The problem, with pairing a lesser known actress with a big name in a production where her role is likely more…
Let’s not mix the hate from novel fans directed at the actresses with the hate from his fans directed at his unfairness.
IF is a big production, and for the fl there are high expectations that youku’s choices don’t meet. When someone like Neo is cast as the ml, people expect the fl to be at his level in terms of skill and experience. Novel fans want an actress who is up to the role they love so much and whether she is loved or hated depends on her skill, experience, and how well she fits the role.
Btw Neo is definitely not up and coming.I'm not sure you understand how important an actor must be to carry a drama with just his name, and with a big production like IF, even more. He works with lesser known actors because they’re exploiting him to help others rise. That’s definitely a good reason for his fans to be upset.
I keep seeing melons of her joining Inverted Fate with Hou Minghao, I think it would be a good pairing, and would…
The problem, with pairing a lesser known actress with a big name in a production where her role is likely more significant than his, is the unfairness. She won’t take the bigger risks (as 1st bil), as she's not able to carry the drama alone, but she will reap the bigger benefits from her role. At the same time, the big name will bring the assurance needed for the drama’s success, but his role likely won’t do justice to that. He’ll basically be used to drive success, take the fall if something goes wrong and won't be treated fairly either way. That’s very unfair. In truth, there is some unfairness for her too, as she’ll work hard but still won’t receive the "official" recognition, since she can’t carry the drama from an investor’s or popularity standpoint. So, as you can see, the hate isn’t without reason.
Just look at what’s happening with the rebirth of the malicious empress, the fl is even famous, but she didn’t have the same strength in carrying a big drama as the ml, or she didn’t want to take the risk with such a big production. Now, he will carry the drama, but who knows how his character will be treated. I really hope that, in Inverted Fate and TROTME, both the mls will have equal importance as the fls in the drama, they deserve it. Btw i didn’t want to get so off-topic on her page, I just wanted to check out her work couse I like her.
I came here to check her age and instead found a lot of nonsensical, strangely written rants. For those who are…
With gpt I even tried to decipher other comments but it isn’t really worth my time. Those are all just a personal, biased, emotionally driven rants, purely opinions, not fac based. A waste of time https://kisskh.at/people/5341-bextiyar-glnezer#comment-25064790
At this point the text you’re quoting is no longer just biased, it’s crossed into unsupported accusations and conspiratorial thinking,
🔺1. The “200M budget → 40% to actors → 80M” claim is not a fact This is the biggest issue. There is no rule in Chinese (or any) TV industry that: actors must receive 40% of the total production budget or that 200M automatically means 80M goes to cast
Budgets usually include: sets, locations, costumes post-production marketing platform fees taxes and insurance
So when someone says: “Actors should get 40% and they were cheated” That is their personal belief, not an industry standard.
🔺2. “30M allocated to cast” is a rumor, not verified accounting Even if that number appeared on Weibo: Weibo ≠ audited financial disclosure Cast pay is not public record People outside the production do not know backend deals
So the claim: “Everyone is being cut in half except the main actor” has zero verifiable proof. It’s speculation stacked on speculation.
🔺3. The military-background accusation is the line that breaks credibility Saying: “He was paid more because of military background” without documents, contracts, or official statements is: not a “fact” not fair criticism legally defamatory in many places
🔺4. Accusing random commenters of “being paid” is a classic escalation pattern When someone starts saying: “Are you getting paid?” “Are you part of Mango/Hunan?” “You’re manipulating people” That’s a defensive spiral, not debate.
It means: their claims are being questioned they feel cornered so they assume bad faith everywhere This is a coping mechanism.
🟧The safest, most accurate conclusion Here’s the clean takeaway you can trust: ❌ Exact Glory salaries are unverified rumors ❌ “40% rule” is made up ❌ Military/political explanations are speculation ❌ Accusations of being “paid commenters” are baseless
This is a one-sided, emotionally charged opinion dressed up as facts.
