People don’t like change, they want the same bland bs so they can cry about how it’s all the same, then when…
The fact that you did that and you're fine isn't proof that doing that isn't dangerous or stupid. It's merely anecdotal evidence that it doesn't always end up fatal.
I do absolutely think she's a moron for running after that man who stranded her somewhere remote to potentially die. It's an inherently moronic thing to do.
Sum first walked in then was dragged further in. Autism isn't a catch all; I'm saying this as a neurodivergent person myself. She can still reason and she knows that the world has danger in it, and that people using her app have been put into dangerous situations as a result of that use. She doesn't need to be able to process emotion very well to see the situational danger right in front of her.
And you don't see the idiocy in having absolutely no security in that situation, even when a serial killer is after her? Her life at that point isn't "business as usual." She should be taking better precautions. Not doing so is idiotic.
He didn't try to kill them even before finding out they were Sum's friends. That's the part that makes no sense.
I think your "reasons" for defending this show need to be thought out a bit deeper than you just liking it. And in any case, you're also injecting bias into their opinion with your staunch defence of it. Seems like that's fine as long as they come out with the opinion you want them to have? People come here to find out whether or not the show is worth them giving their time and attention to. Shooting down anyone who suggests it isn't, isn't giving a balanced view. It's just setting the people who like coherency in their thrillers up for disappointment.
People don’t like change, they want the same bland bs so they can cry about how it’s all the same, then when…
I have. But I was smart enough not to do it in a way that puts me in immediate and obvious danger by isolating me with someone whose intentions I can't fully predict. But just meeting with someone off an app without giving thought as to whether the way in which they meet the person puts them in more danger than it should isn't the only dumb thing these characters did with regards to their physical safety. It's the fact that they keep putting themselves in the position of being alone with this man.
One of them actively pursues him in an already dangerous area, while her mobility is impeded by the terrain being wheelchair unfriendly, going further and further into a maze of shops rather than following a worker out or asking someone to escort her out. It was stupid of her to even agree to seeing this dude who has shown no regard for her physical safety before that but then making the active decision to go into a dark, secluded area to talk to him rather than being like, "Oh? You're at a coffee shop? Let me come there so we can talk," is the kind of idiocy that gets people who aren't being protected by screenwriters killed.
Another one of them walks into an abandoned building at night because what? A teenager on her phone said he was there?
Another one leaves her doors unlocked when she knows a serial killer has her on his radar and then tries to threaten him when he's within arm's reach of her. Or rather, when she's within arm's reach of him. Because if he'd decided that instead of just shutting her up, he was gonna strangle her, she wouldn't have been able to do a damn thing about it. BUT HE DOESN'T KILL HER. He never actually tries to kill any of them. Why? Because the script says so? 'Cause aside from Kim Sum, I can see no other reason why he wouldn't just kill the other two.
The point is, you can look at all this dumbfuckery and still think it's a good thriller and a good show, and that's fine. No one can tell you what to enjoy. Other people can look at it and think it's dumbfuckery. The fact that you keep telling people that they're immature for thinking this show is bad, making assumptions about why they don't like it and then thinking they're immature for those opinions that YOU'VE foisted onto them, that just sounds like projecting to me.
People don’t like change, they want the same bland bs so they can cry about how it’s all the same, then when…
I recognise that you're likely a troll and that's why you're up and down this page defending this show from anyone who has anything negative to say about it, no matter how reasonable their words and opinions are but on the off chance that anyone else sees this and cares: No one said anything about sex. I don't care that they have sex. They could be fucking all day, every day and only take breaks to eat for all I care. Sex on TV and in movies doesn't bother me in the slightest. And to be honest with you, I think that there should have been ONE MORE sex scene, because I find it frankly weird that they showed heterosexual sex but faded to black for homosexual sex. Feels homophobic in a way. But we're not broaching all the ways in which this show failed at diversity, we're talking about how stupid all three of these women are.
