J100

Two years have already passed, for some unclear reason and despite all the success of the couple, they don't even appear anymore, at least not that I know of.

I'm quite shocked that two years have passed and we still haven't received a second season or any new developments, very disappointing.

I continue to watch it despite it being one of the worst series they've ever produced. Wondering How did they manage to turn a series that was funny and emotional into something hollow, boring, devoid of any humor.

I just skip to Mark scenes.

In my opinion, their performance wasn't that bad. The problem was mostly with the series as a whole, but the series is entertaining, and that's its purpose. There's not much to expect from such a series, unfortunately. Thai Drama quality is usually low because those are their established standards. If there's something good, it's always a pleasant surprise.

In my opinion, their performance wasn't that bad. The problem was mostly with the series as a whole, but the series is entertaining, and that's its purpose. There's not much to expect from such a series, unfortunately. Thai Drama quality is usually low because those are their established standards. If there's something good, it's always a pleasant surprise.

In my opinion, he's ok actor. He has a good ability to convey emotions,. However, I've only seen him in one role.

He is not responsible for the feelings of an adult , who chose to be a public figure and knows that this has implications. He expressed a legitimate opinion in a forum, and it's his right to express his opinion. He didn't say anything extreme like a curse or exaggerated description. It seems there's also a misunderstanding of what social media is and your desire for justice. Your desire to educate everyone and impose your justice on everyone will not help the actor or prevent injustice, which you probably don't fully understand.

Matsumoto Sakae is not convincing in his sincerity, and Soga Hisashi is uninteresting, boring, and it's unclear what the appeal towards him is. The female character is also annoying and only made the episode even more boring. The plot is lacking, there are no stories to spice it up a bit, overall it doesn't work, but it's entertaining and passes the time.

There's a flood of such strange series featuring anthropomorphized pets for romantic purposes, it's unclear what their deal is.

Because he is not a Robot, he is an humanoid.

The concept is apocalyptic, but for Taiwanese, it doesn't matter. The plot also lacks too much logic, meaning on one hand, they conduct an experiment on the patient and bring him a humanoid, on the other hand, the humanoid is not in track with all his "doings", it also doesn't set boundaries as one would expect humanoid to do. But if we put seriousness aside, as such entertainment probably cannot be criticized for its silliness, the first episode was cute.

Sweet, it's a pity it's only 6 episodes.

It's not the best J series I've seen, but the Hachimura is a fantastic actor, and his character is stunning, making it hard not to like it and continue watching.Apparently, there is another episode. It would have been disappointing if this had been the last one.

The actors are what keep me watching, but it's one of the worst series I've ever seen due to the poor dubbing, the amount of clichés, and the outdated musical effects we all suffered from over 10 years ago. I thought they had moved past that, but they manage to surprise.

It's quite complex. If it's a drama that aspires to have existential meaning, it needs to be authentic, emotional, or at least artistic. In my view, Koreans are masters of art, but unfortunately, many decisions in their dramas boil down to a formula, preventing them from fully realizing many ideas that could work well if they weren't constrained by profit motives. For high-quality Korean series or films, Kim Ki-duk's works stand out as exceptionally cinematic. But for something simpler, "My Star" was very authentic, almost without a budget, yet the message was beautifully conveyed. There's another series I can't remember the name of, about a guy who goes back in time to the man who saved him as a child and paid with his life for it. That series was also low-budget and almost student-level, but still, the sense of identification was conveyed. Unfortunately, there aren't many, and my level of criticism is quite high.

The series started from the end and worked its way to the beginning, instead of the other way around. The end of the series didn't disappoint me because I had no expectations to begin with. I understand the idea that loving others can help you find the meaning of life or the reason to keep going when times are hard. However, the series failed to make me feel a connection to the main characters or their struggles. This might be due to today's viewers being accustomed to the latest tech and concepts from things like game theory or The Matrix. The pacing of the series felt too rapid. Perhaps for those who have grown up with Tik tok or Youtube, this type of show is appealing. But it also seems that because life is quite comfortable for most people nowadays, they don't truly experience significant and authentic suffering. No doubt, many people suffer, but real suffering involves loss or existential threats. While suffering is subjective, this extreme benchmark probably makes you realize there's no Matrix, and life isn't just a technological game, at least in my opinion. It's very likely that this effect was also due to the series portraying suffering in a relatively minor way, meaning issues like an alcoholic father, family loss, or not giving enough space for such themes as they did with other scenes. For instance, there was only one scene with the father, and then one with the mother, which the main character ran away from after seeing her once. They saved the reconciling scene for the last episode, which was a mistake, as the last episode seemed to be the only one that really delved into the depth of these issues, but by then, it was too late for my liking.

As I always say, what makes a series good is its ending more than anything, and the ending was good. It didn't matter that it was sad, and it didn't matter that the editing was poor, you and I remember it and probably quite a few others do as well.

I enjoy critiquing films and also delving into the philosophical and cultural meanings behind the ideas. It's a bit hard to do this when everything repeats itself, so I at least need to develop my critique if the plots aren't evolving:)))

The trope of the "underdog's triumph"