One last practical note Engaging with someone in this state will not lead anywhere. They’ve already declared: everyone who disagrees is corrupt they won’t reply they’ll “expose” others That’s not discussion — it’s a monologue.
🟧The comment is: heavily biased toward Nazha dismissive of others actor’s merit without proof reliant on rumors and interpretation framed as “facts” when they’re opinions
🟥No need to accept: salary rumors as fact background speculation as truth the idea that promotion equals manipulation
The comment is one-sided, emotionally driven, and not supported by verifiable facts.
What I strongly recommend (for your own sanity too) Stop addressing actors personally Stop invoking military / politics Stop calling people naive, dumb, or propagandized Stop assuming bad faith everywhere None of that helps Nazha.
What this comment is actually doing 🔺1. It’s purely opinion-driven, not fact-based Despite constantly claiming “facts,” “data,” and “sources,” the comment relies on: Weibo rumors about salaries Assumptions about promotions Personal feelings toward Nazha Speculation about background and favoritism
There are no verified contracts, no official salary disclosures, and no confirmed platform statements supporting the accusations.
👉 it’s personal opinion presented as objective truth.
🔺2. It’s written from a strong fan–defensive bias
The author: centers everything around Nazha interprets neutral events as attacks on her treats any success of a co-star as “taking away” from her
This is classic zero-sum fandom thinking: “If he is promoted, Nazha must be harmed.” That doesn’t hold up logically.
🔺3. Accusations are unsupported Claims like: “He was paid more because of background” “He’s being pushed by propaganda” “He lacks ability and doesn’t deserve promotion”
❌ None of this is proven ❌ None of it is sourced ❌ Much of it borders on rumor or character attack
🔺4. Promotion ≠ favoritism A TV station posting more about one actor can mean: current marketing cycle contractual promotion obligations audience targeting algorithm timing
It does not automatically mean: unfair salary political backing discrimination against another actor The comment jumps to conclusions without evidence.
🔺5. Why it feels aggressive and unhinged Constant “bs” language hostile tone insults toward viewers and actors certainty without proof The post is emotional venting, not analysis.
People write like this when they feel wronged — not when they’re presenting a balanced case.
Salary rumors should be treated cautiously promotions don’t equal conspiracy one actor’s success doesn’t invalidate another’s talent
In one sentence 👉 It’s a one-sided, emotionally charged fan rant that attacks other actors using speculation, not facts.
01/28/2026How dare someone post on Weibo that bs Hunan TV posted 35 messages for bs Neo Hou in the last 2 days,…
What’s actually happening here (under the noise)
💥The argument breaks down 🔺1. Weibo posts ≠ proof of corruption or favoritism A TV station posting 35 messages about one actor does not equal: salary manipulation political backing military-family privilege
Promotions are often: contractually obligated tied to current airing schedules driven by marketing teams, not actors Without hard evidence, jumping from promotion volume → systemic corruption is speculation.
🔺2. Salary numbers are almost always rumors In C-ent: “7M,” “30M,” “200M,” “40%” figures on Weibo are not audited data Even insiders rarely know: backend bonuses deferred payments platform subsidies tax-structured compensation
So when someone states: “Everyone else did not get paid their share” That’s emotionally understandable — but not verifiable unless contracts leak.
🔺3. The “military family” angle is a red line without evidence Once someone says: “Does his 3 military generation have anything to do with this” That’s where discussions lose credibility fast, because: It implies political favoritism without proof It invites defamation risks It shuts down neutral readers immediately
Comparison with Nazha: rhetorically risky Constantly framing it as: “Nazha vs everyone else” makes it look like personal grievance, not industry critique. Repetition of “bs” reads as rage, not analysis Accusatory tone (“Nice try! Busted again!”) assumes bad faith
The hard truth (said respectfully) This is not about facts anymore — it’s about feeling unheard. The writing shows: long-term resentment protective loyalty toward Nazha distrust of platforms and fandom politics frustration with how power works in C-ent
I came here to check her age and instead found a lot of nonsensical, strangely written rants. For those who are…
That wall of text is a rant, and the constant “bs” isn’t random. It’s doing a few things at once. Here’s what’s going on, in plain terms 👇 🔺1. “bs” is functioning like verbal highlighter + insult They’re using “bs” as a substitute for swearing (“bullshit”) but also as an intensifier. Instead of writing a clear argument, they stick “bs” in front of everything they dislike: bs AI bs people bs opinions bs manipulation bs writing bs brands bs industry At that point, it stops adding meaning and just becomes noise. It signals anger, not logic.
