showed someone desperate for guilt as a suicide, showed that Yo Han's son will no longer be rejected because his father was innocent, encouraged prejudice about children of murderers being like their parents ... It was a ghostly ride, where only it made me want to throw up with the eugenicist message from the author. It is so funny that she forces a villain as cliché as the Secretary to make the abortion law happen. Hypocria is the name, right?

I am shocked by this. Then they will regret and make emotional texts on their social networks. Writers love to talk about controversial topics but offer a solution, they don't know. After seeing the last episode subtitled in my language I was really shocked at how much such a nasty message came out of this story.

I understand your points. Everything written to make the race easier to cope with the end. Run over common sense. But in addition to the lack of OZ that was so irrelevant, we have several unethical points that instead of being fought, on the contrary, were displayed as trophies. YH's son only gained empathy after being acquitted, and not for the simple reason that we should never make this pre-judgment. But in the end they give this reason when he makes BR as or more cruel than his father. It is the suicide of Ji Eun. Then they complain and mourn suicide deaths even of artists on social networks, but insist on making such a scene. Ethics and empathy have passed away from this drama.

Because there is no difference between OZ's lead secretary and Choi Ran. A thousand contexts were created without any depth. It was all in the field of prejudice so let's kill these children. Totally disappointed with so many bad messages, scraps and without a single measure of help or therapies. The suicide part of JiEun was a bad choice as we have a number of alarms about it. Writers know the weight of persuasion on their viewers, so a little empathy and depth with very serious topics, should be explored more as a solution and not tragedies.

It would have been activated for any other reason. Because we already see his purely sadistic traits in his first death. Why was it shown like this? A killer like him doesn't understand that it's wrong, and he still has fun with it. The only thing he knows is that if he is caught he will be punished for it.

I understand your point. The way Bareum was introduced shows that at some point he would start killing. If it weren't for Oz, it would be for another reason. After he grew up, he would kill when he was angry for any reason. But the author wanted to give him a chance to have a substituted frontal lobe, so people see him as a possibility of having been good. Lol. Confusing message ... I will create the worst psychopath of Korean dramas, so I want him to suffer by giving him a frontal lobe that will compel him to have remorse, but I will also say that he was a victim of society. I think it's kind of controversial.