The problem is that none of them have any sense of self preservation. They act like they've only recently been introduced to the concept of physical danger. Like kids who were never taught about stranger danger. That's what makes them morons. The fact that they act moronic. The only reason why they didn't all die is that, through plot armour, the serial killer they kept meeting up with, just kept choosing not to kill them, even though he readily and gleefully killed other people.
I like and enjoy thrillers. But the reason why it's such a difficult genre to pull off is that the writing needs to balance mystery, characters and thrill. This completely failed at its characters.
People don’t like change, they want the same bland bs so they can cry about how it’s all the same, then when…
The problem isn't that people like bland BS. It's that they expect not to have the shows they watch treat them like idiots. It's one thing to have the main cast of characters be chock full of morons, it's another thing entirely to expect that the audience shouldn't recognise that they're morons and be irritated by their stupidity.
I do absolutely think she's a moron for running after that man who stranded her somewhere remote to potentially die. It's an inherently moronic thing to do.
Sum first walked in then was dragged further in. Autism isn't a catch all; I'm saying this as a neurodivergent person myself. She can still reason and she knows that the world has danger in it, and that people using her app have been put into dangerous situations as a result of that use. She doesn't need to be able to process emotion very well to see the situational danger right in front of her.
And you don't see the idiocy in having absolutely no security in that situation, even when a serial killer is after her? Her life at that point isn't "business as usual." She should be taking better precautions. Not doing so is idiotic.
He didn't try to kill them even before finding out they were Sum's friends. That's the part that makes no sense.
I think your "reasons" for defending this show need to be thought out a bit deeper than you just liking it. And in any case, you're also injecting bias into their opinion with your staunch defence of it. Seems like that's fine as long as they come out with the opinion you want them to have? People come here to find out whether or not the show is worth them giving their time and attention to. Shooting down anyone who suggests it isn't, isn't giving a balanced view. It's just setting the people who like coherency in their thrillers up for disappointment.
One of them actively pursues him in an already dangerous area, while her mobility is impeded by the terrain being wheelchair unfriendly, going further and further into a maze of shops rather than following a worker out or asking someone to escort her out. It was stupid of her to even agree to seeing this dude who has shown no regard for her physical safety before that but then making the active decision to go into a dark, secluded area to talk to him rather than being like, "Oh? You're at a coffee shop? Let me come there so we can talk," is the kind of idiocy that gets people who aren't being protected by screenwriters killed.
Another one of them walks into an abandoned building at night because what? A teenager on her phone said he was there?
Another one leaves her doors unlocked when she knows a serial killer has her on his radar and then tries to threaten him when he's within arm's reach of her. Or rather, when she's within arm's reach of him. Because if he'd decided that instead of just shutting her up, he was gonna strangle her, she wouldn't have been able to do a damn thing about it. BUT HE DOESN'T KILL HER. He never actually tries to kill any of them. Why? Because the script says so? 'Cause aside from Kim Sum, I can see no other reason why he wouldn't just kill the other two.
The point is, you can look at all this dumbfuckery and still think it's a good thriller and a good show, and that's fine. No one can tell you what to enjoy. Other people can look at it and think it's dumbfuckery. The fact that you keep telling people that they're immature for thinking this show is bad, making assumptions about why they don't like it and then thinking they're immature for those opinions that YOU'VE foisted onto them, that just sounds like projecting to me.
The problem is that none of them have any sense of self preservation. They act like they've only recently been introduced to the concept of physical danger. Like kids who were never taught about stranger danger. That's what makes them morons. The fact that they act moronic. The only reason why they didn't all die is that, through plot armour, the serial killer they kept meeting up with, just kept choosing not to kill them, even though he readily and gleefully killed other people.
I like and enjoy thrillers. But the reason why it's such a difficult genre to pull off is that the writing needs to balance mystery, characters and thrill. This completely failed at its characters.