🔺2. It’s defensive overkill, not mockery This isn’t a joke or satire. It’s defensive and combative, bordering on paranoid. They clearly feel: personally attacked misunderstood invalidated threatened by AI, paid fans, manipulation, “antis,” etc.
Repeating “bs” is a way to: pre-empt criticism delegitimize everyone else assert moral/intellectual superiority Basically: “If I label everything you say as bs, I don’t have to engage with it.”
🔺3. Emotional dysregulation It’s not a language deficit, it’s more like: obsession + grievance spiraling inability to summarize or prioritize mixing facts, opinions, rumors, personal history, and identity into one stream no filtering Venting without brakes.
🔺4. The irony: they accuse others of incoherence while being incoherent They repeatedly claim others: use AI lack sources can’t synthesize write poorly
But their own post: repeats the same points dozens of times contradicts itself mixes unrelated topics (Nazha, luxury brands, communism, MDL, AI, U.S. models, military families…) is nearly impossible to respond to cleanly
That’s why people disengage — not because they’re “paid,” but because it’s exhausting.
🔺5. Why “bs” specifically, over and over? A few likely reasons : Censorship habit: used to platforms where swearing gets flagged Online aggression style: learned behavior from forums Emotional vent placeholder: instead of articulating why something is wrong Control tactic: frames the entire discussion as already decided Once someone does this, they’re no longer discussing — they’re performing anger.
Bottom line ✅ It is an angry, defensive rant using “bs” as a blunt weapon ✅ It signals frustration, insecurity, and a need to dominate the narrative
I came here to check her age and instead found a lot of nonsensical, strangely written rants. For those who are interested, I took a comment and asked gpt what was that "bs" and whether it was some kind of mocking or a deficit, and this is the answer it gave me. I’m sharing this just to make the situation clearer and easier for everyone to understand.
IF is a big production, and for the fl there are high expectations that youku’s choices don’t meet. When someone like Neo is cast as the ml, people expect the fl to be at his level in terms of skill and experience.
Novel fans want an actress who is up to the role they love so much and whether she is loved or hated depends on her skill, experience, and how well she fits the role.
Btw Neo is definitely not up and coming.I'm not sure you understand how important an actor must be to carry a drama with just his name, and with a big production like IF, even more. He works with lesser known actors because they’re exploiting him to help others rise. That’s definitely a good reason for his fans to be upset.
She won’t take the bigger risks (as 1st bil), as she's not able to carry the drama alone, but she will reap the bigger benefits from her role.
At the same time, the big name will bring the assurance needed for the drama’s success, but his role likely won’t do justice to that.
He’ll basically be used to drive success, take the fall if something goes wrong and won't be treated fairly either way. That’s very unfair.
In truth, there is some unfairness for her too, as she’ll work hard but still won’t receive the "official" recognition, since she can’t carry the drama from an investor’s or popularity standpoint.
So, as you can see, the hate isn’t without reason.
Just look at what’s happening with the rebirth of the malicious empress, the fl is even famous, but she didn’t have the same strength in carrying a big drama as the ml, or she didn’t want to take the risk with such a big production. Now, he will carry the drama, but who knows how his character will be treated.
I really hope that, in Inverted Fate and TROTME, both the mls will have equal importance as the fls in the drama, they deserve it.
Btw i didn’t want to get so off-topic on her page, I just wanted to check out her work couse I like her.
And you should learn first not "you should have to learn first 😶
https://kisskh.at/people/5341-bextiyar-glnezer#comment-25064790
🔺1. The “200M budget → 40% to actors → 80M” claim is not a fact
This is the biggest issue.
There is no rule in Chinese (or any) TV industry that:
actors must receive 40% of the total production budget
or that 200M automatically means 80M goes to cast
Budgets usually include:
sets, locations, costumes
post-production
marketing
platform fees
taxes and insurance
So when someone says:
“Actors should get 40% and they were cheated”
That is their personal belief, not an industry standard.
🔺2. “30M allocated to cast” is a rumor, not verified accounting
Even if that number appeared on Weibo:
Weibo ≠ audited financial disclosure
Cast pay is not public record
People outside the production do not know backend deals
So the claim:
“Everyone is being cut in half except the main actor”
has zero verifiable proof.
It’s speculation stacked on speculation.
🔺3. The military-background accusation is the line that breaks credibility
Saying:
“He was paid more because of military background”
without documents, contracts, or official statements is:
not a “fact”
not fair criticism
legally defamatory in many places
🔺4. Accusing random commenters of “being paid” is a classic escalation pattern
When someone starts saying:
“Are you getting paid?”
“Are you part of Mango/Hunan?”
“You’re manipulating people”
That’s a defensive spiral, not debate.
It means:
their claims are being questioned
they feel cornered
so they assume bad faith everywhere
This is a coping mechanism.
🟧The safest, most accurate conclusion
Here’s the clean takeaway you can trust:
❌ Exact Glory salaries are unverified rumors
❌ “40% rule” is made up
❌ Military/political explanations are speculation
❌ Accusations of being “paid commenters” are baseless
This is a one-sided, emotionally charged opinion dressed up as facts.
One last practical note
Engaging with someone in this state will not lead anywhere.
They’ve already declared:
everyone who disagrees is corrupt
they won’t reply
they’ll “expose” others
That’s not discussion — it’s a monologue.
heavily biased toward Nazha
dismissive of others actor’s merit without proof
reliant on rumors and interpretation
framed as “facts” when they’re opinions
🟥No need to accept:
salary rumors as fact
background speculation as truth
the idea that promotion equals manipulation
The comment is one-sided, emotionally driven, and not supported by verifiable facts.
What I strongly recommend (for your own sanity too)
Stop addressing actors personally
Stop invoking military / politics
Stop calling people naive, dumb, or propagandized
Stop assuming bad faith everywhere
None of that helps Nazha.
🔺1. It’s purely opinion-driven, not fact-based
Despite constantly claiming “facts,” “data,” and “sources,” the comment relies on:
Weibo rumors about salaries
Assumptions about promotions
Personal feelings toward Nazha
Speculation about background and favoritism
There are no verified contracts, no official salary disclosures, and no confirmed platform statements supporting the accusations.
👉 it’s personal opinion presented as objective truth.
🔺2. It’s written from a strong fan–defensive bias
The author:
centers everything around Nazha
interprets neutral events as attacks on her
treats any success of a co-star as “taking away” from her
This is classic zero-sum fandom thinking:
“If he is promoted, Nazha must be harmed.”
That doesn’t hold up logically.
🔺3. Accusations are unsupported
Claims like:
“He was paid more because of background”
“He’s being pushed by propaganda”
“He lacks ability and doesn’t deserve promotion”
❌ None of this is proven
❌ None of it is sourced
❌ Much of it borders on rumor or character attack
🔺4. Promotion ≠ favoritism
A TV station posting more about one actor can mean:
current marketing cycle
contractual promotion obligations
audience targeting
algorithm timing
It does not automatically mean:
unfair salary
political backing
discrimination against another actor
The comment jumps to conclusions without evidence.
🔺5. Why it feels aggressive and unhinged
Constant “bs” language
hostile tone
insults toward viewers and actors
certainty without proof
The post is emotional venting, not analysis.
People write like this when they feel wronged — not when they’re presenting a balanced case.
Salary rumors should be treated cautiously
promotions don’t equal conspiracy
one actor’s success doesn’t invalidate another’s talent
In one sentence
👉 It’s a one-sided, emotionally charged fan rant that attacks other actors using speculation, not facts.
💥The argument breaks down
🔺1. Weibo posts ≠ proof of corruption or favoritism
A TV station posting 35 messages about one actor does not equal:
salary manipulation
political backing
military-family privilege
Promotions are often:
contractually obligated
tied to current airing schedules
driven by marketing teams, not actors
Without hard evidence, jumping from promotion volume → systemic corruption is speculation.
🔺2. Salary numbers are almost always rumors
In C-ent:
“7M,” “30M,” “200M,” “40%” figures on Weibo are not audited data
Even insiders rarely know:
backend bonuses
deferred payments
platform subsidies
tax-structured compensation
So when someone states:
“Everyone else did not get paid their share”
That’s emotionally understandable — but not verifiable unless contracts leak.
🔺3. The “military family” angle is a red line without evidence
Once someone says:
“Does his 3 military generation have anything to do with this”
That’s where discussions lose credibility fast, because:
It implies political favoritism without proof
It invites defamation risks
It shuts down neutral readers immediately
Comparison with Nazha: rhetorically risky
Constantly framing it as:
“Nazha vs everyone else”
makes it look like personal grievance, not industry critique.
Repetition of “bs” reads as rage, not analysis
Accusatory tone (“Nice try! Busted again!”) assumes bad faith
❗Mixing:
propaganda
communism
military families
admin bloat
fashion brands
unrelated dramas
…creates cognitive overload.
The hard truth (said respectfully)
This is not about facts anymore — it’s about feeling unheard.
The writing shows:
long-term resentment
protective loyalty toward Nazha
distrust of platforms and fandom politics
frustration with how power works in C-ent
Here’s what’s going on, in plain terms 👇
🔺1. “bs” is functioning like verbal highlighter + insult
They’re using “bs” as a substitute for swearing (“bullshit”) but also as an intensifier. Instead of writing a clear argument, they stick “bs” in front of everything they dislike:
bs AI
bs people
bs opinions
bs manipulation
bs writing
bs brands
bs industry
At that point, it stops adding meaning and just becomes noise. It signals anger, not logic.
🔺2. It’s defensive overkill, not mockery
This isn’t a joke or satire. It’s defensive and combative, bordering on paranoid.
They clearly feel:
personally attacked
misunderstood
invalidated
threatened by AI, paid fans, manipulation, “antis,” etc.
Repeating “bs” is a way to:
pre-empt criticism
delegitimize everyone else
assert moral/intellectual superiority
Basically: “If I label everything you say as bs, I don’t have to engage with it.”
🔺3. Emotional dysregulation
It’s not a language deficit, it’s more like:
obsession + grievance spiraling
inability to summarize or prioritize
mixing facts, opinions, rumors, personal history, and identity into one stream
no filtering
Venting without brakes.
🔺4. The irony: they accuse others of incoherence while being incoherent
They repeatedly claim others:
use AI
lack sources
can’t synthesize
write poorly
But their own post:
repeats the same points dozens of times
contradicts itself
mixes unrelated topics (Nazha, luxury brands, communism, MDL, AI, U.S. models, military families…)
is nearly impossible to respond to cleanly
That’s why people disengage — not because they’re “paid,” but because it’s exhausting.
🔺5. Why “bs” specifically, over and over?
A few likely reasons :
Censorship habit: used to platforms where swearing gets flagged
Online aggression style: learned behavior from forums
Emotional vent placeholder: instead of articulating why something is wrong
Control tactic: frames the entire discussion as already decided
Once someone does this, they’re no longer discussing — they’re performing anger.
Bottom line
✅ It is an angry, defensive rant using “bs” as a blunt weapon
✅ It signals frustration, insecurity, and a need to dominate the narrative